The effect of listening to the sound of running water on pain and anxiety experienced during cannulation by hemodialysis patients: A randomized, controlled, open-label study.

Samet Sayilan, Aylin Aydin Sayilan, Zeynep Temiz, Didem Kandemir
{"title":"The effect of listening to the sound of running water on pain and anxiety experienced during cannulation by hemodialysis patients: A randomized, controlled, open-label study.","authors":"Samet Sayilan, Aylin Aydin Sayilan, Zeynep Temiz, Didem Kandemir","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.14200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study was conducted to determine the effect of the sound of running water, which we had not previously encountered being used in dialysis patients, on invasive pain and anxiety experienced during cannulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research was conducted as a randomized, controlled study. A descriptive form, a VAS pain scale, and state-trait anxiety scales were used as a data collection form. The data were analyzed on SPSS version 22.00 for Windows software. The independent groups t-test was applied to compare descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation, number, and percentage in independent groups, while categorical data were compared using the chi-square test. The effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable was tested using linear regression analysis. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was completed with 32 experimental and 33 control group patients. There was no significant difference in pre-intervention pain and anxiety between the groups. The pain levels of the patients after the first and 12th cannulations were significantly lower in the experimental group (p < 0.05). State and trait anxiety levels were also significantly lower in the experimental group at the 12th session (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that the sound of running water has a significant positive effect on pain and anxiety experienced during cannulation by dialysis patients. We recommend that clinicians apply such a simple method as listening to the sound of running water for reducing pain and anxiety during invasive procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94253,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"42-51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study was conducted to determine the effect of the sound of running water, which we had not previously encountered being used in dialysis patients, on invasive pain and anxiety experienced during cannulation.

Methods: The research was conducted as a randomized, controlled study. A descriptive form, a VAS pain scale, and state-trait anxiety scales were used as a data collection form. The data were analyzed on SPSS version 22.00 for Windows software. The independent groups t-test was applied to compare descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation, number, and percentage in independent groups, while categorical data were compared using the chi-square test. The effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable was tested using linear regression analysis. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: The study was completed with 32 experimental and 33 control group patients. There was no significant difference in pre-intervention pain and anxiety between the groups. The pain levels of the patients after the first and 12th cannulations were significantly lower in the experimental group (p < 0.05). State and trait anxiety levels were also significantly lower in the experimental group at the 12th session (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: We conclude that the sound of running water has a significant positive effect on pain and anxiety experienced during cannulation by dialysis patients. We recommend that clinicians apply such a simple method as listening to the sound of running water for reducing pain and anxiety during invasive procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听流水声对血液透析患者插管时疼痛和焦虑的影响:一项随机对照开放标签研究。
简介本研究旨在确定流水声(我们以前从未在透析患者中使用过)对插管时的侵入性疼痛和焦虑的影响:研究以随机对照研究的形式进行。数据收集采用描述性表格、VAS 疼痛量表和状态-特质焦虑量表。数据使用 SPSS 22.00 版 Windows 软件进行分析。采用独立组 t 检验比较各独立组的平均值、标准差、人数和百分比等描述性统计数字,而分类数据则采用卡方检验进行比较。使用线性回归分析检验自变量对因变量的影响:共有 32 名实验组和 33 名对照组患者完成了研究。两组患者在干预前的疼痛和焦虑程度没有明显差异。实验组患者在第一次和第 12 次插管后的疼痛程度明显降低(p 结论:实验组和对照组患者在第一次和第 12 次插管后的疼痛程度明显降低:我们得出结论,流水声对透析患者插管时的疼痛和焦虑有明显的积极影响。我们建议临床医生采用听流水声这种简单的方法来减轻侵入性操作过程中的疼痛和焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Plasmapheresis in a Tertiary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience. Diffusive Versus Convective Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Influencing Factors of Adherence to Phosphorus Control in Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis With Hyperphosphatemia: A Latent Profile Analysis. Intraoperative Collection of Ascitic Fluid With Intra- or Postoperative Reinfusion in Ovarian Cancer: Safety and Feasibility of a Roller Pumping Method. Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Therapy in Maintenance Hemodialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1