Safety and Efficacy of a Preemptive Mycophenolate Mofetil Dose Reduction Strategy in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2024-08-29 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001697
Karim Yatim, Ayman Al Jurdi, Christopher El Mouhayyar, Leela Morena, Frank E Hullekes, Ruchama Verhoeff, Guilherme T Ribas, Daniel S Pearson, Leonardo V Riella
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of a Preemptive Mycophenolate Mofetil Dose Reduction Strategy in Kidney Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Karim Yatim, Ayman Al Jurdi, Christopher El Mouhayyar, Leela Morena, Frank E Hullekes, Ruchama Verhoeff, Guilherme T Ribas, Daniel S Pearson, Leonardo V Riella","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no high-quality data to guide long-term mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dosing in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) to balance the long-term risks of allograft rejection with that of infections and malignancy. At our center, KTRs are managed with either a \"preemptive\" dose reduction strategy, where the MMF dose is reduced after the first year before the development of adverse events, or with a \"reactive\" dosing strategy, where they are maintained on the same MMF dose and only reduced if they develop an adverse event. We hypothesized that a preemptive MMF dosing strategy after the first year of transplantation is associated with decreased infections without increasing alloimmune complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all KTRs receiving MMF from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of infections requiring hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty-two KTRs met the inclusion criteria, of whom 44 (31%) were in the preemptive group and 98 (69%) were in the reactive group. The median follow-up was 4 y (interquartile range, 3.8-4.0). Multivariable analysis showed that a preemptive MMF dose reduction strategy was associated with a lower risk of infections requiring hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.92). There was no difference in graft loss, rejection, or estimated glomerular filtration rate slope.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preemptive MMF dose reduction in KTRs may be an effective strategy to prevent infections without increasing the risk of allograft rejection. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are no high-quality data to guide long-term mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dosing in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) to balance the long-term risks of allograft rejection with that of infections and malignancy. At our center, KTRs are managed with either a "preemptive" dose reduction strategy, where the MMF dose is reduced after the first year before the development of adverse events, or with a "reactive" dosing strategy, where they are maintained on the same MMF dose and only reduced if they develop an adverse event. We hypothesized that a preemptive MMF dosing strategy after the first year of transplantation is associated with decreased infections without increasing alloimmune complications.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all KTRs receiving MMF from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of infections requiring hospitalization.

Results: One hundred forty-two KTRs met the inclusion criteria, of whom 44 (31%) were in the preemptive group and 98 (69%) were in the reactive group. The median follow-up was 4 y (interquartile range, 3.8-4.0). Multivariable analysis showed that a preemptive MMF dose reduction strategy was associated with a lower risk of infections requiring hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.92). There was no difference in graft loss, rejection, or estimated glomerular filtration rate slope.

Conclusions: Preemptive MMF dose reduction in KTRs may be an effective strategy to prevent infections without increasing the risk of allograft rejection. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾移植受者预先减少霉酚酸酯剂量策略的安全性和有效性
背景:目前还没有高质量的数据来指导肾移植受者(KTR)的长期霉酚酸酯(MMF)剂量,以平衡异体移植排斥反应与感染和恶性肿瘤的长期风险。在我们中心,肾移植受者要么采用 "先发制人 "的减量策略,即在第一年后出现不良反应前减少 MMF 剂量;要么采用 "反应性 "的剂量策略,即维持相同的 MMF 剂量,只有在出现不良反应时才减少剂量。我们假设,在移植第一年后采取先发制人的 MMF 给药策略可减少感染,同时不会增加同种免疫并发症:我们对 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间接受 MMF 的所有 KTR 进行了一项回顾性队列研究。主要结果是需要住院治疗的感染发生率:142例KTR符合纳入标准,其中44例(31%)属于预防组,98例(69%)属于反应组。中位随访时间为 4 年(四分位间范围为 3.8-4.0)。多变量分析显示,先发制人的 MMF 减量策略与需要住院治疗的感染风险较低有关(调整后危险比 = 0.39;95% 置信区间,0.16-0.92)。在移植物损失、排斥反应或估计肾小球滤过率斜率方面没有差异:结论:在KTR中先期减少MMF剂量可能是预防感染的有效策略,同时不会增加异体移植排斥反应的风险。需要进行随机临床试验来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond 75: Graft Allocation and Organ Utility Implications in Liver Transplantation. Clinical Translation and Implementation of a Bioartificial Pancreas Therapy: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Perspectives of People With Type 1 Diabetes. Making Living-donor Liver Transplantation a Viable Option for Patients With Portopulmonary Hypertension. Outcomes of Older Primary Kidney Transplant Recipients by Induction Agent and High-risk Viral Discordance Status in the United States. Molecular Signature Associated With Acute Rejection in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1