Socket Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Polylactide-Polyglycolide Acid Scaffold: Radiologic and Histologic Evaluation.

Mevlude Elif Öztürk, Yaşar Özkan
{"title":"Socket Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Polylactide-Polyglycolide Acid Scaffold: Radiologic and Histologic Evaluation.","authors":"Mevlude Elif Öztürk, Yaşar Özkan","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the healing process of the extraction socket and the dimensional changes that occur after alveolar ridge preservation utilizing a polylactide-co-glycolide scaffold (PLGA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The present study involved the extraction of 28 teeth from 14 patients. The total number of sockets was 28, which were divided into two groups consisting of 14 test sockets and 14 control sockets. The study group (SG) was subjected to socket preservation with a PLGA scaffold while the control group (CG) was left for spontaneous healing. The dimensions were measured before and after operation at 1, 3, and 5 mm below the alveolar crest horizontally and the height of buccolingual bone vertically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the histologic analyses, the PLGA scaffold was resorbed within 4 months. CBCT imaging revealed a decrease in the horizontal crest dimension at three distinct coronoapical levels in SG, measuring 2.05 ± 1.05 mm at -1 mm, 1.51 ± 0.89 mm at -3mm, and 0.92 ± 0.7 mm at-5mm.CG showed readings of 1.22 ± 1 at-1mm, 0.92 ± 0.67at-3mm, and 0.73 ± 0.69 at -5 mm. In comparison to CG, SG showed a significant reduction in horizontal losses at -1 mm. Vertical crest dimensions decreased by 1.64 ± 1.11 mm for the buccal bone height and by 1.56 ± 1.08 mm for lingual bone height in SG; in CG, the buccal and lingual bone height had mean values of 2.08 ± 1.44 mm and 1.73 ± 1.27 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference observed in the vertical losses between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following a period of 4 months, the PLGA scaffold was completely resorbed. Based on CBCT measurements, horizontal resorption was lower than CG at -1 mm coronally.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"39 4","pages":"537-545"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the healing process of the extraction socket and the dimensional changes that occur after alveolar ridge preservation utilizing a polylactide-co-glycolide scaffold (PLGA).

Materials and methods: The present study involved the extraction of 28 teeth from 14 patients. The total number of sockets was 28, which were divided into two groups consisting of 14 test sockets and 14 control sockets. The study group (SG) was subjected to socket preservation with a PLGA scaffold while the control group (CG) was left for spontaneous healing. The dimensions were measured before and after operation at 1, 3, and 5 mm below the alveolar crest horizontally and the height of buccolingual bone vertically.

Results: According to the histologic analyses, the PLGA scaffold was resorbed within 4 months. CBCT imaging revealed a decrease in the horizontal crest dimension at three distinct coronoapical levels in SG, measuring 2.05 ± 1.05 mm at -1 mm, 1.51 ± 0.89 mm at -3mm, and 0.92 ± 0.7 mm at-5mm.CG showed readings of 1.22 ± 1 at-1mm, 0.92 ± 0.67at-3mm, and 0.73 ± 0.69 at -5 mm. In comparison to CG, SG showed a significant reduction in horizontal losses at -1 mm. Vertical crest dimensions decreased by 1.64 ± 1.11 mm for the buccal bone height and by 1.56 ± 1.08 mm for lingual bone height in SG; in CG, the buccal and lingual bone height had mean values of 2.08 ± 1.44 mm and 1.73 ± 1.27 mm, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference observed in the vertical losses between the groups.

Conclusions: Following a period of 4 months, the PLGA scaffold was completely resorbed. Based on CBCT measurements, horizontal resorption was lower than CG at -1 mm coronally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用聚乳酸-聚乙二醇酸支架进行拔牙后的牙槽窝保存:放射学和组织学评估
目的:评估拔牙窝的愈合过程以及使用聚乳酸共聚乙二醇酯支架(PLGA)保存牙槽嵴后发生的尺寸变化:本研究涉及 14 名患者的 28 颗牙齿的拔除。牙槽窝总数为 28 个,分为两组,包括 14 个试验牙槽窝和 14 个对照牙槽窝。研究组(SG)使用 PLGA 支架进行牙槽窝保存,而对照组(CG)则任其自然愈合。手术前后分别测量了水平方向牙槽嵴下 1、3 和 5 毫米处的尺寸以及垂直方向颊舌骨的高度:根据组织学分析,PLGA 支架在 4 个月内被吸收。CBCT 成像显示,SG 的水平嵴尺寸在三个不同的冠趾水平上有所减小,在-1 毫米处为 2.05 ± 1.05 毫米,在-3 毫米处为 1.51 ± 0.89 毫米,在-5 毫米处为 0.92 ± 0.7 毫米。与 CG 相比,SG 显著减少了-1 毫米处的水平损失。在 SG 中,颊骨高度和舌骨高度的垂直嵴尺寸分别减少了 1.64 ± 1.11 毫米和 1.56 ± 1.08 毫米;在 CG 中,颊骨高度和舌骨高度的平均值分别为 2.08 ± 1.44 毫米和 1.73 ± 1.27 毫米。两组之间的垂直损失没有明显的统计学差异:结论:4 个月后,PLGA 支架完全吸收。结论:4 个月后,PLGA 支架完全吸收,根据 CBCT 测量,水平吸收低于 CG,冠向为-1 毫米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical and Radiographic Outcome Short-span Fixed Partial Dentures Supported by 2 Immediately Placed Implants in the Anterior Mandible: A Long-term Retrospective Analysis. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Cast Metal to Milled Zirconia Implant Full-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis Frameworks. Reconstructive Peri-implant Site Development throughout an Implant Life Cycle. A Retrospective Study. Strain Assessment Around Two Short Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture with Different Attachment Systems: In- Vitro Study. The Effect of Basis Images and a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm on Artifact Expression and Trabecular Bone Architecture in the Vicinity of a Zirconium Dental Implant Placed in Different Mandibular Regions: An Ex Vivo Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1