Exploring stigma, shame, and safety behaviours in social anxiety and paranoia amongst people diagnosed with schizophrenia.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1017/S1352465824000225
Warut Aunjitsakul, Kreuwan Jongbowonwiwat, Sinead Lambe, Daniel Freeman, Hamish J McLeod, Andrew Gumley
{"title":"Exploring stigma, shame, and safety behaviours in social anxiety and paranoia amongst people diagnosed with schizophrenia.","authors":"Warut Aunjitsakul, Kreuwan Jongbowonwiwat, Sinead Lambe, Daniel Freeman, Hamish J McLeod, Andrew Gumley","doi":"10.1017/S1352465824000225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social anxiety and paranoia are connected by a shared suspicion framework. Based on cognitive-behavioural approaches, there is evidence for treating social anxiety and psychosis. However, mechanisms underlying the relationship between social anxiety and paranoia remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate mediators between social anxiety and paranoia in schizophrenia such as negative social appraisals (i.e. stigma or shame; Hypothesis 1), and safety behaviours (i.e. anxious avoidance or <i>in situ</i> safety behaviours; Hypothesis 2).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among Asian out-patients with schizophrenia (January-April 2020). Data on social anxiety, paranoia, depression, shame, stigma, anxious avoidance, and <i>in situ</i> behaviours were collected. Associations between social anxiety and paranoia were investigated using linear regressions. Mediation analysis via 10,000 bias-corrected bootstrap samples with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to test the indirect effects (<i>ab</i>) of mediators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i>=113, 59.3% male) with a mean age of 44.2 years were recruited. A linear relationship between social anxiety and paranoia was found. In multiple mediation analyses (co-varying for depression), stigma and shame (Hypothesis 1) did not show any significant indirect effects with <i>ab</i>=.004 (95%CI=-.013, .031) and -.003 (-.023, .017), respectively, whereas <i>in situ</i> behaviours (Hypothesis 2) showed a significant effect with <i>ab</i>=.110 (.038, .201) through the social anxiety-paranoia relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social anxiety and paranoia are positively correlated. <i>In situ</i> safety behaviours fully mediated the social anxiety and paranoia relationship. Targeted interventions focusing on safety behaviours could help reduce paranoia in psychosis. Symptom severity should be measured to help characterise the participants' characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":47936,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"581-595"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465824000225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social anxiety and paranoia are connected by a shared suspicion framework. Based on cognitive-behavioural approaches, there is evidence for treating social anxiety and psychosis. However, mechanisms underlying the relationship between social anxiety and paranoia remain unclear.

Aims: To investigate mediators between social anxiety and paranoia in schizophrenia such as negative social appraisals (i.e. stigma or shame; Hypothesis 1), and safety behaviours (i.e. anxious avoidance or in situ safety behaviours; Hypothesis 2).

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted among Asian out-patients with schizophrenia (January-April 2020). Data on social anxiety, paranoia, depression, shame, stigma, anxious avoidance, and in situ behaviours were collected. Associations between social anxiety and paranoia were investigated using linear regressions. Mediation analysis via 10,000 bias-corrected bootstrap samples with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to test the indirect effects (ab) of mediators.

Results: Participants (n=113, 59.3% male) with a mean age of 44.2 years were recruited. A linear relationship between social anxiety and paranoia was found. In multiple mediation analyses (co-varying for depression), stigma and shame (Hypothesis 1) did not show any significant indirect effects with ab=.004 (95%CI=-.013, .031) and -.003 (-.023, .017), respectively, whereas in situ behaviours (Hypothesis 2) showed a significant effect with ab=.110 (.038, .201) through the social anxiety-paranoia relationship.

Conclusions: Social anxiety and paranoia are positively correlated. In situ safety behaviours fully mediated the social anxiety and paranoia relationship. Targeted interventions focusing on safety behaviours could help reduce paranoia in psychosis. Symptom severity should be measured to help characterise the participants' characteristics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索被诊断为精神分裂症患者的社交焦虑和偏执中的耻辱感、羞耻感和安全行为。
背景:社交焦虑症和妄想症因共同的怀疑框架而联系在一起。基于认知行为方法,有证据表明可以治疗社交焦虑和精神病。目的:研究精神分裂症患者社交焦虑和妄想症之间的中介因素,如消极社交评价(即耻辱感或羞耻感;假设 1)和安全行为(即焦虑回避或原地安全行为;假设 2):在亚裔精神分裂症门诊患者中开展了一项横断面研究(2020 年 1 月至 4 月)。研究收集了有关社交焦虑、妄想症、抑郁、羞耻感、耻辱感、焦虑回避和原地行为的数据。通过线性回归分析了社交焦虑与偏执狂之间的关联。通过 10,000 个带有 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的偏差校正引导样本进行中介分析,以检验中介因素的间接效应 (ab):被试(113 人,59.3% 为男性)的平均年龄为 44.2 岁。研究发现,社交焦虑与偏执狂之间存在线性关系。在多重中介分析(抑郁共同变量)中,耻辱感和羞耻感(假设 1)没有显示出任何显著的间接影响,ab=.004(95%CI=-.013, .031)和-.003(-.023, .017),而原地行为(假设 2)通过社交焦虑与偏执狂之间的关系显示出显著影响,ab=.110(.038, .201):结论:社交焦虑和偏执狂呈正相关。现场安全行为对社交焦虑和妄想症之间的关系起到了充分的中介作用。以安全行为为重点的针对性干预措施有助于减少精神病患者的妄想症。应测量症状的严重程度,以帮助确定参与者的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal aimed primarily at members of the helping and teaching professions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy features original research papers, covering both experimental and clinical work, that contribute to the theory, practice and evolution of cognitive and behaviour therapy. The journal aims to reflect and influence the continuing changes in the concepts, methodology, and techniques of behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy. A particular feature of the journal is its broad ranging scope - both in terms of topics and types of study covered. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy encompasses most areas of human behaviour and experience, and represents many different research methods, from randomized controlled trials to detailed case studies.
期刊最新文献
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of Overcome Death Anxiety: an online cognitive behavioural therapy intervention in a clinical sample. Longitudinal interplay between subjective stress, anxiety, depression, and well-being in internet-based stress recovery intervention for nurses. Cognitive therapy for PTSD following multiple-trauma exposure in children and adolescents: a case series. Early maladaptive schemas, depression and anxiety in adolescent psychiatric out-patients. Post 'retirement': in memory of William 'Bill' Yule (1940-2023).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1