Predictors of Discharge With Supplemental Oxygen After Lobectomy for Lung Cancer.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.08.009
Lisa M Brown, Levi Bonnell, Niharika Parsons, David T Cooke, Luis A Godoy, Elizabeth A David, Paul Schipper, Thomas K Varghese, Robert Habib, Brian Mitzman
{"title":"Predictors of Discharge With Supplemental Oxygen After Lobectomy for Lung Cancer.","authors":"Lisa M Brown, Levi Bonnell, Niharika Parsons, David T Cooke, Luis A Godoy, Elizabeth A David, Paul Schipper, Thomas K Varghese, Robert Habib, Brian Mitzman","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Before lung cancer resection, patients inquire about dyspnea and the potential need for supplemental oxygen. The objective of this study was to identify predictors of discharge with supplemental oxygen for patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database, study investigators conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer from July 2018 to December 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted association of pulmonary function with discharge on supplemental oxygen and identify independent predictors of discharge with supplemental oxygen. Pulmonary function was modeled as the minimum of either predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second or predicted postoperative diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2100 (8.4%) patients who underwent lobectomy were discharged with supplemental oxygen. Those patients with a minimum of either predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second or predicted postoperative diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide ≤60% had a progressively increased risk of discharge with supplemental oxygen than patients with minimum function >60%. The 2 strongest predictors of discharge with supplemental oxygen were increasing body mass index (25-29 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.21-1.57; 30-39 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: aOR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.88-2.45; ≥40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: aOR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.79-4.39; reference, 18.5-24 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and former (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.67-2.52) or current (aOR, 2.61; 95% CI, 2.10-3.26) smoking status (reference, never smoker).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Of those patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer, 8.4% were discharged with supplemental oxygen. The study identified preoperative independent predictors of discharge with supplemental oxygen that may be useful during shared decision-making discussions of treatment options for lung cancer and setting expectations with patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"180-189"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.08.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Before lung cancer resection, patients inquire about dyspnea and the potential need for supplemental oxygen. The objective of this study was to identify predictors of discharge with supplemental oxygen for patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer.

Methods: Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database, study investigators conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer from July 2018 to December 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted association of pulmonary function with discharge on supplemental oxygen and identify independent predictors of discharge with supplemental oxygen. Pulmonary function was modeled as the minimum of either predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second or predicted postoperative diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide.

Results: Overall, 2100 (8.4%) patients who underwent lobectomy were discharged with supplemental oxygen. Those patients with a minimum of either predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second or predicted postoperative diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide ≤60% had a progressively increased risk of discharge with supplemental oxygen than patients with minimum function >60%. The 2 strongest predictors of discharge with supplemental oxygen were increasing body mass index (25-29 kg/m2: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.21-1.57; 30-39 kg/m2: aOR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.88-2.45; ≥40 kg/m2: aOR, 3.51; 95% CI, 2.79-4.39; reference, 18.5-24 kg/m2) and former (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.67-2.52) or current (aOR, 2.61; 95% CI, 2.10-3.26) smoking status (reference, never smoker).

Conclusions: Of those patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer, 8.4% were discharged with supplemental oxygen. The study identified preoperative independent predictors of discharge with supplemental oxygen that may be useful during shared decision-making discussions of treatment options for lung cancer and setting expectations with patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺癌肺叶切除术后辅助供氧出院的预测因素
背景:肺癌切除术前,患者会询问有关呼吸困难和可能需要补充氧气的问题。我们的目的是确定肺癌肺叶切除术患者出院时补充氧气的预测因素:利用胸外科医师协会普通胸外科数据库,我们对 2018 年 7 月至 2021 年 12 月期间接受肺叶切除术的肺癌患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定肺功能与补充氧气出院的调整关联,并确定补充氧气出院的独立预测因素。肺功能以 ppoFEV1 或 ppoDLCO 的最小值建模:共有 2100 名(8.4%)接受肺叶切除术的患者在出院时使用了辅助供氧。ppoFEV1或ppoDLCO最低值≤60%的患者与最低功能>60%的患者相比,补充氧气出院的风险逐渐增加。补充氧气出院的两个最强预测因素是体重指数增加(25-29 aOR 1.38,95%CI 1.21-1.57;30-39 aOR 2.14,95%CI 1.88-2.45;≥40 aOR 3.51,95%CI 2.79-4.39,参考值 18.5-24)以及曾经(aOR 2.04,95%CI 1.67-2.52)和目前(aOR 2.61,95%CI 2.10-3.26)吸烟状态(参考值从不吸烟):结论:在接受肺叶切除术的肺癌患者中,有 8.4% 的人出院时需要补充氧气。我们发现了术前辅助吸氧出院的独立预测因素,这些因素可能有助于就肺癌治疗方案进行共同决策讨论,并与患者共同设定期望值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Omitting Lymph Node Dissection for Small Ground-Glass Opacity-Dominant Tumors. Multimodal Treatment of Resectable Esophageal Cancer. Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Patients With Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Analysis of 100 Consecutive Neonates. Impact of Liposomal Bupivacaine on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Lung Resection. Lifetime Management of Adolescents and Young Adults with Congenital Aortic Valve Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1