Nurse-led dysphagia screening in the intensive care unit – An implementation study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2024.07.081
Anne Højager Nielsen CCRN, MCN, PhD , Robert Winding MD , Bettina Hvas Busk , Lillian Noe , Birthe Husted CCRN, MHH , Gitte Juhl Kristensen CCRN , Helle Svenningsen CCRN, MCN, PhD , Therese Ovesen MD, DMSc
{"title":"Nurse-led dysphagia screening in the intensive care unit – An implementation study","authors":"Anne Højager Nielsen CCRN, MCN, PhD ,&nbsp;Robert Winding MD ,&nbsp;Bettina Hvas Busk ,&nbsp;Lillian Noe ,&nbsp;Birthe Husted CCRN, MHH ,&nbsp;Gitte Juhl Kristensen CCRN ,&nbsp;Helle Svenningsen CCRN, MCN, PhD ,&nbsp;Therese Ovesen MD, DMSc","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.07.081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postextubation is common in the intensive care unit, and bedside screening by nurses is important to detect the condition and avoid aspiration to the airways.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objective of this study was to assess the implementation of nurse-led, systematic dysphagia screening in the intensive care unit and to identify barriers and facilitators for dysphagia screening.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Design: pragmatic implementation study. Based on a programme theory, key behaviours were identified using the Behaviour Change Wheel framework. Implementation activities included education, e-learning, bedside peer support, feedback, and cues in the environment. Data sources included chart reviews, participant logs, implementation log and focus-group interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participant logs showed 94% of nurses participated in educational sessions, less in e-learning (67%). Chart reviews showed very little use of nurse-led dysphagia screening. Only 19% of extubated patients followed screening protocol. Focus groups showed that nurses accepted the Yale Swallow Protocol as valid that new skills and understandings led to empowerment of nurses and aided decision making. Important barriers were keeping patients nil-per-mouth for intubation, lack of social support from other professionals, and difficulties with documentation. Facilitators were social support from colleagues.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Implementation of nurse-led screening in intensive care was possible but challenged by external factors. Attention should be given to alterations of the screening protocol to avoid alteration of the instrument and easy documentation. Implementation of nurse-led dysphagia screening in intensive care may facilitate safe oral intake in patients and identify patients in need of specialised assessment. Implementation should aim to provide nurses with competences in screening patients swallowing function and allow contextualisation without altering the properties of the instrument.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 1","pages":"Article 101100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731424002108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postextubation is common in the intensive care unit, and bedside screening by nurses is important to detect the condition and avoid aspiration to the airways.

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess the implementation of nurse-led, systematic dysphagia screening in the intensive care unit and to identify barriers and facilitators for dysphagia screening.

Methods

Design: pragmatic implementation study. Based on a programme theory, key behaviours were identified using the Behaviour Change Wheel framework. Implementation activities included education, e-learning, bedside peer support, feedback, and cues in the environment. Data sources included chart reviews, participant logs, implementation log and focus-group interviews.

Results

Participant logs showed 94% of nurses participated in educational sessions, less in e-learning (67%). Chart reviews showed very little use of nurse-led dysphagia screening. Only 19% of extubated patients followed screening protocol. Focus groups showed that nurses accepted the Yale Swallow Protocol as valid that new skills and understandings led to empowerment of nurses and aided decision making. Important barriers were keeping patients nil-per-mouth for intubation, lack of social support from other professionals, and difficulties with documentation. Facilitators were social support from colleagues.

Conclusion

Implementation of nurse-led screening in intensive care was possible but challenged by external factors. Attention should be given to alterations of the screening protocol to avoid alteration of the instrument and easy documentation. Implementation of nurse-led dysphagia screening in intensive care may facilitate safe oral intake in patients and identify patients in need of specialised assessment. Implementation should aim to provide nurses with competences in screening patients swallowing function and allow contextualisation without altering the properties of the instrument.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护病房护士主导的吞咽困难筛查--一项实施研究。
背景:拔管后是重症监护病房的常见病,护士进行床旁筛查对于发现这种情况并避免吸入气道非常重要:本研究旨在评估在重症监护病房实施由护士主导的系统性吞咽困难筛查的情况,并确定吞咽困难筛查的障碍和促进因素:设计:实用实施研究。基于计划理论,使用行为改变轮框架确定关键行为。实施活动包括教育、电子学习、床旁同伴支持、反馈和环境提示。数据来源包括病历审查、参与者日志、实施日志和焦点小组访谈:结果:参与者日志显示,94% 的护士参加了教育课程,参加电子学习的护士较少(67%)。病历审查显示,很少使用护士主导的吞咽困难筛查。只有 19% 的拔管患者遵循了筛查方案。焦点小组讨论显示,护士们认为耶鲁吞咽协议是有效的,新技能和新理解增强了护士的能力,有助于决策制定。重要的障碍是让患者保持无吞咽状态以便插管、缺乏来自其他专业人员的社会支持以及记录困难。同事的社会支持则是促进因素:结论:在重症监护中实施护士主导的筛查是可行的,但受到外部因素的挑战。应注意筛查方案的更改,以避免工具的更改和记录的不便。在重症监护中实施以护士为主导的吞咽困难筛查可促进患者的口腔摄入安全,并识别出需要专业评估的患者。实施的目的应是让护士具备筛查患者吞咽功能的能力,并允许在不改变工具特性的情况下根据具体情况进行筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Wellbeing as perceived and experienced by intensive care unit nurses: An interpretive qualitative analysis Employer-provided wellbeing support for nurses working in intensive care units: A national cross-sectional study Understanding crisis needs among family caregivers of patients in critical care: A qualitative analysis Antidepressant use, but not polypharmacy, is associated with worse outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest in older people “Because I couldn't understand and respond”: A mixed-method study examining the impact of language barriers on patient experiences of intensive care unit outreach team care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1