Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as potential diagnostic markers for rebleeding in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding.

IF 1.7 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY Open Life Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/biol-2022-0852
Lei Chen, Cong Tong, Xiangan Zhao, Chunfang Xu
{"title":"Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as potential diagnostic markers for rebleeding in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding.","authors":"Lei Chen, Cong Tong, Xiangan Zhao, Chunfang Xu","doi":"10.1515/biol-2022-0852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present study is to explore the potential prediction value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or peripheral blood platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for rebleeding in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EVB). We have enrolled 80 rebleeding patients with EVB and 113 EVB patients without rebleeding in the present study. The lymphocyte, platelet counts, the PLR, and the NLR of the candidates were calculated, and receiver-operating characteristic curve was drawn to examine whether NLR or PLR is a sensitive biomarker for distinguishing rebleeding patients from the EVB patients. We observed that NLR and PLR were all significantly increased in rebleeding patients with EVB compared with the non-rebleeding patients (<i>p</i> < 0.01); moreover, the area under the curve of NLR and PLR was 0.7037 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6281-0.7792) and 0.7468 (95% CI, 0.6793-0.8144), respectively, suggesting that NLR or PLR is a sensitive biomarker for distinguishing non-rebleeding patients from the rebleeding patients. We reported that NLR and PLR were significantly increased in the peripheral blood of patient with esophagogastric variceal rebleeding, suggesting that NLR and PLR may be potential early diagnostic and prognostic markers for the rebleeding among patients with EVB.</p>","PeriodicalId":19605,"journal":{"name":"Open Life Sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":"20220852"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365466/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-0852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to explore the potential prediction value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or peripheral blood platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for rebleeding in patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EVB). We have enrolled 80 rebleeding patients with EVB and 113 EVB patients without rebleeding in the present study. The lymphocyte, platelet counts, the PLR, and the NLR of the candidates were calculated, and receiver-operating characteristic curve was drawn to examine whether NLR or PLR is a sensitive biomarker for distinguishing rebleeding patients from the EVB patients. We observed that NLR and PLR were all significantly increased in rebleeding patients with EVB compared with the non-rebleeding patients (p < 0.01); moreover, the area under the curve of NLR and PLR was 0.7037 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6281-0.7792) and 0.7468 (95% CI, 0.6793-0.8144), respectively, suggesting that NLR or PLR is a sensitive biomarker for distinguishing non-rebleeding patients from the rebleeding patients. We reported that NLR and PLR were significantly increased in the peripheral blood of patient with esophagogastric variceal rebleeding, suggesting that NLR and PLR may be potential early diagnostic and prognostic markers for the rebleeding among patients with EVB.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率和血小板与淋巴细胞比率作为食管胃底静脉曲张出血患者再出血的潜在诊断指标。
本研究旨在探讨中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)或外周血血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)对食管胃底静脉曲张出血(EVB)患者再出血的潜在预测价值。本研究共纳入了 80 例 EVB 再出血患者和 113 例无再出血的 EVB 患者。我们计算了候选者的淋巴细胞、血小板计数、PLR 和 NLR,并绘制了接收器-操作特征曲线,以检验 NLR 或 PLR 是否是区分再出血患者和 EVB 患者的灵敏生物标志物。我们观察到,与非再出血患者相比,EVB 再出血患者的 NLR 和 PLR 均明显升高(P < 0.01);此外,NLR 和 PLR 的曲线下面积分别为 0.7037(95% 置信区间 [CI],0.6281-0.7792)和 0.7468(95% CI,0.6793-0.8144),表明 NLR 或 PLR 是区分非再出血患者和再出血患者的灵敏生物标志物。我们发现食管胃底静脉曲张再出血患者外周血中的NLR和PLR明显升高,这表明NLR和PLR可能是EVB患者再出血的潜在早期诊断和预后标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
131
审稿时长
43 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Life Sciences (previously Central European Journal of Biology) is a fast growing peer-reviewed journal, devoted to scholarly research in all areas of life sciences, such as molecular biology, plant science, biotechnology, cell biology, biochemistry, biophysics, microbiology and virology, ecology, differentiation and development, genetics and many others. Open Life Sciences assures top quality of published data through critical peer review and editorial involvement throughout the whole publication process. Thanks to the Open Access model of publishing, it also offers unrestricted access to published articles for all users.
期刊最新文献
An optimization method for measuring the stomata in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) under multiple abiotic stresses. Assessing the proximate compositions of indigenous forage species in Yemen's pastoral rangelands. Comparative analysis of chloroplast genome of Lonicera japonica cv. Damaohua. Comparative transcriptome analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings in response to copper stress. Anti-γ-aminobutyric acid-B receptor autoimmune encephalitis with syncope as the initial symptom: Case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1