Interview Versus Performance Assessment of Cognition as Predictors of Real-World Outcomes in a Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study in Schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia bulletin open Pub Date : 2024-08-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae020
Pasquale Pezzella, Edoardo Caporusso, Armida Mucci, Paola Bucci, Giulia M Giordano, Mario Amore, Paola Rocca, Alessandro Rossi, Alessandro Bertolino, Joseph Ventura, Silvana Galderisi, Mario Maj
{"title":"Interview Versus Performance Assessment of Cognition as Predictors of Real-World Outcomes in a Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study in Schizophrenia.","authors":"Pasquale Pezzella, Edoardo Caporusso, Armida Mucci, Paola Bucci, Giulia M Giordano, Mario Amore, Paola Rocca, Alessandro Rossi, Alessandro Bertolino, Joseph Ventura, Silvana Galderisi, Mario Maj","doi":"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) is an interview-based scale measuring cognitive impairment and its impact on functioning in subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ). It is approved as a coprimary measure of performance-based instruments, such as the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Recent research highlights negative symptoms, social cognition, and functional capacity as mediators of cognitive impairment's impact on functioning. This study compared mediation analysis outcomes using CAI or MCCB scores, providing insights into the utility of interview-based tools in research and clinical practice. The study included 618 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, recruited from 24 Italian psychiatric clinics. Neurocognitive assessments utilized both CAI and MCCB. Mediation analyses explored negative symptoms, social cognition, and functional capacity as mediators of the impact of neurocognition on real-life functioning domains. The study's results extend the validation of the CAI as a coprimary measure that provides valid information on the impact of cognitive impairment on real-life functioning and its possible mediators, complementing the information obtained using the MCCB. Interview-based cognitive assessment might be essential for understanding schizophrenia complexity and its impact on various cognitive and functional domains for clinicians, patients, and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94380,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia bulletin open","volume":"5 1","pages":"sgae020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia bulletin open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgae020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) is an interview-based scale measuring cognitive impairment and its impact on functioning in subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ). It is approved as a coprimary measure of performance-based instruments, such as the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Recent research highlights negative symptoms, social cognition, and functional capacity as mediators of cognitive impairment's impact on functioning. This study compared mediation analysis outcomes using CAI or MCCB scores, providing insights into the utility of interview-based tools in research and clinical practice. The study included 618 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, recruited from 24 Italian psychiatric clinics. Neurocognitive assessments utilized both CAI and MCCB. Mediation analyses explored negative symptoms, social cognition, and functional capacity as mediators of the impact of neurocognition on real-life functioning domains. The study's results extend the validation of the CAI as a coprimary measure that provides valid information on the impact of cognitive impairment on real-life functioning and its possible mediators, complementing the information obtained using the MCCB. Interview-based cognitive assessment might be essential for understanding schizophrenia complexity and its impact on various cognitive and functional domains for clinicians, patients, and caregivers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在一项大规模精神分裂症横断面研究中,认知能力的访谈评估与表现评估可预测现实世界的结果。
认知评估访谈(CAI)是一种基于访谈的量表,用于测量精神分裂症(SCZ)患者的认知障碍及其对功能的影响。它被批准作为基于表现的测量工具的辅助测量工具,如 "改善精神分裂症认知的测量和治疗研究共识认知电池"(MCCB)。最近的研究强调,阴性症状、社会认知和功能能力是认知障碍对功能影响的中介因素。本研究比较了使用 CAI 或 MCCB 评分进行中介分析的结果,为基于访谈的工具在研究和临床实践中的实用性提供了启示。研究对象包括从 24 家意大利精神病诊所招募的 618 名精神分裂症患者。神经认知评估同时使用了 CAI 和 MCCB。中介分析探讨了阴性症状、社会认知和功能能力对神经认知对现实生活功能领域影响的中介作用。研究结果进一步验证了 CAI 作为一种辅助测量方法的有效性,它能提供认知障碍对现实生活功能的影响及其可能的中介因素的有效信息,补充了使用 MCCB 所获得的信息。基于访谈的认知评估对于临床医生、患者和护理人员了解精神分裂症的复杂性及其对各种认知和功能领域的影响可能至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Among Youth at Clinical High Risk of Psychosis. Intranasal Oxytocin Combined With Social Skills Training for Schizophrenia: An Add-on Randomized Controlled Trial. Rationale and Challenges for a New Instrument for Remote Measurement of Negative Symptoms. Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia: New Research Agenda. Negative Symptoms and Their Associations With Other Clinical Variables and Working Memory Across the Schizophrenia Spectrum and Bipolar Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1