Predictive Factors for Regression versus Progression of Nonevacuated Posttraumatic Acute Extradural Hematoma.

Asian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1775731
Hany Elkholy, Hossam Elnoamany, Mohamed Adel Hussein
{"title":"Predictive Factors for Regression versus Progression of Nonevacuated Posttraumatic Acute Extradural Hematoma.","authors":"Hany Elkholy, Hossam Elnoamany, Mohamed Adel Hussein","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1775731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Study Design</b>  This study was a retrospective study conducted from October 2020 to October 2022 on 106 posttraumatic patients with acute extradural hematomas (EDHs) who were initially planned for conservative treatment. 74 patients had spontaneous EDH regression (EDHR), while 32 patients developed EDH progression (EDHP) and were shifted for surgery. The two groups were statistically compared regarding the different demographic, clinical, and radiographic factors to identify the significant predictors for regression versus progression of acute posttraumatic EDH. <b>Objectives</b>  Conventionally, urgent evacuation is the accepted management for EDH. However, several recent reports have described successful conservative management in selected patients. There are no adequate clues to verify patients who will have spontaneous EDHR from those at risk for EDHP and delayed surgery. The main objective of this study was to identify the significant predictors for possible regression versus progression of acute posttraumatic EDH initially planned for nonsurgical treatment. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  A retrospective study conducted over 2 years, included 106 head trauma patients with acute EDH, who were admitted to our department and were initially planned for conservative treatment. Various demographic, clinical, and radiographic factors were analyzed to verify the significant predictors for spontaneous EDHR (EDHR group) versus EDHP and subsequent surgical evacuation (EDHP group). <b>Results</b>  The mean age was 20.37 ± 12.712 years and the mean Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) was 12.83 ± 2.113. Total 69.8% of patients showed spontaneous EDHR, while 30.2% developed EDHP and were shifted for surgical evacuation. Statistical comparison showed that higher GCS ( <i>p</i>  = 0.002), frontal location ( <i>p</i>  = 0.022), and concomitant fissure fracture ( <i>p</i>  =  0.014) were the significant predictors for EDHR, while younger age ( <i>p</i>  = 0.006), persistent nausea/vomiting ( <i>p</i>  = 0.046), early computed tomography (CT) after trauma ( <i>p</i>  = 0.021), temporal location ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001), and coagulopathy ( <i>p</i>  = 0.001) were significantly associated with EDHP. <b>Conclusion</b>  Patients with traumatic EDH fitting the criteria of initial nonsurgical treatment necessitates 48 hours of close observation and serial CT scans at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours to confirm the regression or early detect the EDHP. Patients with high GCS, frontal hematomas, and associated fissure fracture are at low risk for EDHP. Increased alertness is mandatory for young age and patients with persistent nausea/vomiting, early CT scan, temporal hematomas, or coagulopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1775731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Design  This study was a retrospective study conducted from October 2020 to October 2022 on 106 posttraumatic patients with acute extradural hematomas (EDHs) who were initially planned for conservative treatment. 