Evaluation of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor treatment in individuals with cystic fibrosis and CFTRN1303K in the USA: a prospective, multicentre, open-label, single-arm trial.

Abstract

Background: CFTR modulators are approved for approximately 90% of people with cystic fibrosis in the USA and provide substantial clinical benefit. N1303K (Asn1303Lys), one of the most common class 2 CFTR defects, has not been approved for these therapies by any regulatory agency. Preclinical investigation by our laboratories showed N1303K CFTR activation with elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI). In this trial, we evaluate whether ETI improves CFTR function, measured by sweat chloride and other clinical outcomes, in people with cystic fibrosis and CFTR^N1303K.

Methods: In this prospective, open-label, single-arm trial, participants aged 12 years or older with cystic fibrosis encoding at least one N1303K variant and at least one CFTR^N1303K allele who were ineligible for modulator therapy by US Food and Drug Administration labelling were given ETI for 28 days followed by a 28-day washout period at two cystic fibrosis centres in the USA. Participants received two orally administered pills of 100 mg elexacaftor, 50 mg tezacaftor, and 75 mg ivacaftor once daily in the morning, and 150 mg ivacaftor once daily in the evening. The primary endpoint was mean change in sweat chloride from baseline up to day 28 compared with mixed-effects models. Secondary endpoints were changes in percentage of predicted FEV₁ (ppFEV₁), Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) respiratory domain, BMI, and weight after ETI therapy. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug and primary and secondary analyses were performed in all participants who took the study drug per protocol. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03506061) and remains open for reporting purposes.

Findings: Between June 7, 2022, and Oct 20, 2023, 20 participants (ten male and ten female) were enrolled and received ETI treatment. One participant was lost to follow-up but was included in intention-to-treat analyses. At 28 days, the mean sweat chloride reduction was -1·1 mmol/L (95% CI -5·3 to 3·1; p=0·61) with only one participant showing a sweat chloride decrease greater than 15 mmol/L. There was a mean increase in ppFEV₁ from baseline at day 28 of 9·5 percentage points (6·7-12·3; p<0·0001) with 15 (75%) participants showing at least a 5% increase in ppFEV₁. Improvements were also identified in mean CFQ-R respiratory domain score (20·8 increase [95% CI 11·9-29·8]; p<0·0001), BMI (0·4 kg/m² increase [0·2-0·7]; p=0·0017), and weight (1·0 kg increase [0·4-1·7]; p=0·0020) after 28 days of ETI treatment. 14 (70%) of 20 participants had adverse events (12 [60%] mild, one [5%] moderate), with one (5%) serious adverse event of hospitalisation attributed to pneumonia. No deaths were recorded in the study.

Interpretation: Individuals with CFTR^N1303K showed no change in sweat chloride after 28 days of treatment with ETI. However, there were improvements in secondary clinical endpoints, which suggest clinical efficacy. Our approach provides support for the use of in vitro model systems to inform clinical trials for rare CFTR variants.

Funding: The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and the US National Institutes of Health.