Long-Term Care Use Among Older Migrants in the Netherlands: What to Expect in the Next Decade?

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging & Social Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1080/08959420.2024.2384195
Nina Conkova, Thijs van den Broek
{"title":"Long-Term Care Use Among Older Migrants in the Netherlands: What to Expect in the Next Decade?","authors":"Nina Conkova, Thijs van den Broek","doi":"10.1080/08959420.2024.2384195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of older adults in the Netherlands is growing rapidly, and an increasing share of them is foreign-born. This may have implications for long-term care (LTC) demand. This study provides insights into older migrants' current and future use of LTC provisions under the Dutch long-term care act (LTCA). We distinguish three types of LTC and six groups of older migrants and analyze register data of all foreign-born older adults. Descriptive statistics for the 2016-2022 period and logistic regression analyses show considerable heterogeneity regarding the LTC-services used and the origin of care users. Most notably, Moroccan and Turkish older adults are least likely to use residential care and more likely to use personal care budgets. By combining our models' results with population projections, we project that older migrants' use of home-based care and personal budgets will increase rapidly in the next decade. Migrants with western and Surinamese origin will most often use LTC. Although the demand for residential care will rise less markedly, residential care will remain most used by older migrants under the LTCA. The rising demand for home-based care calls for policy efforts accommodating flexibility, room for differences, and grounds for establishing trustworthy relationships between all involved actors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging & Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2024.2384195","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of older adults in the Netherlands is growing rapidly, and an increasing share of them is foreign-born. This may have implications for long-term care (LTC) demand. This study provides insights into older migrants' current and future use of LTC provisions under the Dutch long-term care act (LTCA). We distinguish three types of LTC and six groups of older migrants and analyze register data of all foreign-born older adults. Descriptive statistics for the 2016-2022 period and logistic regression analyses show considerable heterogeneity regarding the LTC-services used and the origin of care users. Most notably, Moroccan and Turkish older adults are least likely to use residential care and more likely to use personal care budgets. By combining our models' results with population projections, we project that older migrants' use of home-based care and personal budgets will increase rapidly in the next decade. Migrants with western and Surinamese origin will most often use LTC. Although the demand for residential care will rise less markedly, residential care will remain most used by older migrants under the LTCA. The rising demand for home-based care calls for policy efforts accommodating flexibility, room for differences, and grounds for establishing trustworthy relationships between all involved actors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰老年移民使用长期护理的情况:未来十年会发生什么?
荷兰的老年人数量正在迅速增长,其中越来越多的人在国外出生。这可能会对长期护理(LTC)需求产生影响。本研究深入探讨了老年移民目前和未来对荷兰长期护理法案(LTCA)规定的长期护理条款的使用情况。我们区分了三种类型的长期护理和六组老年移民,并分析了所有外国出生的老年人的登记数据。2016-2022 年期间的描述性统计和逻辑回归分析表明,在所使用的长期护理服务和护理使用者的来源方面存在相当大的异质性。最值得注意的是,摩洛哥和土耳其老年人最不可能使用寄宿护理,而更有可能使用个人护理预算。通过将我们的模型结果与人口预测相结合,我们预测老年移民对家庭护理和个人护理预算的使用将在未来十年内迅速增加。原籍西方和苏里南的移民将最常使用长期护理服务。虽然住院护理需求的增长不会那么明显,但根据《长 期护理法》,住院护理仍将是老年移民使用最多的护理方式。对居家护理的需求不断增加,这就要求在政策上要有灵活性,为差异留有余地,并为在所有相关行为者之间建立值得信赖的关系提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging & Social Policy offers a platform for insightful contributions from an international and interdisciplinary group of policy analysts and scholars. It provides an in-depth examination and analysis of critical phenomena that impact aging and the development and implementation of programs for the elderly from a global perspective, with a broad scope that encompasses not only the United States but also regions including Europe, the Middle East, Australia, Latin America, Asia, and the Asia-Pacific rim. The journal regularly addresses a wide array of issues such as long-term services and supports, home- and community-based care, nursing-home care, assisted living, long-term care financing, financial security, employment and training, public and private pension coverage, housing, transportation, health care access, financing, and quality, family dynamics, and retirement. These topics are of significant importance to the field of aging and social policy, reflecting the journal's commitment to presenting a comprehensive view of the challenges and solutions related to aging populations around the world.
期刊最新文献
Does Social Support Alleviate the Caregiving Burden of Adult Children? Evidence from Chinese Long-Term Care Insurance Pilot Program. Mass Media Exposure Moderates the Association of Education and Wealth with Enrollment in Health Insurance Among Older Adults Aged 60 Years and Older in India. The Impact of Age-Based COVID-19 Pandemic Regulations on Older People in Turkey: A Capability Approach. Provision of Home & Community Based Services to Veterans by Race, Rurality, and Neighborhood Deprivation Index. Understanding Organizational Resilience of Care Homes for Older People During COVID-19 in China: A Qualitative Study with Post-Pandemic Policy Implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1