On the motivation for pharmaceutical manufacturer coupons: Brand loyalty or customer acquisition?

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14379
Jason Brian Gibbons, Manuel Hermosilla, Antonio Trujillo
{"title":"On the motivation for pharmaceutical manufacturer coupons: Brand loyalty or customer acquisition?","authors":"Jason Brian Gibbons, Manuel Hermosilla, Antonio Trujillo","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To generate evidence regarding the offensive (customer acquisition) versus defensive (customer retention) motivation for pharmaceutical manufacturer coupons.</p><p><strong>Data sources and study setting: </strong>Retail prescriptions from IQVIA's Formulary Impact Analyzer data between 2017 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Ordinary least squares regression models with person, therapeutic class, drug, and time-fixed effects to measure the association between switching medications and coupon usage as well as the association between patient out-of-pocket spending and switching to a drug and using a coupon. To study switching type heterogeneity, reanalysis of associations for any type of switch, generic-brand switches, and brand-brand switches. Reestimation of baseline analyses for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, anticoagulants, and inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting beta2-agonists to assess heterogeneity by drug class and market maturity.</p><p><strong>Data collection: </strong>1,167,132 privately insured patients that utilized at least one coupon between 2017 and 2019 for one or more prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Coupon usage was associated with a 1.0 percentage point reduction in any kind of drug switch in the full sample and by 0.65-2.9 percentage points for the drug class subgroups. However, these estimates are governed by market dynamics; the probability of switching increased by 40% on the first coupon usage before declining by more than 50% on subsequent coupons. Switching after the first coupon use may be explained by systematic savings implied by coupon use; we find coupons reduced patient out-of-pocket spending by $45.00 (i.e., the majority of patient out-of-pocket costs). In subgroup analyses, coupon savings were $6.43 larger than average for anticoagulants, characterized by the highest levels of brand and generic competition among the considered therapeutic classes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pharmaceutical manufacturers may be using coupons to acquire customers and then build brand loyalty, especially in markets with more generic competition. Antitrust authorities and other regulators should scrutinize the impact of coupons on market competitiveness and drug spending.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14379","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To generate evidence regarding the offensive (customer acquisition) versus defensive (customer retention) motivation for pharmaceutical manufacturer coupons.

Data sources and study setting: Retail prescriptions from IQVIA's Formulary Impact Analyzer data between 2017 and 2019.

Study design: Ordinary least squares regression models with person, therapeutic class, drug, and time-fixed effects to measure the association between switching medications and coupon usage as well as the association between patient out-of-pocket spending and switching to a drug and using a coupon. To study switching type heterogeneity, reanalysis of associations for any type of switch, generic-brand switches, and brand-brand switches. Reestimation of baseline analyses for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, anticoagulants, and inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting beta2-agonists to assess heterogeneity by drug class and market maturity.

Data collection: 1,167,132 privately insured patients that utilized at least one coupon between 2017 and 2019 for one or more prescriptions.

Principal findings: Coupon usage was associated with a 1.0 percentage point reduction in any kind of drug switch in the full sample and by 0.65-2.9 percentage points for the drug class subgroups. However, these estimates are governed by market dynamics; the probability of switching increased by 40% on the first coupon usage before declining by more than 50% on subsequent coupons. Switching after the first coupon use may be explained by systematic savings implied by coupon use; we find coupons reduced patient out-of-pocket spending by $45.00 (i.e., the majority of patient out-of-pocket costs). In subgroup analyses, coupon savings were $6.43 larger than average for anticoagulants, characterized by the highest levels of brand and generic competition among the considered therapeutic classes.

Conclusions: Pharmaceutical manufacturers may be using coupons to acquire customers and then build brand loyalty, especially in markets with more generic competition. Antitrust authorities and other regulators should scrutinize the impact of coupons on market competitiveness and drug spending.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制药商使用优惠券的动机:品牌忠诚度还是客户获取?
目的:就制药商优惠券的进攻性(获取顾客)和防御性(留住顾客)动机提供证据:就制药商优惠券的进攻性(获取客户)与防御性(留住客户)动机提供证据.数据来源与研究环境:研究设计:普通最小二乘法回归模型,包含个人、治疗类别、药物和时间固定效应,用于测量换药与优惠券使用之间的关联,以及患者自付支出与换药和使用优惠券之间的关联。为了研究换药类型的异质性,重新分析了任何类型的换药、非专利品牌换药和品牌换药之间的关联。重新估计钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2 抑制剂、抗凝剂和吸入式皮质类固醇/长效 β2-受体激动剂的基线分析,以评估药物类别和市场成熟度的异质性:1,167,132名私人投保患者在2017年至2019年期间使用了至少一张优惠券来购买一种或多种处方:在全部样本中,优惠券的使用与任何类型的药物转换减少 1.0 个百分点相关,而在药物类别分组中,优惠券的使用与任何类型的药物转换减少 0.65-2.9 个百分点相关。然而,这些估计值受市场动态的影响;首次使用优惠券的换药概率增加了 40%,随后使用优惠券的换药概率下降了 50%以上。首次使用优惠券后的转换可能是由于使用优惠券带来的系统性节省;我们发现优惠券使患者的自付费用减少了 45.00 美元(即患者自付费用的大部分)。在分组分析中,抗凝药的优惠券节省额比平均水平高出 6.43 美元,而抗凝药的品牌和非专利药的竞争程度在所考虑的治疗类别中是最高的:结论:制药商可能会利用优惠券来获取客户,然后建立品牌忠诚度,尤其是在非专利药竞争较为激烈的市场。反垄断机构和其他监管机构应仔细研究优惠券对市场竞争力和药品支出的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Instrumental variables in the cost of illness featuring type 2 diabetes. Evaluating a predictive model of avoidable hospital events for race- and sex-based bias. Addressing social and health needs in health care: Characterizing case managers' work to address patient-defined goals. Changes in healthcare costs and utilization for Medicaid recipients who received supportive housing through a payer-community-based housing partnership. Exploring the health impacts of climate change: Challenges and considerations for health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1