Increased early complications after total hip arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty in older adults with a femoral neck fracture.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.106B9.BJJ-2024-0089.R1
Masaki Hatano, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Toshiaki Isogai, Hisatoshi Ishikura, Takeyuki Tanaka, Sakae Tanaka, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"Increased early complications after total hip arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty in older adults with a femoral neck fracture.","authors":"Masaki Hatano, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Toshiaki Isogai, Hisatoshi Ishikura, Takeyuki Tanaka, Sakae Tanaka, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B9.BJJ-2024-0089.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the early postoperative mortality and morbidity in older patients with a fracture of the femoral neck, between those who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and those who underwent hemiarthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide, retrospective cohort study used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. We included older patients (aged ≥ 60 years) who underwent THA or hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture, between July 2010 and March 2022. A total of 165,123 patients were included. The THA group was younger (mean age 72.6 (SD 8.0) vs 80.7 years (SD 8.1)) and had fewer comorbidities than the hemiarthroplasty group. Patients with dementia or malignancy were excluded because they seldom undergo THA. The primary outcome measures were mortality and complications while in hospital, and secondary outcomes were readmission and reoperation within one and two years after discharge, and the costs of hospitalization. We conducted an instrumental variable analysis (IVA) using differential distance as a variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IVA analysis showed that the THA group had a significantly higher rate of complications while in hospital (risk difference 6.3% (95% CI 2.0 to 10.6); p = 0.004) than the hemiarthroplasty group, but there was no significant difference in the rate of mortality while in hospital (risk difference 0.3% (95% CI -1.7 to 2.2); p = 0.774). There was no significant difference in the rate of readmission (within one year: risk difference 1.3% (95% CI -1.9 to 4.5); p = 0.443; within two years: risk difference 0.1% (95% CI -3.2 to 3.4); p = 0.950) and reoperation (within one year: risk difference 0.3% (95% CI -0.6 to 1.1); p = 0.557; within two years: risk difference 0.1% (95% CI -0.4 to 0.7); p = 0.632) after discharge. The costs of hospitalization were significantly higher in the THA group than in the hemiarthroplasty group (difference $2,634 (95% CI $2,496 to $2,772); p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among older patients undergoing surgery for a femoral neck fracture, the risk of early complications was higher after THA than after hemiarthroplasty. Our findings should aid in clinical decision-making in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 9","pages":"986-993"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B9.BJJ-2024-0089.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the early postoperative mortality and morbidity in older patients with a fracture of the femoral neck, between those who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and those who underwent hemiarthroplasty.

Methods: This nationwide, retrospective cohort study used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. We included older patients (aged ≥ 60 years) who underwent THA or hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture, between July 2010 and March 2022. A total of 165,123 patients were included. The THA group was younger (mean age 72.6 (SD 8.0) vs 80.7 years (SD 8.1)) and had fewer comorbidities than the hemiarthroplasty group. Patients with dementia or malignancy were excluded because they seldom undergo THA. The primary outcome measures were mortality and complications while in hospital, and secondary outcomes were readmission and reoperation within one and two years after discharge, and the costs of hospitalization. We conducted an instrumental variable analysis (IVA) using differential distance as a variable.

Results: The IVA analysis showed that the THA group had a significantly higher rate of complications while in hospital (risk difference 6.3% (95% CI 2.0 to 10.6); p = 0.004) than the hemiarthroplasty group, but there was no significant difference in the rate of mortality while in hospital (risk difference 0.3% (95% CI -1.7 to 2.2); p = 0.774). There was no significant difference in the rate of readmission (within one year: risk difference 1.3% (95% CI -1.9 to 4.5); p = 0.443; within two years: risk difference 0.1% (95% CI -3.2 to 3.4); p = 0.950) and reoperation (within one year: risk difference 0.3% (95% CI -0.6 to 1.1); p = 0.557; within two years: risk difference 0.1% (95% CI -0.4 to 0.7); p = 0.632) after discharge. The costs of hospitalization were significantly higher in the THA group than in the hemiarthroplasty group (difference $2,634 (95% CI $2,496 to $2,772); p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Among older patients undergoing surgery for a femoral neck fracture, the risk of early complications was higher after THA than after hemiarthroplasty. Our findings should aid in clinical decision-making in these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨颈骨折老年人接受全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术后早期并发症增加。
目的:本研究旨在比较接受全髋关节置换术(THA)和半髋关节置换术的老年股骨颈骨折患者的术后早期死亡率和发病率:这项全国性的回顾性队列研究使用了日本诊断程序组合数据库中的数据。我们纳入了 2010 年 7 月至 2022 年 3 月间股骨颈骨折后接受 THA 或半关节成形术的老年患者(年龄≥ 60 岁)。共纳入 165 123 例患者。与半关节置换术组相比,THA组患者更年轻(平均年龄72.6岁(SD 8.0)对80.7岁(SD 8.1)),合并症更少。由于痴呆症或恶性肿瘤患者很少接受 THA,因此不包括这些患者。主要结果指标为住院期间的死亡率和并发症,次要结果指标为出院后一年和两年内的再入院率和再手术率以及住院费用。我们以差异距离为变量进行了工具变量分析(IVA):IVA分析显示,THA组住院期间的并发症发生率(风险差异为6.3% (95% CI 2.0 to 10.6); p = 0.004)明显高于半关节成形术组,但住院期间的死亡率没有明显差异(风险差异为0.3% (95% CI -1.7 to 2.2); p = 0.774)。出院后再次入院率(一年内:风险差异为 1.3% (95% CI -1.9 to 4.5);p = 0.443;两年内:风险差异为 0.1% (95% CI -3.2 to 3.4);p = 0.950)和再次手术率(一年内:风险差异为 0.3% (95% CI -0.6 to 1.1);p = 0.557;两年内:风险差异为 0.1% (95% CI -0.4 to 0.7);p = 0.632)无明显差异。THA组的住院费用明显高于半关节成形术组(差异为2,634美元(95% CI为2,496美元至2,772美元);P < 0.001):在接受股骨颈骨折手术的老年患者中,THA术后出现早期并发症的风险高于半关节置换术。我们的研究结果应有助于这些患者的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Contemporary insights into spinopelvic mechanics. Core Outcome Domains for Elbow Replacement (CODER). Defining multilevel developmental cervical spinal stenosis using MRI. Delayed fixation of distal radial fractures beyond three weeks after initial failed closed reduction increases the odds of reoperation. Detection, classification, and characterization of proximal humerus fractures on plain radiographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1