Assessment of safety culture in radiotherapy facilities using safety performance indicators.

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Radiation protection dosimetry Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncae178
Smriti Sharma, Mahalakshmi Sivaramakrishnan, Arti Tripathi, Pramod Kumar Dixit, Namitha Krishnakumar, Ghanshyam Sahani, Pankaj Kumar Dash Sharma, Sunil Dutt Sharma
{"title":"Assessment of safety culture in radiotherapy facilities using safety performance indicators.","authors":"Smriti Sharma, Mahalakshmi Sivaramakrishnan, Arti Tripathi, Pramod Kumar Dixit, Namitha Krishnakumar, Ghanshyam Sahani, Pankaj Kumar Dash Sharma, Sunil Dutt Sharma","doi":"10.1093/rpd/ncae178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper describes the development of the Safety Performance Indicators (SPIs), the methodology for assessment of the safety culture of radiotherapy institutions using SPIs and common strengths and common areas for improvement. SPIs were categorized into eight sections which all together contain 23 attributes and each attribute has scoring criteria from 0 to 2 (in steps of 0.5). The maximum absolute cumulative score of SPIs was 46. A relative cumulative SPIs score of >80% indicates an institution strong commitment towards safety while score <50% indicates need for additional guidance to enhance safety culture. The assessment using SPIs was conducted for 17 radiotherapy institutions. The methodology of assessment includes interactive discussion, direct observations and document analysis. The relative cumulative SPIs score of seven institutions was found to be >80% while it was found in the range of 67.0% to 80% for the remaining ten institutions. Institutions were communicated about the cumulative SPIs score, areas of strengths, and areas for improvement. SPIs were found to be a good tool for safety culture assessment and can be utilized by the radiotherapy institutes for self-assessment to identify the areas of improvement. Based on SPIs score, regulatory body can grade the institutions from a radiation safety compliance point of view.</p>","PeriodicalId":20795,"journal":{"name":"Radiation protection dosimetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation protection dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncae178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes the development of the Safety Performance Indicators (SPIs), the methodology for assessment of the safety culture of radiotherapy institutions using SPIs and common strengths and common areas for improvement. SPIs were categorized into eight sections which all together contain 23 attributes and each attribute has scoring criteria from 0 to 2 (in steps of 0.5). The maximum absolute cumulative score of SPIs was 46. A relative cumulative SPIs score of >80% indicates an institution strong commitment towards safety while score <50% indicates need for additional guidance to enhance safety culture. The assessment using SPIs was conducted for 17 radiotherapy institutions. The methodology of assessment includes interactive discussion, direct observations and document analysis. The relative cumulative SPIs score of seven institutions was found to be >80% while it was found in the range of 67.0% to 80% for the remaining ten institutions. Institutions were communicated about the cumulative SPIs score, areas of strengths, and areas for improvement. SPIs were found to be a good tool for safety culture assessment and can be utilized by the radiotherapy institutes for self-assessment to identify the areas of improvement. Based on SPIs score, regulatory body can grade the institutions from a radiation safety compliance point of view.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用安全绩效指标评估放射治疗设施的安全文化。
本文介绍了安全绩效指标(SPIs)的制定、使用 SPIs 评估放射治疗机构安全文化的方法、共同优势和有待改进的共同领域。SPIs 分为八个部分,共包含 23 个属性,每个属性的评分标准从 0 到 2(以 0.5 为单位)。SPIs 的绝对累计得分最高为 46 分。相对累积 SPIs 得分大于 80%,表示院校对安全有很强的承诺,得分达到 80%,而其余 10 所院校的得分介于 67.0%至 80%之间。各院校就 SPIs 的累计得分、优势领域和有待改进的领域进行了交流。结果发现,SPIs 是安全文化评估的良好工具,放射治疗机构可利用它进行自我评估,找出需要改进的地方。监管机构可根据 SPIs 分数,从辐射安全合规角度对机构进行评级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation protection dosimetry
Radiation protection dosimetry 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Protection Dosimetry covers all aspects of personal and environmental dosimetry and monitoring, for both ionising and non-ionising radiations. This includes biological aspects, physical concepts, biophysical dosimetry, external and internal personal dosimetry and monitoring, environmental and workplace monitoring, accident dosimetry, and dosimetry related to the protection of patients. Particular emphasis is placed on papers covering the fundamentals of dosimetry; units, radiation quantities and conversion factors. Papers covering archaeological dating are included only if the fundamental measurement method or technique, such as thermoluminescence, has direct application to personal dosimetry measurements. Papers covering the dosimetric aspects of radon or other naturally occurring radioactive materials and low level radiation are included. Animal experiments and ecological sample measurements are not included unless there is a significant relevant content reason.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of occupational radiation exposure during a specific endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedure. Evaluating lead-free alternatives for radiation shielding in diagnostic radiology: a case study from a tertiary general hospital in Korea. An electronic energy compensation method for flattening the energy response of SiPM-GGAG:Ce,B based gamma detector. An approach to assess real workload of medical linear accelerators in Sri Lanka. Assessment of foetal dose and occupational exposure for pregnant workers in nuclear medicine using the Taiwanese pregnancy phantom.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1