A critical review for travel satisfaction and subjective well-being

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101899
Hao Dong , Haslinda Hashim , Nitty Hirawaty Kamarulzaman
{"title":"A critical review for travel satisfaction and subjective well-being","authors":"Hao Dong ,&nbsp;Haslinda Hashim ,&nbsp;Nitty Hirawaty Kamarulzaman","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Travelers increasingly consider their emotional needs when making travel mode choices. While travel satisfaction (TS) is insufficient for a comprehensive evaluation of travel modes, subjective well-being (SWB) has gained attention. However, the relationship and differences between subjective well-being and TS have yet to receive adequate attention.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This study aims to clarify the correlations and differences between TS and subjective well-being from three aspects: definition, current research, and relationship mechanism, using a literature review method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study results show that (1) TS can be seen as a component of the definition of subjective well-being. (2) Further research is needed on both subjective well-being and TS in the Chinese context. (3) Subjective well-being provides a more accurate and comprehensive representation of passengers' evaluations of travel modes than TS. From another perspective, TS is more suitable for measuring the influence of emotional factors on travel mode choice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The result provides a valuable reference for understanding subjective well-being and TS, distinguishing the differences between the two concepts and the research value of both. It helps marketers develop and implement effective marketing strategies to encourage passengers to choose eco-friendly travel modes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 101899"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524001452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Travelers increasingly consider their emotional needs when making travel mode choices. While travel satisfaction (TS) is insufficient for a comprehensive evaluation of travel modes, subjective well-being (SWB) has gained attention. However, the relationship and differences between subjective well-being and TS have yet to receive adequate attention.

Method

This study aims to clarify the correlations and differences between TS and subjective well-being from three aspects: definition, current research, and relationship mechanism, using a literature review method.

Results

The study results show that (1) TS can be seen as a component of the definition of subjective well-being. (2) Further research is needed on both subjective well-being and TS in the Chinese context. (3) Subjective well-being provides a more accurate and comprehensive representation of passengers' evaluations of travel modes than TS. From another perspective, TS is more suitable for measuring the influence of emotional factors on travel mode choice.

Conclusions

The result provides a valuable reference for understanding subjective well-being and TS, distinguishing the differences between the two concepts and the research value of both. It helps marketers develop and implement effective marketing strategies to encourage passengers to choose eco-friendly travel modes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对旅行满意度和主观幸福感的严格审查
导言旅行者在选择旅行方式时越来越多地考虑自己的情感需求。虽然旅行满意度(TS)不足以对旅行方式进行全面评价,但主观幸福感(SWB)却受到了关注。方法本研究采用文献综述法,旨在从定义、研究现状和关系机制三个方面厘清主观幸福感与主观幸福感之间的相关性和差异性。结果研究结果表明:(1)主观幸福感可被视为主观幸福感定义的一个组成部分。(2)在中国背景下,主观幸福感和 TS 都需要进一步研究。(3) 与 TS 相比,主观幸福感能更准确、更全面地反映乘客对出行方式的评价。从另一个角度看,TS 更适合测量情感因素对旅行方式选择的影响。它有助于营销人员制定和实施有效的营销策略,鼓励乘客选择环保出行方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Association between the risk of aberrant driving behavior and sleep disorder indices: A pilot study involving urban taxi drivers Driver vehicle crashes and mental health challenges among commuter college students The biosocial health of U.S. long haul truckers: Syndemics of the road Examining healthcare access with physical vs. telehealth options: Promise and peril for socially vulnerable older adults Physical activity and muscle activity of riding electric scooters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1