Nonresponse to an item assessing firearm ownership: Associations with suicide risk and emotional distress.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1111/sltb.13121
Samantha E Daruwala, C Rosie Bauder, Melanie L Bozzay, Craig J Bryan
{"title":"Nonresponse to an item assessing firearm ownership: Associations with suicide risk and emotional distress.","authors":"Samantha E Daruwala, C Rosie Bauder, Melanie L Bozzay, Craig J Bryan","doi":"10.1111/sltb.13121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Firearms account for more than half of suicide deaths in the United States (US) and both ownership and access are associated with increased risk of intentional and unintentional injury. Despite evidence linking ownership and access to suicide risk, individuals may be reticent to answer questionnaire items assessing ownership. The current study examined characteristics of individuals who do not provide a response (nonresponders) to a firearm ownership item in a community sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from a cross-sectional online survey of 10,625 US adults. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine demographic, emotional distress, and suicide risk differences across three groups (firearm owners, nonowners, and nonresponders).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nonresponders were significantly younger, more likely to be female and non-White than firearm owners and nonowners. Nonresponders were less likely to endorse recent suicidal ideation and probable PTSD than firearm owners, but more likely to endorse probable PTSD than nonowners. Firearm owners were significantly more likely to report several correlates of suicide risk than nonowners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonresponders may be a unique subgroup with distinct demographic, emotional distress, and suicide risk profiles compared to both firearm owners and nonowners. Implications of these findings for future directions are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Firearms account for more than half of suicide deaths in the United States (US) and both ownership and access are associated with increased risk of intentional and unintentional injury. Despite evidence linking ownership and access to suicide risk, individuals may be reticent to answer questionnaire items assessing ownership. The current study examined characteristics of individuals who do not provide a response (nonresponders) to a firearm ownership item in a community sample.

Methods: Data were collected from a cross-sectional online survey of 10,625 US adults. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to examine demographic, emotional distress, and suicide risk differences across three groups (firearm owners, nonowners, and nonresponders).

Results: Nonresponders were significantly younger, more likely to be female and non-White than firearm owners and nonowners. Nonresponders were less likely to endorse recent suicidal ideation and probable PTSD than firearm owners, but more likely to endorse probable PTSD than nonowners. Firearm owners were significantly more likely to report several correlates of suicide risk than nonowners.

Conclusions: Nonresponders may be a unique subgroup with distinct demographic, emotional distress, and suicide risk profiles compared to both firearm owners and nonowners. Implications of these findings for future directions are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对评估枪支拥有情况的项目无响应:与自杀风险和情绪困扰的关联。
导言:在美国,枪支占自杀死亡人数的一半以上,拥有和使用枪支都会增加故意和意外伤害的风险。尽管有证据表明拥有和使用枪支与自杀风险有关,但个人可能不愿回答评估枪支拥有情况的问卷项目。本研究调查了社区样本中对枪支所有权项目不作回答(未作答者)的个人特征:数据来自一项横断面在线调查,调查对象为 10625 名美国成年人。对三个群体(枪支拥有者、未拥有者和未回复者)的人口统计学、情绪困扰和自杀风险差异进行了单变量和多变量分析:与枪支所有者和非所有者相比,未回复者明显更年轻,更有可能是女性和非白人。与枪支所有者相比,未应答者更不可能认同近期有自杀倾向和可能患有创伤后应激障碍,但与非枪支所有者相比,未应答者更可能认同可能患有创伤后应激障碍。与非枪支所有者相比,枪支所有者更有可能报告几种自杀风险相关因素:与枪支拥有者和非枪支拥有者相比,非枪支拥有者可能是一个独特的亚群体,他们在人口统计学、情绪困扰和自杀风险方面都有独特的特征。本文讨论了这些发现对未来发展方向的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Development of a peer-delivered lethal means counseling intervention for firearm owning veterans: Peer engagement and exploration of responsibility and safety (PEERS). Risk of self-harm and suicide on reaching the age at which a parent died by suicide or other causes: A Danish, population-based self-controlled case series study. Examining whether method of suicide exposure and closeness to decedent relate to firearm storage practices. An integrated alcohol and suicide intervention for adolescents in inpatient psychiatric treatment. Collaboration and consent in decisions to initiate emergency dispatches for suicide risk: A national qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1