Permanent Indian ink tattoos for breast cancer radiotherapy: A United Kingdom study of the emotional impact on patients following radiotherapy.

Abstract

Introduction: Post-operative radiotherapy for early breast cancer is recommended for over 30,000 people every year in the United Kingdom. The majority of these patients will be advised to have radiotherapy alignment tattoos; permanent skin marks applied with Indian ink and a lancing needle, black/green/blue in colour and approximately 2 mm in diameter. The tattoos assist the therapeutic radiographers to position the patient accurately and reproducibly for each treatment fraction. The aim of this study was to investigate the emotional impact of radiotherapy tattoos on people following breast cancer radiotherapy.

Methods: An electronic questionnaire was distributed by the charitable organisation, Breast Cancer Now, to their members who had undergone radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Based on the responses to the open and closed questions, an overall impact score was assigned to each respondent, and representative quotes extracted to contextualise the themes identified. Statistical tests were performed to evaluate the relationship between overall impact scores and several variables such as age at the time of radiotherapy, skin type, and age at the time of completing the questionnaire.

Results: 204 people responded to the questionnaire. 100% had permanent Indian ink tattoos during breast cancer radiotherapy. 95% could still see the midline tattoo. 22 subthemes were identified; 4 positive, 4 neutral and 14 negative. Radiotherapy tattoos served as a constant negative reminder for 27% and affected clothing choices in 14% of respondents. 11% described feelings of 'hating' them. 6% were assigned positive overall impact scores, 43% neutral, and 51% had negative overall impact scores. The black/green/blue ink pigment used was commonly described as unnatural; contributing strongly to the negative appearance of the tattoos.

Conclusion: Permanent Indian ink tattoos have a negative impact on emotional well-being in the months and years following radiotherapy for early breast cancer for many people. In contrast, a very small minority feel positively about the tattoos.

Implications for practice: Our findings are unlikely to be unique to this diagnostic cohort and supports the need to offer alternatives that are less-impactful to the recipient, accessible for people of all skin colours, and fit-for-purpose in terms of radiotherapy set-up. Acknowledgement of the significant negative impact and collaboration between industry, healthcare professionals and patient representatives is key to identifying and implementing suitable alternatives as standard of care.