Social media and urology: The good, the bad and the ugly.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologia Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1177/03915603241273885
Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Vineet Gauhar, Etienne Xavier Keller, Vincent De Coninck, Ali Talyshinskii, Alba Sierra, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Lazaros Tzelves, Mariela Corrales, Esteban Emiliani, Christian Beisland, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"Social media and urology: The good, the bad and the ugly.","authors":"Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Vineet Gauhar, Etienne Xavier Keller, Vincent De Coninck, Ali Talyshinskii, Alba Sierra, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Lazaros Tzelves, Mariela Corrales, Esteban Emiliani, Christian Beisland, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.1177/03915603241273885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social media (SoMe) is now a core part of modern-day life with increased use among both patients and urologists. The interplay of SoMe between these two parties is complex. From a patient perspective, SoMe platforms can serve as educational tools as well as communication portals to support networks and patient communities. However, studies report the educational value of content online is often poor and may contain misinformation. For urologists, SoMe can lead to research collaborations, networking and educational content but areas of concern include the potential negative impact SoMe can have on mental health and sharing of patient images without appropriate consent. This review serves to provide an overview of the interaction between SoMe and urology practice and provide practical guidance to navigating it.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"659-664"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241273885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media (SoMe) is now a core part of modern-day life with increased use among both patients and urologists. The interplay of SoMe between these two parties is complex. From a patient perspective, SoMe platforms can serve as educational tools as well as communication portals to support networks and patient communities. However, studies report the educational value of content online is often poor and may contain misinformation. For urologists, SoMe can lead to research collaborations, networking and educational content but areas of concern include the potential negative impact SoMe can have on mental health and sharing of patient images without appropriate consent. This review serves to provide an overview of the interaction between SoMe and urology practice and provide practical guidance to navigating it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体与泌尿外科:好、坏、丑。
社交媒体 (SoMe) 如今已成为现代生活的核心部分,患者和泌尿科医生都越来越多地使用社交媒体。SoMe 在双方之间的相互作用十分复杂。从患者的角度来看,SoMe 平台既可以作为教育工具,也可以作为支持网络和患者社区的交流门户。然而,研究报告显示,在线内容的教育价值往往很低,而且可能包含错误信息。对于泌尿科医生来说,SoMe 可以带来研究合作、网络和教育内容,但令人担忧的方面包括 SoMe 对心理健康的潜在负面影响以及未经适当同意共享患者图像。本综述旨在概述 SoMe 与泌尿外科实践之间的互动关系,并为如何驾驭 SoMe 提供实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for benign uretero-enteric anastomotic strictures after open radical cystectomy and ileal conduit. On integrative analysis of multi-level gene expression data in Kidney cancer subgrouping. A new approach to repair recurrent vescicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical prostatectomy: The use of prerectal access. Potential value of Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 score in prediction of final cancer pathology parameters in radical prostatectomy patients. Retrograde urethrography (RUG) combined with voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) versus surgical findings in assessment of urethral strictures length.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1