Prevalence of cerebral visual impairment in developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies: a systematic review protocol.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02638-6
Martina Giorgia Perinelli, Megan Abbott, Ganna Balagura, Antonella Riva, Elisabetta Amadori, Alberto Verrotti, Scott Demarest, Pasquale Striano
{"title":"Prevalence of cerebral visual impairment in developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Martina Giorgia Perinelli, Megan Abbott, Ganna Balagura, Antonella Riva, Elisabetta Amadori, Alberto Verrotti, Scott Demarest, Pasquale Striano","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02638-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies (DEEs) are defined by drug-resistant seizures and neurodevelopmental disorders. Over 50% of patients have a genetic cause. Studies have shown that patients with DEEs, regardless of genetic diagnosis, experience a central visual function disorder known as Cerebral (cortical) Visual Impairment (CVI). The prevalence of CVI in DEE patients is currently unknown. A quantitative synthesis of existing data on the prevalence rates of this condition would aid in understanding the magnitude of the problem, outlining future research, and suggesting the need for therapeutic strategies for early identification and prevention of the disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol followed the PRISMA-P statement for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols. The review will adhere to the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (Systematic Reviews of Prevalence and Incidence) and use the CoCoPop framework to establish eligibility criteria. We will conduct a comprehensive search of several databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Direct, Scopus, PsychINFO, Wiley, Highwire Press, and Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews. Our primary focus will be determining the prevalence of cerebral visual impairments (Condition) in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (Population). To ensure clarity, we will provide a narrative summary of the risk of bias in the studies we include. The Cochrane Q statistic will be used to assess heterogeneity between studies. If the quantitative synthesis includes more than 10 studies, potential sources of heterogeneity will be investigated through subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Meta(bias)es analysis will also be performed. The quality of evidence for all outcomes will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group methodology.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify, collect, evaluate, and integrate epidemiological knowledge related to the prevalence of CVI in patients with DEEs. To the best of our knowledge, no other systematic review and meta-analysis has addressed this specific issue. The results will provide useful information for understanding the extent of the problem, outlining future research, and suggesting the need for early identification strategies.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registrations: </strong>This Systematic Review Protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023448910).</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"223"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02638-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies (DEEs) are defined by drug-resistant seizures and neurodevelopmental disorders. Over 50% of patients have a genetic cause. Studies have shown that patients with DEEs, regardless of genetic diagnosis, experience a central visual function disorder known as Cerebral (cortical) Visual Impairment (CVI). The prevalence of CVI in DEE patients is currently unknown. A quantitative synthesis of existing data on the prevalence rates of this condition would aid in understanding the magnitude of the problem, outlining future research, and suggesting the need for therapeutic strategies for early identification and prevention of the disorder.

Methods: The protocol followed the PRISMA-P statement for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols. The review will adhere to the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (Systematic Reviews of Prevalence and Incidence) and use the CoCoPop framework to establish eligibility criteria. We will conduct a comprehensive search of several databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Direct, Scopus, PsychINFO, Wiley, Highwire Press, and Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews. Our primary focus will be determining the prevalence of cerebral visual impairments (Condition) in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (Population). To ensure clarity, we will provide a narrative summary of the risk of bias in the studies we include. The Cochrane Q statistic will be used to assess heterogeneity between studies. If the quantitative synthesis includes more than 10 studies, potential sources of heterogeneity will be investigated through subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Meta(bias)es analysis will also be performed. The quality of evidence for all outcomes will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group methodology.

Discussion: This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify, collect, evaluate, and integrate epidemiological knowledge related to the prevalence of CVI in patients with DEEs. To the best of our knowledge, no other systematic review and meta-analysis has addressed this specific issue. The results will provide useful information for understanding the extent of the problem, outlining future research, and suggesting the need for early identification strategies.

Systematic review registrations: This Systematic Review Protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023448910).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发育性脑病和癫痫性脑病中脑视力障碍的患病率:系统性审查方案。
背景:发育性和癫痫性脑病(DEEs)是指具有耐药性的癫痫发作和神经发育障碍。50%以上的患者有遗传病因。研究表明,无论基因诊断结果如何,DEEs 患者都会出现中枢性视觉功能障碍,即大脑(皮层)视觉障碍 (CVI)。目前,DEE 患者中 CVI 的发病率尚不清楚。对该病症患病率的现有数据进行定量综述将有助于了解问题的严重程度、勾勒未来的研究方向并提出早期识别和预防该病症的治疗策略需求:方法:研究方案遵循系统综述和荟萃分析方案的 PRISMA-P 声明。综述将遵守《JBI 证据综合手册》(流行率和发病率的系统综述),并使用 CoCoPop 框架来确定资格标准。我们将对多个数据库进行全面检索,包括 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Science Direct、Scopus、PsychINFO、Wiley、Highwire Press 和 Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews。我们的主要重点是确定发育性脑病和癫痫性脑病患者(人群)中大脑视觉障碍(Condition)的患病率。为确保清晰,我们将对所纳入研究的偏倚风险进行叙述性总结。Cochrane Q 统计量将用于评估研究之间的异质性。如果定量综述包括 10 项以上的研究,则将通过亚组和元回归分析来调查潜在的异质性来源。此外,还将进行元(偏倚)分析。所有结果的证据质量将采用建议分级评估开发与评价(GRADE)工作组的方法进行评估:本方案概述了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,旨在确定、收集、评估和整合与 DEE 患者中 CVI 患病率相关的流行病学知识。据我们所知,还没有其他系统综述和荟萃分析涉及这一特定问题。研究结果将为了解问题的严重程度、勾勒未来的研究方向以及提出早期识别策略的必要性提供有用的信息:本系统综述协议已在 PROSPERO 注册(CRD42023448910)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Barriers and facilitators to using procedural pain treatments in pediatric patients (under 1 year old): protocol for a mixed studies systematic review with a narrative synthesis. Exploring validated strategies for screening for eating disorders in adolescents and adults in primary health care: a scoping review protocol. Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences. Choice of primary healthcare providers among population in urban areas of low- and middle-income countries-a protocol for systematic review of literature. Computer-assisted screening in systematic evidence synthesis requires robust and well-evaluated stopping criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1