The Impact of the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit on Quaternary Care Accessibility for Rural Patients: A Comparative Analysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/9599855
Quincy K Tran, Anastasia Ternovskaia, Jessica V Downing, Minahil Cheema, Taylor Kowansky, Isha Vashee, Jasjot Sayal, Jasmine Wu, Aditi Singh, Daniel J Haase
{"title":"The Impact of the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit on Quaternary Care Accessibility for Rural Patients: A Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Quincy K Tran, Anastasia Ternovskaia, Jessica V Downing, Minahil Cheema, Taylor Kowansky, Isha Vashee, Jasjot Sayal, Jasmine Wu, Aditi Singh, Daniel J Haase","doi":"10.1155/2024/9599855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research suggests that patients from rural areas who are critically ill with complex medical needs or require time-sensitive subspecialty interventions face worse healthcare outcomes and delays in care when compared to those from urban areas. The critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU) at our quaternary care center was established to expedite the transfer of critically ill patients or those who need time-sensitive intervention. This study investigates if disparities exist in treatments and outcomes among patients transferred to the CCRU from rural versus urban hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of adult, nontrauma patients admitted to the CCRU via interhospital transfer from outside facilities from January 1 to December 31, 2018. Patients transferred from within our institution or with missing clinical data were excluded. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to measure the association between patients' demographic and clinical factors with in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 1381 nontrauma patients, and 484 (35%) were from rural areas. Median age was 59 [47-69], and 629 (46%) were female. Median sequential organ failure assessment was 3 ([1-6], <i>p</i>=0.062) for both patients transferred from urban and rural hospitals. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to most demographic and clinical factors, as well as types of interventions after CCRU arrival, including emergent surgical interventions within 12 hours of arrival at the CCRU. Rural patients were more likely to be transferred for care by the acute care emergency surgery service than were patients from urban areas and were transferred over a significantly greater distance (difference of 53 kilometers (km), 95% CI: -58.9-51.7 km, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Transfer from rural areas was not associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.60, 1.36; <i>P</i>=0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thirty-five percent of patients transferred to the CCRU came from rural areas, which house 25% of the state population of Maryland. Patients transferred from rural counties to the CCRU faced greater transport distances, but they received the same level of care upon arrival at the CCRU and had the same odds of in-hospital mortality as patients transferred from urban hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9599855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research suggests that patients from rural areas who are critically ill with complex medical needs or require time-sensitive subspecialty interventions face worse healthcare outcomes and delays in care when compared to those from urban areas. The critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU) at our quaternary care center was established to expedite the transfer of critically ill patients or those who need time-sensitive intervention. This study investigates if disparities exist in treatments and outcomes among patients transferred to the CCRU from rural versus urban hospitals.

Methods: This is a retrospective study of adult, nontrauma patients admitted to the CCRU via interhospital transfer from outside facilities from January 1 to December 31, 2018. Patients transferred from within our institution or with missing clinical data were excluded. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to measure the association between patients' demographic and clinical factors with in-hospital mortality.

Results: We analyzed 1381 nontrauma patients, and 484 (35%) were from rural areas. Median age was 59 [47-69], and 629 (46%) were female. Median sequential organ failure assessment was 3 ([1-6], p=0.062) for both patients transferred from urban and rural hospitals. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to most demographic and clinical factors, as well as types of interventions after CCRU arrival, including emergent surgical interventions within 12 hours of arrival at the CCRU. Rural patients were more likely to be transferred for care by the acute care emergency surgery service than were patients from urban areas and were transferred over a significantly greater distance (difference of 53 kilometers (km), 95% CI: -58.9-51.7 km, P < 0.001). Transfer from rural areas was not associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.60, 1.36; P=0.63).

Conclusion: Thirty-five percent of patients transferred to the CCRU came from rural areas, which house 25% of the state population of Maryland. Patients transferred from rural counties to the CCRU faced greater transport distances, but they received the same level of care upon arrival at the CCRU and had the same odds of in-hospital mortality as patients transferred from urban hospitals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护复苏室对农村患者获得四级护理的影响:比较分析。
背景:以往的研究表明,与来自城市地区的患者相比,来自农村地区的具有复杂医疗需求的危重病人或需要时间敏感的亚专科干预的患者面临着更差的医疗结果和护理延误。我们的四级医疗中心设立了重症监护复苏单元(CCRU),以加快危重病人或需要时间敏感性干预的病人的转院速度。本研究调查了从农村医院转入 CCRU 的患者与城市医院转入 CCRU 的患者在治疗和结果方面是否存在差异:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为2018年1月1日至12月31日期间通过院际转院从外部机构转入CCRU的成年非创伤患者。从本机构内部转院或临床数据缺失的患者被排除在外。我们对患者的人口统计学和临床因素与院内死亡率之间的关系进行了多变量逻辑回归:我们分析了 1381 名非创伤患者,其中 484 人(35%)来自农村地区。中位年龄为 59 岁 [47-69],629 人(46%)为女性。转自城市医院和农村医院的患者器官功能衰竭评估中位数均为 3([1-6],P=0.062)。在大多数人口统计学和临床因素以及到达 CCRU 后的干预类型(包括到达 CCRU 后 12 小时内的紧急外科干预)方面,两组之间没有明显差异。与来自城市地区的患者相比,农村患者更有可能转到急诊外科接受治疗,而且转院距离明显更远(相差53公里,95% CI:-58.9-51.7公里,P<0.001)。从农村地区转院与院内死亡率的增加无关(OR:0.90,95% CI:0.60,1.36;P=0.63):35%转入CCRU的患者来自农村地区,而农村地区人口占马里兰州总人口的25%。从农村地区转入CCRU的患者面临着更远的转运距离,但他们在到达CCRU后得到的护理水平相同,院内死亡率与从城市医院转入的患者相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit on Quaternary Care Accessibility for Rural Patients: A Comparative Analysis. Predictive Value of Red Cell Distribution Width-to-Platelet Ratio Combined with Procalcitonin in 28-day Mortality for Patients with Sepsis. Burden of Respiratory Disease in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Experience from a PICU of a Tertiary Care Center in Pakistan. Characteristics and Cluster Analysis of 18,030 Sepsis Patients Who Were Admitted to Thailand's Largest National Tertiary Referral Center during 2014-2020 to Identify Distinct Subtypes of Sepsis in Thai Population. Association between Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and In-Hospital Mortality among Congestive Heart Failure Patients with Diabetes among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1