Prevalence of continuous positive airway pressure-related aerophagia in obstructive sleep apnea: an observational study of 753 cases undergoing CPAP/BiPAP treatment in a sleep clinic - part one of a two-part series.
{"title":"Prevalence of continuous positive airway pressure-related aerophagia in obstructive sleep apnea: an observational study of 753 cases undergoing CPAP/BiPAP treatment in a sleep clinic - part one of a two-part series.","authors":"Takero Fukutome","doi":"10.1007/s11325-024-03152-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aerophagia occurring during continuous positive airway pressure (C-aerophagia in CPAP) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) disturbs CPAP therapy. However, the diagnostic criteria and exact prevalence of C-aerophagia are not well documented; therefore, this study aimed to evaluate them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Newly developed criteria (flatulence, eructation, and abdominal bloating, with quantitative evaluation of these symptoms and a clear timing of onset) were used to diagnose C-aerophagia. The study included 753 adults with OSA who underwent follow-up visits for positive airway pressure treatment (including CPAP and bilevel positive airway pressure). The observation period ranged from 6 months to 3 years past the survey date (between May 1 and July 31, 2023). Medical records of patients were retrospectively analyzed. Discomfort associated with C-aerophagia was examined using a visual analog scale (VAS); a score ≥ 7 was associated with definite discomfort. Association of patient demographics and CPAP parameters with occurrence of C-aerophagia was analyzed using multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of C-aerophagia was 7.2%. Although more than half of these patients reported discomfort associated with aerophagia, only 44.4% reported to their physician. The multivariate analysis showed that increased CPAP pressure level (odds ratio [OR] = 1.24) and comorbid gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; OR = 2.52) promote C-aerophagia, while increased age (OR = 0.76) and body mass index (BMI; OR = 0.88) inhibit it.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of C-aerophagia was 7.2%. Most patients with C-aerophagia experience discomfort, but may not report these symptoms. High CPAP pressure and GERD promoted C-aerophagia, while aging and increased BMI prevented it.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":" ","pages":"2481-2489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03152-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Aerophagia occurring during continuous positive airway pressure (C-aerophagia in CPAP) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) disturbs CPAP therapy. However, the diagnostic criteria and exact prevalence of C-aerophagia are not well documented; therefore, this study aimed to evaluate them.
Methods: Newly developed criteria (flatulence, eructation, and abdominal bloating, with quantitative evaluation of these symptoms and a clear timing of onset) were used to diagnose C-aerophagia. The study included 753 adults with OSA who underwent follow-up visits for positive airway pressure treatment (including CPAP and bilevel positive airway pressure). The observation period ranged from 6 months to 3 years past the survey date (between May 1 and July 31, 2023). Medical records of patients were retrospectively analyzed. Discomfort associated with C-aerophagia was examined using a visual analog scale (VAS); a score ≥ 7 was associated with definite discomfort. Association of patient demographics and CPAP parameters with occurrence of C-aerophagia was analyzed using multivariate analysis.
Results: The prevalence of C-aerophagia was 7.2%. Although more than half of these patients reported discomfort associated with aerophagia, only 44.4% reported to their physician. The multivariate analysis showed that increased CPAP pressure level (odds ratio [OR] = 1.24) and comorbid gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; OR = 2.52) promote C-aerophagia, while increased age (OR = 0.76) and body mass index (BMI; OR = 0.88) inhibit it.
Conclusion: The prevalence of C-aerophagia was 7.2%. Most patients with C-aerophagia experience discomfort, but may not report these symptoms. High CPAP pressure and GERD promoted C-aerophagia, while aging and increased BMI prevented it.
期刊介绍:
The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep.
Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.