Barriers and enablers to bowel cancer screening participation in remote Tasmania: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Australian Journal of Rural Health Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1111/ajr.13181
Nicola Gadd, Simone Lee, Jessica Hughes, Matthew J Sharman, Ha Hoang, Kehinde Obamiro
{"title":"Barriers and enablers to bowel cancer screening participation in remote Tasmania: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.","authors":"Nicola Gadd, Simone Lee, Jessica Hughes, Matthew J Sharman, Ha Hoang, Kehinde Obamiro","doi":"10.1111/ajr.13181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify barriers and enablers for remote Tasmanians participating in bowel cancer screening through the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A small remote Tasmanian community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Tasmanian remote community members aged 50 years and over.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study conducted 16 semi-structured interviews. Two researchers conducted in-person and telephone interviews. Questions were directed by an interview guide developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework for behaviour change and Behaviour Change Wheel. Two researchers analysed data using directed content analysis with a flexible inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes related to barriers and enablers to completing the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program screening kit in remote Tasmania. Themes included the subject of screening, physical screening kit, the process and outcome of the kit. Several barrier and enabler sub-themes overlapped or were linked, as many enablers mitigated barriers. For example, social influences, awareness level, steps in completing screening, and planning and timing to screen. Social support and discussing screening with others were key enablers, whereas lack of these were barriers. For remote communities, taking the kit to the post office was a barrier from often knowing the post officer. A bowel bus providing screening and information support services may reduce the travel burden of follow-up diagnostic tests and support low-literacy individuals to screen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barriers and enablers exist within each stage of the screening process, from what influences an individual decision to screen, through to the outcome. To improve screening rates in rural/remote Tasmania, barriers and enablers to screening must be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.13181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Identify barriers and enablers for remote Tasmanians participating in bowel cancer screening through the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.

Setting: A small remote Tasmanian community.

Participants: Tasmanian remote community members aged 50 years and over.

Design: A qualitative study conducted 16 semi-structured interviews. Two researchers conducted in-person and telephone interviews. Questions were directed by an interview guide developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework for behaviour change and Behaviour Change Wheel. Two researchers analysed data using directed content analysis with a flexible inductive approach.

Results: Four themes related to barriers and enablers to completing the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program screening kit in remote Tasmania. Themes included the subject of screening, physical screening kit, the process and outcome of the kit. Several barrier and enabler sub-themes overlapped or were linked, as many enablers mitigated barriers. For example, social influences, awareness level, steps in completing screening, and planning and timing to screen. Social support and discussing screening with others were key enablers, whereas lack of these were barriers. For remote communities, taking the kit to the post office was a barrier from often knowing the post officer. A bowel bus providing screening and information support services may reduce the travel burden of follow-up diagnostic tests and support low-literacy individuals to screen.

Conclusion: Barriers and enablers exist within each stage of the screening process, from what influences an individual decision to screen, through to the outcome. To improve screening rates in rural/remote Tasmania, barriers and enablers to screening must be considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塔斯马尼亚偏远地区参与肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:采用理论领域框架的定性研究。
目标:确定偏远地区塔斯马尼亚人参与国家肠癌筛查计划的障碍和促进因素:确定偏远塔斯马尼亚人通过国家肠癌筛查计划参与肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:塔斯马尼亚州的一个偏远小社区:塔斯马尼亚州 50 岁及以上的偏远社区成员:设计:一项定性研究,进行了 16 次半结构化访谈。两名研究人员分别进行了面谈和电话访谈。问题由使用行为改变理论领域框架和行为改变轮制定的访谈指南指导。两名研究人员采用灵活的归纳法对数据进行了定向内容分析:四个主题涉及在塔斯马尼亚偏远地区完成国家肠癌筛查计划筛查工具包的障碍和促进因素。主题包括筛查主题、实物筛查工具包、过程和结果。有几个障碍和促进因素子主题重叠或相关联,因为许多促进因素减轻了障碍。例如,社会影响、认识水平、完成筛查的步骤以及筛查的计划和时间。社会支持和与他人讨论筛查是关键的促进因素,而缺乏这些因素则是障碍。对于偏远社区来说,将工具包带到邮局是一个障碍,因为他们往往不认识邮局的工作人员。提供筛查和信息支持服务的肠道巴士可减轻后续诊断检测的交通负担,并支持识字率低的人进行筛查:从影响个人筛查决定的因素到筛查结果,筛查过程的每个阶段都存在障碍和促进因素。为了提高塔斯马尼亚州农村/偏远地区的筛查率,必须考虑筛查的障碍和促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Australian Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Barriers and enablers to bowel cancer screening participation in remote Tasmania: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. Exploring learning characteristics and progression of GP trainees based in regional, rural and remote settings: A qualitative study. The term 'Comprehensive Cancer Centre' is outdated in contemporary Australian health systems. Issue Information International declaration on rural mental health research: 10 guiding principles and standards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1