Motivation toward vasectomy based on abortion law changes in Oklahoma.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Canadian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-08-01
Hope Ogbeide, Ehidiamen Oamen, Travis H Wilmore, Jennifer D Peck, Johnathan P Doolittle, Nathan A Bradley, Jonathan E Heinlen
{"title":"Motivation toward vasectomy based on abortion law changes in Oklahoma.","authors":"Hope Ogbeide, Ehidiamen Oamen, Travis H Wilmore, Jennifer D Peck, Johnathan P Doolittle, Nathan A Bradley, Jonathan E Heinlen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In May 2022, lawmakers in Oklahoma passed House Bill 4327, which outlawed abortion after fertilization. The governor signed the bill on May 25, 2022. It is uncertain whether these changes will motivate more men in Oklahoma to undergo vasectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Males seeking vasectomy were informed of the study and asked to participate. Participants filled out a survey regarding their marital status, number of children, fertility treatment history, and their influences in making the decision to pursue vasectomy. We removed the identifying information from the survey. After collection, the data was imported to a database. Medical records were investigated to confirm patients underwent the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 126 participants, 116 underwent vasectomy. Patients who did not undergo vasectomy tended to be older (38.4 vs. 34.2, p = 0.03). Participants who underwent vasectomy and were concerned about abortion laws tended to be married (69.7 vs. 30.3%, p = 0.04) with fewer children (1.2 vs. 2.3, p < 0.0001). When correlating specifically \"concern about abortion laws\" and going through with vasectomy, the risk ratio of 1.12 (95% CI 1.04, 1.20) indicates that patients concerned about abortion laws were slightly more likely to undergo vasectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over 26% of men said that their decisions were somewhat impacted by abortion law changes. The concern about abortion law changes seemed to be predictive of patients undergoing vasectomy. Continued data collection will help determine whether there is a time-sensitive nature regarding the impact of abortion law changes on motivation to vasectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":56323,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In May 2022, lawmakers in Oklahoma passed House Bill 4327, which outlawed abortion after fertilization. The governor signed the bill on May 25, 2022. It is uncertain whether these changes will motivate more men in Oklahoma to undergo vasectomy.

Materials and methods: Males seeking vasectomy were informed of the study and asked to participate. Participants filled out a survey regarding their marital status, number of children, fertility treatment history, and their influences in making the decision to pursue vasectomy. We removed the identifying information from the survey. After collection, the data was imported to a database. Medical records were investigated to confirm patients underwent the procedure.

Results: Of the 126 participants, 116 underwent vasectomy. Patients who did not undergo vasectomy tended to be older (38.4 vs. 34.2, p = 0.03). Participants who underwent vasectomy and were concerned about abortion laws tended to be married (69.7 vs. 30.3%, p = 0.04) with fewer children (1.2 vs. 2.3, p < 0.0001). When correlating specifically "concern about abortion laws" and going through with vasectomy, the risk ratio of 1.12 (95% CI 1.04, 1.20) indicates that patients concerned about abortion laws were slightly more likely to undergo vasectomy.

Conclusions: Over 26% of men said that their decisions were somewhat impacted by abortion law changes. The concern about abortion law changes seemed to be predictive of patients undergoing vasectomy. Continued data collection will help determine whether there is a time-sensitive nature regarding the impact of abortion law changes on motivation to vasectomy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于俄克拉荷马州堕胎法修改的输精管切除动机。
导言:2022 年 5 月,俄克拉荷马州的立法者通过了第 4327 号众议院法案,规定受精后堕胎为非法。州长于 2022 年 5 月 25 日签署了该法案。目前还不确定这些变化是否会促使俄克拉荷马州的更多男性接受输精管结扎手术:寻求输精管切除术的男性被告知这项研究并被要求参与。参与者填写了一份调查问卷,内容涉及他们的婚姻状况、子女数量、生育治疗史以及他们做出结扎手术决定的影响因素。我们删除了调查表中的身份识别信息。收集完成后,我们将数据导入数据库。我们对医疗记录进行了调查,以确认患者是否接受了手术:在 126 名参与者中,116 人接受了输精管结扎术。未接受输精管结扎手术的患者年龄较大(38.4 岁对 34.2 岁,P = 0.03)。接受输精管结扎手术并关注堕胎法的参与者往往已婚(69.7% 对 30.3%,p = 0.04),子女较少(1.2 对 2.3,p < 0.0001)。如果将 "对堕胎法的关注 "与输精管结扎手术的实施具体相关联,1.12(95% CI 1.04,1.20)的风险比表明,关注堕胎法的患者接受输精管结扎手术的可能性略高:超过 26% 的男性表示,堕胎法的修改对他们的决定有一定影响。对堕胎法修改的担忧似乎可以预测患者接受输精管切除术的可能性。继续收集数据将有助于确定堕胎法的变化对输精管结扎手术动机的影响是否具有时效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Urology
Canadian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The CJU publishes articles of interest to the field of urology and related specialties who treat urologic diseases.
期刊最新文献
A costing and health-related quality of life study of high intensity focused ultrasound in primary treatment of localized low or intermediate risk prostate cancer in Ontario. Is there a relationship between testosterone and androgen receptor with prostatectomy outcomes? Legends in Urology v31I04. Motivation toward vasectomy based on abortion law changes in Oklahoma. MRI-based PI-RADS score predicts ISUP upgrading and adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in men with biopsy ISUP 1 prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1