Association between internet use and self-rated health of patients living with diabetes in the community.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241260369
Yuta Mori, Tomoki Tachi, Hatsue Hamano, Keisuke Kimura, Kazutaka Matsumoto, Hiroaki Sakurai
{"title":"Association between internet use and self-rated health of patients living with diabetes in the community.","authors":"Yuta Mori, Tomoki Tachi, Hatsue Hamano, Keisuke Kimura, Kazutaka Matsumoto, Hiroaki Sakurai","doi":"10.1177/20552076241260369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is not clear whether self-rated health is associated with internet use among community-dwelling patients living with diabetes. This study investigated what kind and level of use of the internet is desirable for the subjective sense of health among patients living with diabetes in the community.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of patients living with diabetes aged 18 years or older who visited our clinic between April 2022 and June 2022. The final analysis included 654 subjects (mean age: 56-90 years). The objective variable was self-rated health, and the explanatory variable was purpose of internet use. We used logistic regression analysis to identify odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between internet use and self-rated health by purpose of internet use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 654 patients living with diabetes using our clinic, 488 (64.7%) were internet users. Communication with friends/family (66.6%) was the most common use of the internet, followed by social media (54.3%) and shopping (36.7%). Logistic regression models showed that social media (OR: 1.81; 95% CI [1.02, 3.21], <i>p</i> = 0.04), shopping for food and other items (OR: 1.95; 95% CI [1.00, 3.77], <i>p</i> = 0.04), online securities and banking (OR: 2.75; 95% CI [1.02, 7.39], <i>p</i> = 0.04) were associated with self-rated health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using the internet for social media, shopping, and banking were found to be associated with self-rated health. Use for these purposes could help support diabetic care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241260369","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: It is not clear whether self-rated health is associated with internet use among community-dwelling patients living with diabetes. This study investigated what kind and level of use of the internet is desirable for the subjective sense of health among patients living with diabetes in the community.

Research design and methods: This was a cross-sectional study of patients living with diabetes aged 18 years or older who visited our clinic between April 2022 and June 2022. The final analysis included 654 subjects (mean age: 56-90 years). The objective variable was self-rated health, and the explanatory variable was purpose of internet use. We used logistic regression analysis to identify odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between internet use and self-rated health by purpose of internet use.

Results: Of the 654 patients living with diabetes using our clinic, 488 (64.7%) were internet users. Communication with friends/family (66.6%) was the most common use of the internet, followed by social media (54.3%) and shopping (36.7%). Logistic regression models showed that social media (OR: 1.81; 95% CI [1.02, 3.21], p = 0.04), shopping for food and other items (OR: 1.95; 95% CI [1.00, 3.77], p = 0.04), online securities and banking (OR: 2.75; 95% CI [1.02, 7.39], p = 0.04) were associated with self-rated health.

Conclusions: Using the internet for social media, shopping, and banking were found to be associated with self-rated health. Use for these purposes could help support diabetic care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区糖尿病患者使用互联网与自我健康评价之间的关系。
目的:目前尚不清楚在社区居住的糖尿病患者中,自我健康评价是否与互联网的使用有关。本研究调查了社区糖尿病患者使用互联网的类型和程度对其主观健康感的影响:这是一项横断面研究,研究对象为 2022 年 4 月至 2022 年 6 月期间就诊的 18 岁或以上糖尿病患者。最终分析包括 654 名受试者(平均年龄:56-90 岁)。目标变量是自我健康评价,解释变量是使用互联网的目的。我们使用逻辑回归分析确定了互联网使用与自评健康之间的几率比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs),并按互联网使用目的进行了分类:在本诊所就诊的 654 名糖尿病患者中,有 488 人(64.7%)使用互联网。与朋友/家人交流(66.6%)是最常见的互联网用途,其次是社交媒体(54.3%)和购物(36.7%)。逻辑回归模型显示,社交媒体(OR:1.81;95% CI [1.02,3.21],P = 0.04)、食品和其他物品购物(OR:1.95;95% CI [1.00,3.77],P = 0.04)、网上证券和银行业务(OR:2.75;95% CI [1.02,7.39],P = 0.04)与自评健康相关:结论:使用互联网进行社交媒体、购物和银行业务与自我健康评价有关。结论:使用互联网进行社交媒体、购物和银行业务与自评健康状况有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
期刊最新文献
A feasibility study on utilizing machine learning technology to reduce the costs of gastric cancer screening in Taizhou, China. Ageing well with tech: Exploring the determinants of e-healthcare services adoption in an emerging economy. Chinese colposcopists' attitudes toward the colposcopic artificial intelligence auxiliary diagnostic system (CAIADS): A nation-wide, multi-center survey. Digital leadership: Norwegian healthcare managers' attitudes towards using digital tools. Disease characteristics influence the privacy calculus to adopt electronic health records: A survey study in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1