Hypocrisy moderates self-interest bias in moral character judgments.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1080/00224545.2024.2393093
Konrad Bocian, Katarzyna Myslinska Szarek, Katarzyna Miazek
{"title":"Hypocrisy moderates self-interest bias in moral character judgments.","authors":"Konrad Bocian, Katarzyna Myslinska Szarek, Katarzyna Miazek","doi":"10.1080/00224545.2024.2393093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-interest bias describes an observer's tendency to judge moral transgression leniently when they benefit from it. However, what factors moderate the self-interest bias is an open empirical question. Here, we investigated to what extent hypocrisy moderates the self-interest bias. Preregistered Study 1a (<i>N</i> = 194) and replication in Study 1b (<i>N</i> = 193) demonstrated that observers' interest impacts moral character judgments of hypocritical transgressors. This effect was explained by observers' goal attainment due to transgression (Study 2, <i>N</i> = 713) and agreement to aid observers' or ingroup interests (Study 3, <i>N</i> = 634). Importantly, transgressors' hypocrisy moderated the impact of observers' interests in moral character judgments (Studies 2 & 3). In summary, when judging hypocritical transgressors, peoples' moral character judgments tend to be biased by their or their group's interests. However, in comparison to non-hypocritical transgressors, this impact is less pronounced.</p>","PeriodicalId":48205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2024.2393093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-interest bias describes an observer's tendency to judge moral transgression leniently when they benefit from it. However, what factors moderate the self-interest bias is an open empirical question. Here, we investigated to what extent hypocrisy moderates the self-interest bias. Preregistered Study 1a (N = 194) and replication in Study 1b (N = 193) demonstrated that observers' interest impacts moral character judgments of hypocritical transgressors. This effect was explained by observers' goal attainment due to transgression (Study 2, N = 713) and agreement to aid observers' or ingroup interests (Study 3, N = 634). Importantly, transgressors' hypocrisy moderated the impact of observers' interests in moral character judgments (Studies 2 & 3). In summary, when judging hypocritical transgressors, peoples' moral character judgments tend to be biased by their or their group's interests. However, in comparison to non-hypocritical transgressors, this impact is less pronounced.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚伪调节了道德品格判断中的自利偏差。
自利偏差描述的是当观察者从中受益时,他们倾向于从宽判断道德违规行为。然而,是什么因素调节了自利偏差,这是一个有待解决的实证问题。在此,我们研究了虚伪在多大程度上调节了自利偏差。预注册研究 1a(N = 194)和重复研究 1b(N = 193)表明,观察者的兴趣会影响对虚伪越轨者的道德品质判断。观察者因越轨而实现目标(研究 2,N = 713)以及同意帮助观察者或群体利益(研究 3,N = 634)可以解释这种影响。重要的是,越轨者的虚伪性调节了观察者利益对道德品质判断的影响(研究 2 和 3)。总之,在判断虚伪的越轨者时,人们的道德品质判断往往会受到他们或他们群体利益的影响。然而,与非虚伪越轨者相比,这种影响并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social Psychology
Journal of Social Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Since John Dewey and Carl Murchison founded it in 1929, The Journal of Social Psychology has published original empirical research in all areas of basic and applied social psychology. Most articles report laboratory or field research in core areas of social and organizational psychology including the self, attribution theory, attitudes, social influence, consumer behavior, decision making, groups and teams, sterotypes and discrimination, interpersonal attraction, prosocial behavior, aggression, organizational behavior, leadership, and cross-cultural studies. Academic experts review all articles to ensure that they meet high standards.
期刊最新文献
Supervisor-subordinate fit need for autonomy and subordinate job crafting: a moderated mediation model. The nature of racial superhumanization bias. Letter labels and illusory correlation: infrequent letters bias reactions to the group. Leveraging impression management motives to increase the use of face masks. Gender-based in-group social influence can lead women to view a hostile sexist attitude as less prejudiced and more true.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1