Extralaryngeal Spread in Total Laryngectomy: Comparing the Need for Thyroidectomy.

Macie Cain, Anna Celeste Gibson, Soroush Farsi, Deanne King, Kyle Davis, Emre Vural, Jumin Sunde, Mauricio Moreno
{"title":"Extralaryngeal Spread in Total Laryngectomy: Comparing the Need for Thyroidectomy.","authors":"Macie Cain, Anna Celeste Gibson, Soroush Farsi, Deanne King, Kyle Davis, Emre Vural, Jumin Sunde, Mauricio Moreno","doi":"10.1177/01455613241271726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> At our institution, thyroid preservation during total laryngectomy (TL) varies by surgeon, offering a distinctive dataset to compare disease outcomes in TL patients with or without thyroidectomy. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective chart review study, conducted at a tertiary referral medical center, comprises patients who underwent TL for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma from 2014 to 2022. The study includes data on patient demographics, surgeries, pathological staging, tumor subsites, thyroid involvement, and adjuvant therapy. <b>Results:</b> In this study, 147 patients, mostly male (83%) and white (82%), were included. Surgeries comprised 60 hemi thyroidectomies, 35 total or completion thyroidectomies, 48 without thyroid removal, and 4 isthmusectomies. Data analysis compared these 4 groups and the cohort of no thyroid removal (NT) versus any thyroidectomy (T = 99). Among the 99 patients, 27 showed positive gland involvement, primarily due to direct disease extension (26 cases). No significant difference was found in recurrence rates or recurrence-related mortality among the 4 groups or between NT and T (<i>P</i> = .156). However, there was a significant difference in T staging and prognostic staging among the groups and between NT versus T (<i>P</i> = .043). The NT cohort showed a higher likelihood of being T3, while T was more likely to be T4. <b>Conclusion:</b> We found no significant difference in recurrence rates or mortality between TL patients with or without thyroid removal. However, those without thyroid removal often had lower T stages. Notably, 27% of thyroidectomy patients had gland invasion, highlighting the importance of thyroid removal in TL.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613241271726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: At our institution, thyroid preservation during total laryngectomy (TL) varies by surgeon, offering a distinctive dataset to compare disease outcomes in TL patients with or without thyroidectomy. Methods: This retrospective chart review study, conducted at a tertiary referral medical center, comprises patients who underwent TL for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma from 2014 to 2022. The study includes data on patient demographics, surgeries, pathological staging, tumor subsites, thyroid involvement, and adjuvant therapy. Results: In this study, 147 patients, mostly male (83%) and white (82%), were included. Surgeries comprised 60 hemi thyroidectomies, 35 total or completion thyroidectomies, 48 without thyroid removal, and 4 isthmusectomies. Data analysis compared these 4 groups and the cohort of no thyroid removal (NT) versus any thyroidectomy (T = 99). Among the 99 patients, 27 showed positive gland involvement, primarily due to direct disease extension (26 cases). No significant difference was found in recurrence rates or recurrence-related mortality among the 4 groups or between NT and T (P = .156). However, there was a significant difference in T staging and prognostic staging among the groups and between NT versus T (P = .043). The NT cohort showed a higher likelihood of being T3, while T was more likely to be T4. Conclusion: We found no significant difference in recurrence rates or mortality between TL patients with or without thyroid removal. However, those without thyroid removal often had lower T stages. Notably, 27% of thyroidectomy patients had gland invasion, highlighting the importance of thyroid removal in TL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全喉切除术中的喉外扩散:比较甲状腺切除术的必要性。
目的:在我院,全喉切除术(TL)中甲状腺的保留因外科医生而异,这为比较全喉切除术患者进行或不进行甲状腺切除术的疾病预后提供了一个独特的数据集。方法:这项回顾性病历审查研究在一家三级转诊医疗中心进行,研究对象包括2014年至2022年期间因喉或下咽鳞状细胞癌接受TL手术的患者。研究内容包括患者人口统计学、手术、病理分期、肿瘤亚部位、甲状腺受累和辅助治疗等数据。研究结果本研究共纳入 147 名患者,其中大部分为男性(83%)和白人(82%)。手术包括 60 例半甲状腺切除术、35 例全甲状腺切除术或完全甲状腺切除术、48 例未切除甲状腺手术和 4 例峡部切除术。数据分析比较了这4组患者以及未切除甲状腺(NT)与任何甲状腺切除术(T = 99)的组别。在这99例患者中,有27例出现阳性腺体受累,主要是由于疾病直接扩展(26例)。在复发率或复发相关死亡率方面,4组之间或NT与T之间均无明显差异(P = .156)。但是,各组之间以及NT与T之间的T分期和预后分期存在显著差异(P = .043)。NT 组群中 T3 的可能性更大,而 T 组群中 T4 的可能性更大。结论:我们发现,切除或未切除甲状腺的 TL 患者在复发率或死亡率方面没有明显差异。不过,未切除甲状腺的患者通常T分期较低。值得注意的是,27%的甲状腺切除患者有腺体侵犯,这凸显了切除甲状腺对TL的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Pattern of Ear Disease Among Primary School Students in Samoa: Preliminary Results from ENT Clinic Outreach to Urban, Rural and Remote Settings. Plasma Circulating HPV DNA Surveillance in a Patient With Nasopharyngeal Cancer. Coexistence of Tuberculosis and Malignancy in a Single Cervical Lymph Node: A Case Series. Efficacy Analysis of Endoscopic-Assisted Traditional Surgery and Traditional Surgery for Sinonasal Malignant Melanoma. The Role of Immunosuppression on Postoperative Outcomes in Facial Fracture Repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1