Analyzing the effect of undermining on suture forces during simulated skin flap surgeries with a three-dimensional finite element method

IF 2.5 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Computers & Graphics-Uk Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.cag.2024.104057
Wenzhangzhi Guo , Allison Tsz Kwan Lau , Joel C. Davies , Vito Forte , Eitan Grinspun , Lueder Alexander Kahrs
{"title":"Analyzing the effect of undermining on suture forces during simulated skin flap surgeries with a three-dimensional finite element method","authors":"Wenzhangzhi Guo ,&nbsp;Allison Tsz Kwan Lau ,&nbsp;Joel C. Davies ,&nbsp;Vito Forte ,&nbsp;Eitan Grinspun ,&nbsp;Lueder Alexander Kahrs","doi":"10.1016/j.cag.2024.104057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Skin flaps are common procedures used by surgeons to cover an excised area during the reconstruction of a defect. It is often a challenging task for a surgeon to come up with the most optimal design for a patient. In this paper, we set up a simulation system based on the finite element method for one of the most common flap types — the rhomboid flap. Instead of using the standard 2D planar patch, we constructed a 3D patch with multiple layers. This allowed us to investigate the impact of different undermining areas and depths. We compared the suture forces for each case and identified vertices with the largest suture force. The shape of the final suture line is also visualized for each case, which is an important clue when deciding on the most optimal skin flap orientation according to medical textbooks. We found that under the optimal undermining setup, the maximum suture force is around 0.7 N for top of the undermined layer and 1.0 N for bottom of the undermined layer. When measuring difference in final suture line shape, the maximum normalized Hausdorff distance is 0.099, which suggests that different undermining region can have significant impact on the shape of the suture line, especially in the tail region. After analyzing the suture force plots, we provided recommendations on the most optimal undermining region for rhomboid flaps.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50628,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Graphics-Uk","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 104057"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0097849324001924/pdfft?md5=2b5edd39561a506e03eb5a66dbf3e9fc&pid=1-s2.0-S0097849324001924-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Graphics-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0097849324001924","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skin flaps are common procedures used by surgeons to cover an excised area during the reconstruction of a defect. It is often a challenging task for a surgeon to come up with the most optimal design for a patient. In this paper, we set up a simulation system based on the finite element method for one of the most common flap types — the rhomboid flap. Instead of using the standard 2D planar patch, we constructed a 3D patch with multiple layers. This allowed us to investigate the impact of different undermining areas and depths. We compared the suture forces for each case and identified vertices with the largest suture force. The shape of the final suture line is also visualized for each case, which is an important clue when deciding on the most optimal skin flap orientation according to medical textbooks. We found that under the optimal undermining setup, the maximum suture force is around 0.7 N for top of the undermined layer and 1.0 N for bottom of the undermined layer. When measuring difference in final suture line shape, the maximum normalized Hausdorff distance is 0.099, which suggests that different undermining region can have significant impact on the shape of the suture line, especially in the tail region. After analyzing the suture force plots, we provided recommendations on the most optimal undermining region for rhomboid flaps.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用三维有限元方法分析在模拟皮瓣手术中破坏对缝合力的影响
皮瓣是外科医生在重建缺损时用来覆盖切除区域的常用程序。对于外科医生来说,为患者设计出最理想的皮瓣往往是一项极具挑战性的任务。在本文中,我们针对最常见的皮瓣类型之一--斜方形皮瓣,建立了一个基于有限元法的模拟系统。我们没有使用标准的二维平面补片,而是构建了一个具有多层的三维补片。这样,我们就能研究不同破坏区域和深度的影响。我们比较了每个病例的缝合力,并确定了缝合力最大的顶点。每个病例最终缝合线的形状也可视化,这是在根据医学教科书决定最佳皮瓣方向时的重要线索。我们发现,在最佳埋线设置下,埋线层顶部的最大缝合力约为 0.7 N,埋线层底部的最大缝合力约为 1.0 N。在测量最终缝合线形状的差异时,最大归一化豪斯多夫距离为 0.099,这表明不同的破坏区域会对缝合线的形状产生显著影响,尤其是在尾部区域。在分析了缝合力图之后,我们对斜方形皮瓣的最佳下拉区域提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Graphics-Uk
Computers & Graphics-Uk 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
173
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Graphics is dedicated to disseminate information on research and applications of computer graphics (CG) techniques. The journal encourages articles on: 1. Research and applications of interactive computer graphics. We are particularly interested in novel interaction techniques and applications of CG to problem domains. 2. State-of-the-art papers on late-breaking, cutting-edge research on CG. 3. Information on innovative uses of graphics principles and technologies. 4. Tutorial papers on both teaching CG principles and innovative uses of CG in education.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Visual Analytics systems with guidance: A task-driven methodology Learning geometric complexes for 3D shape classification RenalViz: Visual analysis of cohorts with chronic kidney disease Enhancing semantic mapping in text-to-image diffusion via Gather-and-Bind CGLight: An effective indoor illumination estimation method based on improved convmixer and GauGAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1