Randomized pilot trial of cell phone support to improve medication adherence among adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions.

BMC digital health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1186/s44247-024-00069-w
Caitlin S Sayegh, Karen K MacDonell, Ellen Iverson, Breaon Beard, Nancy Chang, My H Vu, Marvin Belzer
{"title":"Randomized pilot trial of cell phone support to improve medication adherence among adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions.","authors":"Caitlin S Sayegh, Karen K MacDonell, Ellen Iverson, Breaon Beard, Nancy Chang, My H Vu, Marvin Belzer","doi":"10.1186/s44247-024-00069-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adolescents and young adults (AYA) living with chronic medical conditions often struggle to develop medication adherence skills. This pilot trial evaluated the impact of a mobile health coaching intervention, Cell Phone Support (CPS), on medication adherence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interventions in this randomized trial were CPS delivered by phone calls (CPS-C), CPS delivered by text messages (CPS-T), or automated text message reminders (ATR). Participants were AYA with different chronic medical conditions (i.e., sickle cell disease, solid organ transplant, type 2 diabetes), aged 15-20 years (<i>N</i> = 34). We examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of each intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of both CPS interventions. CPS was feasible and acceptable. There was evidence that participants found CPS to be more useful than ATR. In this pilot trial, participants receiving CPS reported relatively stronger increases in adherence, compared to those assigned to ATR. CPS-C slightly outperformed CPS-T.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing coaching to AYA struggling with illness self-management via their cell phones may promote their acquisition of medication adherence skills. Although larger studies are needed to confirm the results of this pilot study, phone calls and text messages are both promising modalities for delivering human cell phone support.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered prospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04241627) on 1/27/2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":72426,"journal":{"name":"BMC digital health","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-024-00069-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescents and young adults (AYA) living with chronic medical conditions often struggle to develop medication adherence skills. This pilot trial evaluated the impact of a mobile health coaching intervention, Cell Phone Support (CPS), on medication adherence.

Methods: Interventions in this randomized trial were CPS delivered by phone calls (CPS-C), CPS delivered by text messages (CPS-T), or automated text message reminders (ATR). Participants were AYA with different chronic medical conditions (i.e., sickle cell disease, solid organ transplant, type 2 diabetes), aged 15-20 years (N = 34). We examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of each intervention.

Results: We examined the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of both CPS interventions. CPS was feasible and acceptable. There was evidence that participants found CPS to be more useful than ATR. In this pilot trial, participants receiving CPS reported relatively stronger increases in adherence, compared to those assigned to ATR. CPS-C slightly outperformed CPS-T.

Conclusions: Providing coaching to AYA struggling with illness self-management via their cell phones may promote their acquisition of medication adherence skills. Although larger studies are needed to confirm the results of this pilot study, phone calls and text messages are both promising modalities for delivering human cell phone support.

Trial registration: This trial was registered prospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04241627) on 1/27/2020.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过手机支持改善患有慢性疾病的青少年服药依从性的随机试点试验。
导言:患有慢性疾病的青少年和年轻成人(AYA)往往很难掌握坚持服药的技能。本试验评估了移动健康指导干预--手机支持(CPS)--对坚持服药的影响:这项随机试验的干预措施包括通过电话提供的 CPS(CPS-C)、通过短信提供的 CPS(CPS-T)或自动短信提醒(ATR)。参与者为患有不同慢性疾病(如镰状细胞病、实体器官移植、2 型糖尿病)的青少年,年龄在 15-20 岁之间(34 人)。我们研究了每种干预措施的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效:我们研究了两种 CPS 干预方法的可行性、可接受性和初步疗效。CPS 是可行和可接受的。有证据表明,参与者认为 CPS 比 ATR 更有用。在这项试点试验中,接受 CPS 的受试者与接受 ATR 的受试者相比,在坚持治疗方面有了更大的提高。CPS-C的效果略优于CPS-T:结论:通过手机为在疾病自我管理中挣扎的青少年提供指导,可促进他们掌握坚持服药的技能。尽管需要更大规模的研究来证实这项试点研究的结果,但电话和短信都是很有前景的手机支持方式:本试验于2020年1月27日在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04241627)进行了前瞻性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential sources of inaccuracy in the Apple watch series 4 energy expenditure estimation algorithm during wheelchair propulsion From an idea to the marketplace: identifying and addressing ethical and regulatory considerations across the digital health product-development lifecycle Efficacy of digital interventions on physical activity promotion in individuals with noncommunicable diseases: an overview of systematic reviews Software symptomcheckR: an R package for analyzing and visualizing symptom checker triage performance Introduction and content analysis of "Nurse's voice" WhatsApp group during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1