Why Have We Not Been Able to Demonstrate Reduced Mortality in Patients With HFmrEF/HFpEF?

IF 21.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the American College of Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-11-26 Epub Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.033
Toru Kondo, Alasdair D Henderson, Kieran F Docherty, Pardeep S Jhund, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Scott D Solomon, John J V McMurray
{"title":"Why Have We Not Been Able to Demonstrate Reduced Mortality in Patients With HFmrEF/HFpEF?","authors":"Toru Kondo, Alasdair D Henderson, Kieran F Docherty, Pardeep S Jhund, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Scott D Solomon, John J V McMurray","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>No randomized controlled trial has yet demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in mortality in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection (HFmrEF) or heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), in contrast to the benefits observed in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, this probably reflects the statistical power of trials to date to show an effect on mortality rather than mechanistic differences between HFmEF/HFpEF and HFrEF or differences in treatment efficacy. Compared to patients with HFrEF, those with HFmrEF/HFpEF have lower mortality rates and a smaller proportion of potentially modifiable cardiovascular deaths (as opposed to unmodifiable noncardiovascular deaths). In addition, some causes of cardiovascular deaths may not be reduced by treatments for HF. Therefore, the low rate of potentially modifiable deaths in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF, compared with HFrEF, has made it challenging to demonstrate a reduction in death (or cardiovascular death) in trials to date.</p>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"2233-2240"},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

No randomized controlled trial has yet demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in mortality in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection (HFmrEF) or heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), in contrast to the benefits observed in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, this probably reflects the statistical power of trials to date to show an effect on mortality rather than mechanistic differences between HFmEF/HFpEF and HFrEF or differences in treatment efficacy. Compared to patients with HFrEF, those with HFmrEF/HFpEF have lower mortality rates and a smaller proportion of potentially modifiable cardiovascular deaths (as opposed to unmodifiable noncardiovascular deaths). In addition, some causes of cardiovascular deaths may not be reduced by treatments for HF. Therefore, the low rate of potentially modifiable deaths in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF, compared with HFrEF, has made it challenging to demonstrate a reduction in death (or cardiovascular death) in trials to date.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么我们无法证明 HFmrEF/HFpEF 患者的死亡率降低了?
与射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)所观察到的益处相比,目前还没有随机对照试验证明射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)或射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者的死亡率在统计学上有显著降低。不过,这可能反映了迄今为止的试验在统计学上对死亡率的影响,而不是 HFmEF/HFpEF 和 HFrEF 之间的机理差异或疗效差异。与 HFrEF 患者相比,HFmrEF/HFpEF 患者的死亡率较低,潜在可改变的心血管死亡(相对于不可改变的非心血管死亡)比例较小。此外,心血管死亡的某些原因可能不会因治疗心房颤动而减少。因此,与 HFrEF 相比,HFmrEF/HFpEF 患者潜在可改变的死亡率较低,这使得在迄今为止的试验中证明减少死亡(或心血管死亡)具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
期刊最新文献
Bidirectional Relationship Between Kidney Disease Progression and Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes. Why Has it Been Challenging to Modify Kidney Disease Progression in Patients With Heart Failure? Why Have We Not Been Able to Demonstrate Reduced Mortality in Patients With HFmrEF/HFpEF? ApoA-I Infusions and Burden of Ischemic Events After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the AEGIS-II Trial. Exploring the Need for Precise Myocardial Infarction Adjudication in Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1