Acupuncture before planned admission for induction of labor (ACUPUNT study): a randomized controlled trial

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101477
{"title":"Acupuncture before planned admission for induction of labor (ACUPUNT study): a randomized controlled trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The increase in the use of induction of labor is a worldwide phenomenon in the current management of labor and delivery in Western societies, with approximately one out of every 4 pregnancies undergoing this procedure This has led women to seek various methods for stimulation of the onset of labor. Some data suggest that the use of acupuncture for favoring spontaneous labor onset could reduce the number of inductions of labor procedures. However, good quality evidence in this respect is not yet available.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture using a filiform needle to induce spontaneous onset of labor in women with a scheduled induction of labor date and assess the safety and satisfaction of women undergoing acupuncture.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled, parallel-arm, unmasked trial in 3 hospitals in Spain. Eligible participants were women older than 18 years with a singleton pregnancy and a cephalic presentation, scheduled for induction of labor following center-specific protocols. Participants were randomly allocated to one of 2 groups: the intervention group, which underwent acupuncture sessions for a maximum of 4 days prior to the scheduled induction of labor, or the control group, which received no specific prelabor intervention. The primary study outcome was the proportion of women admitted because of spontaneous onset of labor or premature rupture of membranes before or the day of the scheduled induction of labor.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between November 2017 and June 2023, 212 women were recruited and included in the analysis (106 in the acupuncture group and 106 in the control group). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the baseline demographic characteristics. Regarding the primary outcome, 65.1% (69/106) of women in the acupuncture group and 39.6% (42/106) in the control group were admitted for spontaneous onset of labor or premature rupture of membranes (<em>P</em>&lt;.001). Overall, women in the intervention group were admitted 1.25 days before (SD 1.4) their scheduled induction of labor date compared to 0.67 days (SD 1.15) for those in the control group (<em>P</em>=.001). The median time from recruitment to hospitalization was 4.48 days for the acupuncture group and 5.33 days for the control group (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.77, <em>P</em>=.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the time from admission to delivery or the cesarean delivery rate. Nor were there differences in the rates of maternal or neonatal outcomes, and no maternal or fetal deaths occurred in either group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Acupuncture with filiform needles, administered 4 days prior to scheduled induction of labor increased admission for spontaneous onset of labor and premature rupture of membranes before the induction of labor date.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933324002039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The increase in the use of induction of labor is a worldwide phenomenon in the current management of labor and delivery in Western societies, with approximately one out of every 4 pregnancies undergoing this procedure This has led women to seek various methods for stimulation of the onset of labor. Some data suggest that the use of acupuncture for favoring spontaneous labor onset could reduce the number of inductions of labor procedures. However, good quality evidence in this respect is not yet available.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture using a filiform needle to induce spontaneous onset of labor in women with a scheduled induction of labor date and assess the safety and satisfaction of women undergoing acupuncture.

Study Design

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled, parallel-arm, unmasked trial in 3 hospitals in Spain. Eligible participants were women older than 18 years with a singleton pregnancy and a cephalic presentation, scheduled for induction of labor following center-specific protocols. Participants were randomly allocated to one of 2 groups: the intervention group, which underwent acupuncture sessions for a maximum of 4 days prior to the scheduled induction of labor, or the control group, which received no specific prelabor intervention. The primary study outcome was the proportion of women admitted because of spontaneous onset of labor or premature rupture of membranes before or the day of the scheduled induction of labor.

Results

Between November 2017 and June 2023, 212 women were recruited and included in the analysis (106 in the acupuncture group and 106 in the control group). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the baseline demographic characteristics. Regarding the primary outcome, 65.1% (69/106) of women in the acupuncture group and 39.6% (42/106) in the control group were admitted for spontaneous onset of labor or premature rupture of membranes (P<.001). Overall, women in the intervention group were admitted 1.25 days before (SD 1.4) their scheduled induction of labor date compared to 0.67 days (SD 1.15) for those in the control group (P=.001). The median time from recruitment to hospitalization was 4.48 days for the acupuncture group and 5.33 days for the control group (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.77, P=.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the time from admission to delivery or the cesarean delivery rate. Nor were there differences in the rates of maternal or neonatal outcomes, and no maternal or fetal deaths occurred in either group.

Conclusion

Acupuncture with filiform needles, administered 4 days prior to scheduled induction of labor increased admission for spontaneous onset of labor and premature rupture of membranes before the induction of labor date.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计划入院引产前的针灸(ACUPUNT 研究):随机对照试验:AJOG 一览。
背景:引产是目前西方社会分娩管理中的一个世界性现象,大约每四名孕妇中就有一名需要接受引产手术。一些数据表明,使用针灸促进自然分娩可以减少引产的次数。然而,目前还没有这方面的高质量证据:本研究的目的是评估使用丝状针针灸诱导预定引产日期的妇女自然临产的有效性,并评估接受针灸的妇女的安全性和满意度:我们在西班牙的三家医院开展了一项多中心、随机对照、平行臂、无掩蔽试验。符合条件的参试者均为 18 岁以上的单胎妊娠头位妊娠妇女,并按照各中心的具体方案安排引产。参与者被随机分配到两组中的一组:干预组,在预定引产前接受最多四天的针灸治疗;对照组,不接受特定的产前干预。主要研究结果是在预定引产前或当天因自然临产或胎膜早破而入院的妇女比例:2017年11月至2023年6月期间,共招募了212名妇女并纳入分析(针灸组106人,对照组106人)。两组的基线人口统计学特征无明显差异。在主要结果方面,针灸组有 65.1%(69/106)的产妇因自然临产或胎膜早破入院,对照组有 39.6%(42/106)的产妇因自然临产或胎膜早破入院(P < 0.001)。总体而言,干预组妇女在预定引产日期前 1.25 天(标准差 1.4)入院,而对照组妇女在预定引产日期前 0.67 天(标准差 1.15)入院(P=0.001)。从招募到住院的中位时间,针灸组为 4.48 天,对照组为 5.33 天(HR 0.52,95% CI 0.35 - 0.77,P=0.001)。在从入院到分娩的时间或剖宫产率方面,两组之间没有明显差异。两组产妇和新生儿的结局也无差异,均无产妇或胎儿死亡:结论:在计划引产前 4 天针刺丝状针,可增加引产日期前自然临产和胎膜早破的入院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
期刊最新文献
Activity restriction and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes Oxytocin regimen used for induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes. Results of the RE-DINO multicenter randomized trial on the repeated use of vaginal dinoprostone (Propess®) for labor induction in patients at term. Corrigendum to ‘Prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies’ American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM/ Volume 4 (2022) 100551 Validation of the PROMIS© Medication Adherence Scale for Pregnant Patients Taking Aspirin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1