Long-term outcomes of anterior latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable subscapularis tears.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.106B9.BJJ-2024-0099.R1
Chang Hee Baek, Jung Gon Kim, Bo Taek Kim
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of anterior latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable subscapularis tears.","authors":"Chang Hee Baek, Jung Gon Kim, Bo Taek Kim","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B9.BJJ-2024-0099.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Favourable short-term outcomes have been reported following latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for patients with an irreparable subscapularis (SSC) tendon tear. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of this transfer in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study involving 30 patients with an irreparable SSC tear and those with a SSC tear combined with a reparable supraspinatus tear, who underwent a latissimus dorsi tendon transfer. Clinical scores and active range of motion (aROM), SSC-specific physical examination and the rate of return to work were assessed. Radiological assessment included recording the acromiohumeral distance (AHD), the Hamada grade of cuff tear arthropathy and the integrity of the transferred tendon. Statistical analysis compared preoperative, short-term (two years), and final follow-up at a mean of 8.7 years (7 to 10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant improvements in clinical scores, in the range and strength of internal rotation and aROM compared with the preoperative values in the 26 patients (87%) who were available for long-term follow-up. These improvements were maintained between short- and long-term follow-ups. Although there was a decreased mean AHD of 7.3 mm (SD 1.5) and an increased mean Hamada grade of 1.7 (SD 0.5) at final follow-up, the rate of progression of cuff tear arthropathy remained low-grade. Comparison between the isolated SSC and combined SSC and reparable supraspinatus tear groups showed no significant differences. At final follow-up, one patient (3.8%) had undergone revision surgery to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). No neurological complications were associated with the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Latissimus dorsi transfer for an irreparable SSC tendon tear resulted in a significant clinical improvement, particularly in pain, range and strength of internal rotation and aROM, which were maintained over a mean of 8.7 years following surgery. Given that this was a long-term outcome study, there was a low-grade progression in the rate of cuff tear arthropathy. Thus, the long-term clinical efficacy of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer in patients with irreparable SSC was confirmed as a joint-preserving procedure for these patients, suggesting it as an effective alternative to RSA in young, active patients without degenerative changes of the glenohumeral joint.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 9","pages":"957-963"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B9.BJJ-2024-0099.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Favourable short-term outcomes have been reported following latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for patients with an irreparable subscapularis (SSC) tendon tear. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of this transfer in these patients.

Methods: This was a retrospective study involving 30 patients with an irreparable SSC tear and those with a SSC tear combined with a reparable supraspinatus tear, who underwent a latissimus dorsi tendon transfer. Clinical scores and active range of motion (aROM), SSC-specific physical examination and the rate of return to work were assessed. Radiological assessment included recording the acromiohumeral distance (AHD), the Hamada grade of cuff tear arthropathy and the integrity of the transferred tendon. Statistical analysis compared preoperative, short-term (two years), and final follow-up at a mean of 8.7 years (7 to 10).

Results: There were significant improvements in clinical scores, in the range and strength of internal rotation and aROM compared with the preoperative values in the 26 patients (87%) who were available for long-term follow-up. These improvements were maintained between short- and long-term follow-ups. Although there was a decreased mean AHD of 7.3 mm (SD 1.5) and an increased mean Hamada grade of 1.7 (SD 0.5) at final follow-up, the rate of progression of cuff tear arthropathy remained low-grade. Comparison between the isolated SSC and combined SSC and reparable supraspinatus tear groups showed no significant differences. At final follow-up, one patient (3.8%) had undergone revision surgery to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). No neurological complications were associated with the procedure.

Conclusion: Latissimus dorsi transfer for an irreparable SSC tendon tear resulted in a significant clinical improvement, particularly in pain, range and strength of internal rotation and aROM, which were maintained over a mean of 8.7 years following surgery. Given that this was a long-term outcome study, there was a low-grade progression in the rate of cuff tear arthropathy. Thus, the long-term clinical efficacy of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer in patients with irreparable SSC was confirmed as a joint-preserving procedure for these patients, suggesting it as an effective alternative to RSA in young, active patients without degenerative changes of the glenohumeral joint.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前背阔肌腱转移治疗不可修复的肩胛下肌腱撕裂的长期疗效。
目的:有报道称,肩胛下肌腱(SSC)撕裂无法修复的患者进行背阔肌肌腱转移后,短期疗效良好。本研究的目的是调查这些患者进行背阔肌腱转移后的长期疗效:这是一项回顾性研究,共有30名肩胛下肌腱撕裂无法修复的患者和肩胛下肌腱撕裂合并冈上肌腱撕裂可修复的患者接受了背阔肌腱转移术。对患者的临床评分和主动活动范围(aROM)、SSC专项体格检查以及重返工作岗位的比率进行了评估。放射学评估包括记录肩肱骨距离(AHD)、肩袖撕裂关节病的Hamada分级以及转移肌腱的完整性。统计分析比较了术前、短期(两年)和平均 8.7 年(7 至 10 年)的最终随访情况:与术前相比,接受长期随访的 26 名患者(87%)的临床评分、内旋范围和力量以及 aROM 均有明显改善。这些改善在短期和长期随访中得以保持。虽然在最终随访时,AHD 的平均值减少了 7.3 mm(SD 1.5),Hamada 等级的平均值增加了 1.7(SD 0.5),但肩袖撕裂关节病的进展率仍然很低。孤立 SSC 组与合并 SSC 和可修复冈上撕裂组之间的比较结果显示无明显差异。在最后的随访中,有一名患者(3.8%)接受了反向肩关节置换术(RSA)的翻修手术。该手术未出现神经系统并发症:结论:背阔肌转移术治疗不可修复的SSC肌腱撕裂可显著改善临床症状,尤其是在疼痛、内旋范围和力量以及AROM方面,这些症状在术后平均8.7年中得以维持。考虑到这是一项长期疗效研究,袖带撕裂关节病的恶化程度较低。因此,背阔肌肌腱转移术对不可修复的SSC患者的长期临床疗效得到了证实,对这些患者来说是一种关节保留手术,这表明对于盂肱关节无退行性病变的年轻、活跃患者来说,背阔肌肌腱转移术是替代RSA的一种有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Contemporary insights into spinopelvic mechanics. Core Outcome Domains for Elbow Replacement (CODER). Defining multilevel developmental cervical spinal stenosis using MRI. Delayed fixation of distal radial fractures beyond three weeks after initial failed closed reduction increases the odds of reoperation. Detection, classification, and characterization of proximal humerus fractures on plain radiographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1