Understanding Older Adults' Experiences With a Digital Health Platform in General Practice: Qualitative Interview Study.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.2196/59168
Hanna R Knotnerus, Hà T N Ngo, Otto R Maarsingh, Vincent A van Vugt
{"title":"Understanding Older Adults' Experiences With a Digital Health Platform in General Practice: Qualitative Interview Study.","authors":"Hanna R Knotnerus, Hà T N Ngo, Otto R Maarsingh, Vincent A van Vugt","doi":"10.2196/59168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In our aging population, primary care is under pressure to remain accessible to all. Effective use of digital health care could potentially lower general practitioners' (GPs) workload. Some general practices are already implementing a digital health platform as a primary method to contact their patients. However, it is unknown how older people experience this novel way to communicate with their GP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to study the experiences of patients aged 65 years and older in general practices who use digital health as a primary communication tool. The secondary aims were to identify barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health care and whether a practice focus on digital health influences older patients' choice to enlist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We invited all patients aged 65 years and older at 2 general practices in Amsterdam that work with a novel digital health platform. We used purposive sampling to select a heterogeneous group of patients in terms of age, sex, level of education, digital literacy, and experiences with the digital app of their general practice. We conducted 18 semistructured interviews from May through July 2023. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We generated three themes: (1) experiences of older people with digital health care in general practice, (2) impact of individual factors on digital health experiences, and (3) reasons for choosing a digitally oriented general practice. Participants reported both positive and negative experiences. The main perceived advantages of the digital health platform were increased accessibility, direct GP contact without an intermediary, and saving time through asynchronous communication. The disadvantages mentioned were log-in difficulties and problems with the automated explanatory questionnaire. Individual factors such as age, digital literacy, and expectations of general practice care seemed to impact people's experiences and could act as barriers or facilitators for using digital health. Reasons for older patients to enlist at a general practice were mainly practical. The digital orientation of the practice hardly played a role in this choice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Older patients in general practice see benefits to using a digital health platform that offers 2-way chat-based communication between the patient and GP. We found that individual factors such as skills, norms and values, attitudes toward digitalization, and expectations of general practice care impacted older patients' experiences with digital health care. For many older participants, the digital profile of the general practice did not play a role in their choice to enlist. Further improvement of digital health platforms will be necessary to ensure digital health for all in general practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e59168"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In our aging population, primary care is under pressure to remain accessible to all. Effective use of digital health care could potentially lower general practitioners' (GPs) workload. Some general practices are already implementing a digital health platform as a primary method to contact their patients. However, it is unknown how older people experience this novel way to communicate with their GP.

Objective: The aim of this study was to study the experiences of patients aged 65 years and older in general practices who use digital health as a primary communication tool. The secondary aims were to identify barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health care and whether a practice focus on digital health influences older patients' choice to enlist.

Methods: We invited all patients aged 65 years and older at 2 general practices in Amsterdam that work with a novel digital health platform. We used purposive sampling to select a heterogeneous group of patients in terms of age, sex, level of education, digital literacy, and experiences with the digital app of their general practice. We conducted 18 semistructured interviews from May through July 2023. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed.

Results: We generated three themes: (1) experiences of older people with digital health care in general practice, (2) impact of individual factors on digital health experiences, and (3) reasons for choosing a digitally oriented general practice. Participants reported both positive and negative experiences. The main perceived advantages of the digital health platform were increased accessibility, direct GP contact without an intermediary, and saving time through asynchronous communication. The disadvantages mentioned were log-in difficulties and problems with the automated explanatory questionnaire. Individual factors such as age, digital literacy, and expectations of general practice care seemed to impact people's experiences and could act as barriers or facilitators for using digital health. Reasons for older patients to enlist at a general practice were mainly practical. The digital orientation of the practice hardly played a role in this choice.

Conclusions: Older patients in general practice see benefits to using a digital health platform that offers 2-way chat-based communication between the patient and GP. We found that individual factors such as skills, norms and values, attitudes toward digitalization, and expectations of general practice care impacted older patients' experiences with digital health care. For many older participants, the digital profile of the general practice did not play a role in their choice to enlist. Further improvement of digital health platforms will be necessary to ensure digital health for all in general practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解老年人使用全科数字健康平台的体验:定性访谈研究。
背景:随着人口老龄化的加剧,初级保健面临着向所有人提供的压力。有效利用数字医疗有可能减轻全科医生的工作量。一些全科医生已经开始使用数字医疗平台作为联系病人的主要方式。然而,老年人如何体验这种与全科医生沟通的新方式尚不得而知:本研究旨在了解全科诊所中 65 岁及以上患者使用数字健康作为主要沟通工具的体验。次要目的是确定使用数字医疗的障碍和促进因素,以及诊所对数字医疗的关注是否会影响老年患者的选择:我们邀请了阿姆斯特丹两家使用新型数字健康平台的全科诊所中所有 65 岁及以上的患者。我们采用目的性抽样,从年龄、性别、教育水平、数字素养以及使用综合诊所数字应用程序的经验等方面选择了不同的患者群体。从 2023 年 5 月到 7 月,我们进行了 18 次半结构式访谈。我们对所有访谈进行了录音、转录、编码和主题分析:我们提出了三个主题:(1)老年人在全科数字医疗方面的经验;(2)个人因素对数字医疗经验的影响;(3)选择以数字为导向的全科诊所的原因。参与者报告了积极和消极的体验。他们认为数字医疗平台的主要优点是提高了可访问性、无需中间人即可与全科医生直接联系,以及通过异步通信节省了时间。提到的缺点是登录困难和自动解释性问卷的问题。年龄、数字素养和对全科医生护理的期望等个人因素似乎会影响人们的体验,并可能成为使用数字医疗的障碍或促进因素。老年患者在全科诊所就诊的原因主要是实用性。诊所的数字导向在这一选择中几乎不起作用:全科诊所的老年患者认为使用数字健康平台有好处,因为该平台提供患者与全科医生之间的双向聊天交流。我们发现,技能、规范和价值观、对数字化的态度以及对全科医生护理的期望等个人因素影响着老年患者对数字医疗的体验。对许多老年参与者来说,全科医生的数字化情况并没有影响他们的选择。有必要进一步改进数字医疗平台,以确保全科医生人人享有数字医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Functional Monitoring of Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Based on Multidimensional Wearable Plantar Pressure Features: Cross-Sectional Study. Social Robots and Sensors for Enhanced Aging at Home: Mixed Methods Study With a Focus on Mobility and Socioeconomic Factors. Subjective Cognitive Concerns are Associated with Worse Performance on Mobile-App Based Cognitive Assessment: An Observational Study in Cognitively Normal Older Adults. Examining Whether Patient Portal and Video Visit Use Differs by Race and Ethnicity Among Older Adults in a US Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Cross-Sectional Electronic Health Record and Survey-Based Study. Exploring the Landscape of Standards and Guidelines in AgeTech Design and Development: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1