Predictive and prognostic value of preoperative pan-immune-inflammation value in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

0 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomolecules & biomedicine Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.17305/bb.2024.10658
Peipei Shen, Yu Xu, Jiahao Zhu, Danqi Qian, Bo Yang, Yong Mao, Shengjun Ji, Ke Gu, Yutian Zhao
{"title":"Predictive and prognostic value of preoperative pan-immune-inflammation value in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.","authors":"Peipei Shen, Yu Xu, Jiahao Zhu, Danqi Qian, Bo Yang, Yong Mao, Shengjun Ji, Ke Gu, Yutian Zhao","doi":"10.17305/bb.2024.10658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision. We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinicopathological data of 215 resected LARC patients. X-tile software was used to determine the optimal threshold value for PIV in predicting overall survival (OS). The predictive ability of PIV for pathological complete regression (pCR), OS, and disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated and compared with other inflammation markers. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for pCR and Cox regression analyses for OS and DFS were conducted. The optimal threshold value for PIV was determined to be 454.7 based on the X-tile software. Patients were then categorized into low (≤ 454.7) and high (> 454.7) PIV groups comprising 153 and 62 patients, respectively. PIV demonstrated superior predictive ability for pCR, OS, and DFS compared to other inflammation markers. LARC patients with low PIV had significantly higher pCR (P = 0.029), OS (P = 0.002), and DFS (P = 0.001) rates compared to those with high PIV. Multivariate regression analysis identified PIV as an independent prognostic factor for pCR (odds ratio = 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.80; P = 0.014), OS (hazard ratio = 3.08; 95% CI, 1.77-5.35; P = 0.001), and DFS (hazard ratio = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.58-4.06; P = 0.002). This study confirmed that preoperative PIV could serve as a useful independent prognostic factor in LARC patients treated with nCRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":72398,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"1000-1008"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11984369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2024.10658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision. We retrospectively collected and analyzed the clinicopathological data of 215 resected LARC patients. X-tile software was used to determine the optimal threshold value for PIV in predicting overall survival (OS). The predictive ability of PIV for pathological complete regression (pCR), OS, and disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated and compared with other inflammation markers. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for pCR and Cox regression analyses for OS and DFS were conducted. The optimal threshold value for PIV was determined to be 454.7 based on the X-tile software. Patients were then categorized into low (≤ 454.7) and high (> 454.7) PIV groups comprising 153 and 62 patients, respectively. PIV demonstrated superior predictive ability for pCR, OS, and DFS compared to other inflammation markers. LARC patients with low PIV had significantly higher pCR (P = 0.029), OS (P = 0.002), and DFS (P = 0.001) rates compared to those with high PIV. Multivariate regression analysis identified PIV as an independent prognostic factor for pCR (odds ratio = 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.80; P = 0.014), OS (hazard ratio = 3.08; 95% CI, 1.77-5.35; P = 0.001), and DFS (hazard ratio = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.58-4.06; P = 0.002). This study confirmed that preoperative PIV could serve as a useful independent prognostic factor in LARC patients treated with nCRT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部晚期直肠癌患者术前泛免疫炎症值的预测和预后价值。
本研究旨在探讨泛免疫炎症值(PIV)在接受新辅助化放疗(nCRT)后进行全直肠系膜切除术的局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者中的预后价值。我们回顾性地收集并分析了215例切除的LARC患者的临床病理数据。我们使用X-tile软件确定了PIV预测总生存期(OS)的最佳阈值。评估了PIV对病理完全缓解(pCR)、OS和无病生存(DFS)的预测能力,并与其他炎症标志物进行了比较。对 pCR 进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,对 OS 和 DFS 进行了 Cox 回归分析。根据X-tile软件,PIV的最佳阈值被确定为454.7。然后将患者分为低 PIV 组(≤ 454.7)和高 PIV 组(> 454.7),分别有 153 名和 62 名患者。与其他炎症指标相比,PIV对pCR、OS和DFS的预测能力更强。与高 PIV 患者相比,低 PIV LARC 患者的 pCR(P = 0.029)、OS(P = 0.002)和 DFS(P = 0.001)率明显更高。多变量回归分析发现,PIV 是 pCR(几率比 = 0.32;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.10-0.80;P = 0.014)、OS(危险比 = 3.08;95% CI,1.77-5.35;P = 0.001)和 DFS(危险比 = 2.53;95% CI,1.58-4.06;P = 0.002)的独立预后因素。这项研究证实,术前PIV可作为接受nCRT治疗的LARC患者的一个有用的独立预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STOP algorithm for bedside mechanical ventilation: Standardized, evidence-based management of critically ill patients. Pre-analytical storage effects on ALU- and LINE1-derived cell-free DNA biomarkers in whole blood and plasma. A remarkable year for NSCLC: Seven new FDA approvals in 2025 across molecular targets. Tubular functional capacity and maladaptive parathyroid hormone response in early-stage chronic kidney disease. Association of laryngopharyngeal reflux with chronic rhinosinusitis prevalence in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1