Jinyao Liu, Yi Tang, Peiyao Zheng, Mingsheng Chen, Lei Si
{"title":"Inequalities in health care use among patients with arthritis in China: using Andersen's Behavioral Model.","authors":"Jinyao Liu, Yi Tang, Peiyao Zheng, Mingsheng Chen, Lei Si","doi":"10.1186/s12962-024-00572-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study sought to assess socioeconomic-related inequalities in health care use among arthritis patients in China and to analyze factors associated with this disparity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. 3255 arthritis patients were included. The annual per capita household expenditure was used to divide individuals into five categories. We calculated actual, need-predicted, and need-standardized distributions of health care use by socioeconomic groups among people with arthritis. The concentration index (Cl) was used to assess inequalities in health service use. Influencing factors of inequalities were measured with the decomposition method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The outpatient and inpatient service use rates among 3255 arthritis patients were 23.13% and 21.41%, respectively. The CIs for actual outpatient and inpatient services use were 0.0449 and 0.0985, respectively. The standardized CIs for both outpatient and inpatient services use increase (CI for outpatient services use = 0.0537; CI for inpatient services use = 0.1260), indicating the emergence of a significant pro-rich inequity. Annual per capita household expenditure was the chief positive contributor to inequity for both outpatient (104.45%) and inpatient services use (105.74%), followed by infrequently social interaction (22.60% for outpatient services use) and Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI) (11.90% for inpatient services use). By contrast, UEBMI also provided a high negative contribution to outpatient services use (-15.99%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are significant pro-rich inequalities in outpatient and inpatient services use among patients with arthritis, which are exacerbated by widening economic gaps. Interventions to address inequalities should start by improving the economic situation of lower socioeconomic households.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"22 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00572-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study sought to assess socioeconomic-related inequalities in health care use among arthritis patients in China and to analyze factors associated with this disparity.
Methods: This study used data from the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. 3255 arthritis patients were included. The annual per capita household expenditure was used to divide individuals into five categories. We calculated actual, need-predicted, and need-standardized distributions of health care use by socioeconomic groups among people with arthritis. The concentration index (Cl) was used to assess inequalities in health service use. Influencing factors of inequalities were measured with the decomposition method.
Results: The outpatient and inpatient service use rates among 3255 arthritis patients were 23.13% and 21.41%, respectively. The CIs for actual outpatient and inpatient services use were 0.0449 and 0.0985, respectively. The standardized CIs for both outpatient and inpatient services use increase (CI for outpatient services use = 0.0537; CI for inpatient services use = 0.1260), indicating the emergence of a significant pro-rich inequity. Annual per capita household expenditure was the chief positive contributor to inequity for both outpatient (104.45%) and inpatient services use (105.74%), followed by infrequently social interaction (22.60% for outpatient services use) and Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI) (11.90% for inpatient services use). By contrast, UEBMI also provided a high negative contribution to outpatient services use (-15.99%).
Conclusions: There are significant pro-rich inequalities in outpatient and inpatient services use among patients with arthritis, which are exacerbated by widening economic gaps. Interventions to address inequalities should start by improving the economic situation of lower socioeconomic households.
背景:本研究旨在评估中国关节炎患者在使用医疗服务时与社会经济相关的不平等现象,并分析与这种不平等现象相关的因素:本研究旨在评估中国关节炎患者在使用医疗服务时与社会经济相关的不平等现象,并分析与这种不平等现象相关的因素:本研究使用了 2018 年中国健康与退休纵向研究的数据。共纳入 3255 名关节炎患者。我们使用家庭年人均支出将个人分为五类。我们计算了关节炎患者中各社会经济群体的实际、需求预测和需求标准化医疗保健使用分布。集中指数(Cl)用于评估医疗服务使用的不平等。用分解法测量了不平等的影响因素:3255名关节炎患者的门诊和住院服务使用率分别为23.13%和21.41%。实际门诊和住院服务使用率的 CI 分别为 0.0449 和 0.0985。门诊病人和住院病人服务使用的标准化 CI 值均有所增加(门诊病人服务使用的 CI 值=0.0537;住院病人服务使用的 CI 值=0.1260),这表明出现了明显的贫富不均现象。家庭人均年支出是造成门诊(104.45%)和住院(105.74%)服务使用不公平的主要积极因素,其次是不经常的社会交往(门诊服务使用的 22.60%)和城镇职工基本医疗保险(住院服务使用的 11.90%)。相比之下,城镇职工基本医疗保险(UEBMI)对门诊服务使用的负贡献率也很高(-15.99%):结论:关节炎患者在门诊和住院服务的使用方面存在严重的贫富不均,而经济差距的扩大又加剧了这种不平等。解决不平等问题的干预措施应从改善社会经济地位较低家庭的经济状况入手。
期刊介绍:
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.