Knee braces for knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review and narrative synthesis of interventions in randomised controlled trials

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.010
MA Holden , M. Murphy , J. Simkins , MJ Thomas , L. Huckfield , JG Quicke , N. Halliday , FN Birrell , B. Borrelli , MJ Callaghan , K. Dziedzic , D. Felson , NE Foster , C. Ingram , C. Jinks , S. Jowett , E. Nicholls , G. Peat
{"title":"Knee braces for knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review and narrative synthesis of interventions in randomised controlled trials","authors":"MA Holden ,&nbsp;M. Murphy ,&nbsp;J. Simkins ,&nbsp;MJ Thomas ,&nbsp;L. Huckfield ,&nbsp;JG Quicke ,&nbsp;N. Halliday ,&nbsp;FN Birrell ,&nbsp;B. Borrelli ,&nbsp;MJ Callaghan ,&nbsp;K. Dziedzic ,&nbsp;D. Felson ,&nbsp;NE Foster ,&nbsp;C. Ingram ,&nbsp;C. Jinks ,&nbsp;S. Jowett ,&nbsp;E. Nicholls ,&nbsp;G. Peat","doi":"10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify and synthesise the content of knee bracing interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of knee osteoarthritis (OA).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>In this scoping review, three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane) were searched up to 10th June 2024. Nineteen previous systematic reviews of knee bracing for knee OA and four recent international clinical practice guidelines were also hand searched. Identified studies were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Information on bracing interventions was extracted from included RCT reports, informed by Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) guidelines. Data were synthesised narratively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-one RCTs testing 47 different bracing interventions were included. Braces were broadly grouped as valgus/varus, patellofemoral, sleeve, neutral hinged, or control/placebo knee braces. Brace manufacturer and models varied, as did amount of recommended brace use. Only three interventions specifically targeted brace adherence. Information on brace providers, setting, number of treatment sessions, and intervention modification over time was poorly reported. Adherence to brace use was described for 32 (68%) interventions, most commonly via self-report. Several mechanisms of action for knee braces were proposed, broadly grouped as biomechanical, neuromuscular, and psychological.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Many different knee brace interventions have been tested for knee OA, with several proposed mechanisms of action, a lack of focus on adherence, and a lack of full reporting. These issues may be contributing to the heterogeneous findings and inconsistent guideline recommendations about the clinical effectiveness of knee bracing for knee OA to date.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19654,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","volume":"32 11","pages":"Pages 1371-1396"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458424013657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To identify and synthesise the content of knee bracing interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Design

In this scoping review, three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane) were searched up to 10th June 2024. Nineteen previous systematic reviews of knee bracing for knee OA and four recent international clinical practice guidelines were also hand searched. Identified studies were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Information on bracing interventions was extracted from included RCT reports, informed by Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) guidelines. Data were synthesised narratively.

Results

Thirty-one RCTs testing 47 different bracing interventions were included. Braces were broadly grouped as valgus/varus, patellofemoral, sleeve, neutral hinged, or control/placebo knee braces. Brace manufacturer and models varied, as did amount of recommended brace use. Only three interventions specifically targeted brace adherence. Information on brace providers, setting, number of treatment sessions, and intervention modification over time was poorly reported. Adherence to brace use was described for 32 (68%) interventions, most commonly via self-report. Several mechanisms of action for knee braces were proposed, broadly grouped as biomechanical, neuromuscular, and psychological.

Conclusions

Many different knee brace interventions have been tested for knee OA, with several proposed mechanisms of action, a lack of focus on adherence, and a lack of full reporting. These issues may be contributing to the heterogeneous findings and inconsistent guideline recommendations about the clinical effectiveness of knee bracing for knee OA to date.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节骨性关节炎的膝关节支架:随机对照试验中干预措施的范围界定综述和叙述性综述。
目的确定并综合膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)随机对照试验(RCT)中膝关节支撑干预措施的内容:在此次范围界定综述中,检索了截至 2024 年 6 月 10 日的三个电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane)。此外,还人工检索了之前关于膝关节支撑治疗膝关节 OA 的 19 篇系统性综述以及最近的 4 份国际临床实践指南。由两名独立审查员对确定的研究进行资格筛选。根据干预措施描述与复制模板(Template for Intervention Description and Replication,TIDieR)指南,从纳入的 RCT 报告中提取有关支撑干预措施的信息。对数据进行综合叙述:结果:共纳入了 31 项测试 47 种不同矫治干预措施的 RCT。支具大致分为外翻/内翻、髌股关节、套筒、中性铰链或对照/安慰剂膝关节支具。护具制造商和型号各不相同,推荐使用的护具数量也不尽相同。只有三项干预措施专门针对支架的依从性。有关支具提供者、环境、治疗次数以及干预措施随时间推移而改变的信息报告很少。有 32 项(68%)干预措施介绍了支架使用的依从性,最常见的是通过自我报告。研究人员提出了膝部支撑的几种作用机制,大致分为生物力学、神经肌肉和心理学三类:结论:针对膝关节 OA 测试了许多不同的膝关节护具干预措施,提出了几种作用机制,但缺乏对依从性的关注,也缺乏全面的报告。这些问题可能是导致迄今为止关于膝关节支撑治疗膝关节OA临床效果的研究结果不一和指南建议不一致的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
802
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage is the official journal of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. It is an international, multidisciplinary journal that disseminates information for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with osteoarthritis.
期刊最新文献
Response to the comment on 'The coexistence of diabetes, hypertension and obesity is associated with worse pain outcomes following exercise for osteoarthritis: a cohort study on 80 893 patients'. Association between thyroid function and osteoarthritis: A population-based cohort study. Osteoarthritis year in review 2024: Genetics, genomics, and epigenetics. Role of mitophagy in intervertebral disc degeneration: A narrative review. Early degenerative changes are different between partial and complete anterior cruciate ligament injury and associate with joint instability in a skeletally immature porcine model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1