74 patients had spontaneous EDH regression (EDHR), while 32 patients developed EDH progression (EDHP) and were shifted for surgery. The two groups were statistically compared regarding the different demographic, clinical, and radiographic factors to identify the significant predictors for regression versus progression of acute posttraumatic EDH. Objectives  Conventionally, urgent evacuation is the accepted management for EDH. However, several recent reports have described successful conservative management in selected patients. There are no adequate clues to verify patients who will have spontaneous EDHR from those at risk for EDHP and delayed surgery. The main objective of this study was to identify the significant predictors for possible regression versus progression of acute posttraumatic EDH initially planned for nonsurgical treatment. Materials and Methods  A retrospective study conducted over 2 years, included 106 head trauma patients with acute EDH, who were admitted to our department and were initially planned for conservative treatment. Various demographic, clinical, and radiographic factors were analyzed to verify the significant predictors for spontaneous EDHR (EDHR group) versus EDHP and subsequent surgical evacuation (EDHP group). Results  The mean age was 20.37 ± 12.712 years and the mean Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) was 12.83 ± 2.113. Total 69.8% of patients showed spontaneous EDHR, while 30.2% developed EDHP and were shifted for surgical evacuation. Statistical comparison showed that higher GCS ( p  = 0.002), frontal location ( p  = 0.022), and concomitant fissure fracture ( p  =  0.014) were the significant predictors for EDHR, while younger age ( p  = 0.006), persistent nausea/vomiting ( p  = 0.046), early computed tomography (CT) after trauma ( p  = 0.021), temporal location ( p  < 0.001), and coagulopathy ( p  = 0.001) were significantly associated with EDHP. Conclusion  Patients with traumatic EDH fitting the criteria of initial nonsurgical treatment necessitates 48 hours of close observation and serial CT scans at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours to confirm the regression or early detect the EDHP. Patients with high GCS, frontal hematomas, and associated fissure fracture are at low risk for EDHP. Increased alertness is mandatory for young age and patients with persistent nausea/vomiting, early CT scan, temporal hematomas, or coagulopathy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非吸附性创伤后急性硬膜外血肿消退与恶化的预测因素
研究设计 本研究是一项回顾性研究,研究时间为 2020 年 10 月至 2022 年 10 月,研究对象为 106 名外伤后急性硬膜外血肿(EDH)患者,这些患者最初计划接受保守治疗。74例患者的硬膜外血肿自发消退(EDHR),32例患者的硬膜外血肿进展(EDHP),并转为手术治疗。对两组患者不同的人口统计学、临床和放射学因素进行了统计比较,以确定急性创伤后 EDH 消退与进展的重要预测因素。目的 传统上,紧急撤离是治疗 EDH 的公认方法。不过,最近有几篇报道介绍了对部分患者成功实施保守治疗的情况。目前还没有足够的线索来确认哪些患者会自发发生 EDHR,哪些患者有发生 EDHP 和延迟手术的风险。本研究的主要目的是确定最初计划接受非手术治疗的急性创伤后 EDH 可能消退或恶化的重要预测因素。材料和方法 这是一项历时两年的回顾性研究,共纳入了 106 例头部外伤急性 EDH 患者,这些患者均在我科住院,最初计划接受保守治疗。研究人员分析了各种人口统计学、临床和影像学因素,以验证自发性 EDHR(EDHR 组)与 EDHP 及随后的手术切除(EDHP 组)的重要预测因素。结果 患者平均年龄(20.37±12.712)岁,平均格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分(12.83±2.113)分。69.8%的患者表现为自发性 EDHR,30.2%的患者发展为 EDHP,需要转院进行手术排空。统计比较显示,较高的 GCS ( p = 0.002)、前额位置 ( p = 0.022)、合并裂隙骨折 ( p = 0.014) 是 EDHR 的重要预测因素,而较年轻 ( p = 0.006)、持续恶心/呕吐 ( p = 0.046)、创伤后早期计算机断层扫描 (CT) ( p = 0.021)、颞部位置 ( p p = 0.001) 与 EDHP 显著相关。结论 符合非手术治疗标准的外伤性 EDH 患者需要 48 小时的密切观察,并在 6、12、24 和 48 小时进行连续 CT 扫描,以确认 EDHP 的消退或早期发现 EDHP。GCS高、额部血肿和伴有裂隙骨折的患者发生EDHP的风险较低。年轻患者和持续恶心/呕吐、早期 CT 扫描、颞部血肿或凝血功能障碍的患者必须提高警惕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calvarial Tuberculosis: Shifting Paradigm from Surgical to Conservative Approach Ectopic Intrasphenoidal Growth Hormone Releasing Pituitary Adenoma Associated with an Intracranial Aneurysm. How Flow Diverter Selection Can Affect the Flow Changes within a Jailed Ophthalmic Artery: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study. Acute Hemorrhagic-Onset Atypical Meningioma: A Report of Two Cases with Emergent Resection Achieving Mid-Term Tumor Control and Neurological Preservation. Bow Hunter's Syndrome with Rotational Atlantoaxial Instability: A Rare Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1