Outcomes of sacral neuromodulation in male patients with overactive bladder, chronic pelvic pain, and fecal incontinence.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Canadian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-08-01
Roseanne Ferreira, Emad Alwashmi, Samuel Otis-Chapados, Naeem Bhojani, Kevin C Zorn, Bilal Chughtai, Dean S Elterman
{"title":"Outcomes of sacral neuromodulation in male patients with overactive bladder, chronic pelvic pain, and fecal incontinence.","authors":"Roseanne Ferreira, Emad Alwashmi, Samuel Otis-Chapados, Naeem Bhojani, Kevin C Zorn, Bilal Chughtai, Dean S Elterman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the growing body of literature on sacral neuromodulation (SNM) outcomes, research focusing on male patients remains limited and often represented by small cohorts nested within a larger study of mostly women. Herein, we evaluated the outcomes of SNM in a male-only cohort with overactive bladder (OAB), fecal incontinence (FI), chronic bladder pain, and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 64 male patients who underwent SNM insertion between 2013 and 2021 at a high-volume tertiary center. Indications for SNM therapy included OAB, FI, chronic pelvic pain, and NLUTD. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's and t-test were used in analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 57.7 ± 13.4 years, and the most frequent reason for SNM insertion was idiopathic OAB (72%), FI (16%), pelvic pain (11%), and NLUTD (11%). A majority (84%) of men received treatment prior to SNM insertion. 84% reported satisfaction and 92% symptom improvement within the first year, and these improvements persisted beyond 1 year in 73% of patients. Mean follow up was 52.7 ± 21.0 months. The complication rate was 23%, and the need for adjunct treatments was significantly reduced (73% to 27%, p < 0.001). Treatment outcomes did not differ significantly between various indications for SNM therapy or the presence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SNM is an effective and safe procedure for male patients with neurogenic and non-neurogenic OAB, pelvic pain, and FI. Over 70% of patients experienced symptomatic improvement and remained satisfied in the mid to long term follow up. BPH does not seem to hinder treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56323,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Urology","volume":"31 4","pages":"11943-11949"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the growing body of literature on sacral neuromodulation (SNM) outcomes, research focusing on male patients remains limited and often represented by small cohorts nested within a larger study of mostly women. Herein, we evaluated the outcomes of SNM in a male-only cohort with overactive bladder (OAB), fecal incontinence (FI), chronic bladder pain, and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD).

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included 64 male patients who underwent SNM insertion between 2013 and 2021 at a high-volume tertiary center. Indications for SNM therapy included OAB, FI, chronic pelvic pain, and NLUTD. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's and t-test were used in analysis.

Results: The mean age was 57.7 ± 13.4 years, and the most frequent reason for SNM insertion was idiopathic OAB (72%), FI (16%), pelvic pain (11%), and NLUTD (11%). A majority (84%) of men received treatment prior to SNM insertion. 84% reported satisfaction and 92% symptom improvement within the first year, and these improvements persisted beyond 1 year in 73% of patients. Mean follow up was 52.7 ± 21.0 months. The complication rate was 23%, and the need for adjunct treatments was significantly reduced (73% to 27%, p < 0.001). Treatment outcomes did not differ significantly between various indications for SNM therapy or the presence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Conclusion: SNM is an effective and safe procedure for male patients with neurogenic and non-neurogenic OAB, pelvic pain, and FI. Over 70% of patients experienced symptomatic improvement and remained satisfied in the mid to long term follow up. BPH does not seem to hinder treatment outcomes.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膀胱过度活动症、慢性骨盆疼痛和大便失禁男性患者的骶神经调节疗效。
简介:尽管有关骶神经调控(SNM)疗效的文献越来越多,但针对男性患者的研究仍然有限,而且往往是嵌套在以女性为主的大型研究中的小型队列。在此,我们评估了膀胱过度活动症(OAB)、大便失禁(FI)、慢性膀胱痛和神经源性下尿路功能障碍(NLUTD)男性队列的骶神经调节治疗效果:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 2013 年至 2021 年期间在一家大容量三级医疗中心接受 SNM 植入术的 64 名男性患者。SNM治疗的适应症包括OAB、FI、慢性盆腔疼痛和NLUTD。分析中使用了描述性统计、费雪检验和 t 检验:平均年龄为 57.7 ± 13.4 岁,插入 SNM 的最常见原因是特发性 OAB(72%)、FI(16%)、盆腔疼痛(11%)和 NLUTD(11%)。大多数男性(84%)在植入 SNM 之前接受了治疗。84%的患者表示满意,92%的患者在第一年内症状有所改善,73%的患者在一年后症状持续改善。平均随访时间为 52.7 ± 21.0 个月。并发症发生率为 23%,对辅助治疗的需求显著降低(从 73% 降至 27%,p < 0.001)。不同的SNM治疗适应症或良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的治疗效果没有明显差异:对于患有神经源性和非神经源性 OAB、盆腔疼痛和 FI 的男性患者来说,SNM 是一种有效而安全的治疗方法。70%以上的患者症状得到改善,并在中长期随访中保持满意。良性前列腺增生似乎并不妨碍治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Urology
Canadian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The CJU publishes articles of interest to the field of urology and related specialties who treat urologic diseases.
期刊最新文献
A Chief Wellness Officer, Every Hospital Should Have One; Marlon Brando Was Right. Artificial intelligence improves urologic oncology patient education and counseling. Factors associated with surgical refusal and non-surgical candidacy in stage 1 kidney cancer: a National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis. How I Do It:  EnPlace sacrospinous ligament fixation. Implications of MRI contrast enhancement following focal prostate cancer cryoablation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1