{"title":"National survey on peritonsillar abscess treatment and attitudes toward quinsy tonsillectomy.","authors":"Raviv Allon, Elchanan Zloczower, Maxim Chebotaryov, Sapir Pinhas, Yonatan Lahav, Yael Shapira-Galitz","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2024.2399497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is a common deep neck infection traditionally managed with conservative measures. Quinsy Tonsillectomy (QT) is recognized as a definitive treatment but remains variably utilized. We aimed to investigate PTA management strategies and attitudes toward QT among otolaryngologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to members of the local national Society of Otolaryngology, evaluating treatment strategies based on patient characteristics and clinical scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 108 otolaryngologists responded (response rate: 30.8%). Participants preferred to treat PTA patients as inpatients (89%) and predominantly offered incision and drainage (I&D) as the first (90.7%) and subsequent (98.1%) treatment plan. QT was favored as a primary treatment only in 1.9% of responders. QT adoption increased with multiple I&D failures, reaching 95.3% after four attempts. In patients with recurrent PTA or tonsillitis, 84.2% preferred I&D follows by interval elective tonsillectomy, while 15% considered QT. The most common reason (72.2%) to avoid QT was the perception of a high perioperative risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>I&D was favored for initial PTA treatment. QT is considered after multiple failed I&D attempts, and its use is limited as a primary treatment, mainly due to concerns regarding perioperative risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2399497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is a common deep neck infection traditionally managed with conservative measures. Quinsy Tonsillectomy (QT) is recognized as a definitive treatment but remains variably utilized. We aimed to investigate PTA management strategies and attitudes toward QT among otolaryngologists.
Methods: An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to members of the local national Society of Otolaryngology, evaluating treatment strategies based on patient characteristics and clinical scenario.
Results: A total of 108 otolaryngologists responded (response rate: 30.8%). Participants preferred to treat PTA patients as inpatients (89%) and predominantly offered incision and drainage (I&D) as the first (90.7%) and subsequent (98.1%) treatment plan. QT was favored as a primary treatment only in 1.9% of responders. QT adoption increased with multiple I&D failures, reaching 95.3% after four attempts. In patients with recurrent PTA or tonsillitis, 84.2% preferred I&D follows by interval elective tonsillectomy, while 15% considered QT. The most common reason (72.2%) to avoid QT was the perception of a high perioperative risk.
Conclusion: I&D was favored for initial PTA treatment. QT is considered after multiple failed I&D attempts, and its use is limited as a primary treatment, mainly due to concerns regarding perioperative risk.