Nonparametric worst-case bounds for publication bias on the summary receiver operating characteristic curve.

IF 1.4 4区 数学 Q3 BIOLOGY Biometrics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujae080
Yi Zhou, Ao Huang, Satoshi Hattori
{"title":"Nonparametric worst-case bounds for publication bias on the summary receiver operating characteristic curve.","authors":"Yi Zhou, Ao Huang, Satoshi Hattori","doi":"10.1093/biomtc/ujae080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve has been recommended as one important meta-analytical summary to represent the accuracy of a diagnostic test in the presence of heterogeneous cutoff values. However, selective publication of diagnostic studies for meta-analysis can induce publication bias (PB) on the estimate of the SROC curve. Several sensitivity analysis methods have been developed to quantify PB on the SROC curve, and all these methods utilize parametric selection functions to model the selective publication mechanism. The main contribution of this article is to propose a new sensitivity analysis approach that derives the worst-case bounds for the SROC curve by adopting nonparametric selection functions under minimal assumptions. The estimation procedures of the worst-case bounds use the Monte Carlo method to approximate the bias on the SROC curves along with the corresponding area under the curves, and then the maximum and minimum values of PB under a range of marginal selection probabilities are optimized by nonlinear programming. We apply the proposed method to real-world meta-analyses to show that the worst-case bounds of the SROC curves can provide useful insights for discussing the robustness of meta-analytical findings on diagnostic test accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8930,"journal":{"name":"Biometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujae080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve has been recommended as one important meta-analytical summary to represent the accuracy of a diagnostic test in the presence of heterogeneous cutoff values. However, selective publication of diagnostic studies for meta-analysis can induce publication bias (PB) on the estimate of the SROC curve. Several sensitivity analysis methods have been developed to quantify PB on the SROC curve, and all these methods utilize parametric selection functions to model the selective publication mechanism. The main contribution of this article is to propose a new sensitivity analysis approach that derives the worst-case bounds for the SROC curve by adopting nonparametric selection functions under minimal assumptions. The estimation procedures of the worst-case bounds use the Monte Carlo method to approximate the bias on the SROC curves along with the corresponding area under the curves, and then the maximum and minimum values of PB under a range of marginal selection probabilities are optimized by nonlinear programming. We apply the proposed method to real-world meta-analyses to show that the worst-case bounds of the SROC curves can provide useful insights for discussing the robustness of meta-analytical findings on diagnostic test accuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非参数最坏情况下接收者操作特征曲线汇总的发表偏倚界限。
接受者操作特征曲线(SROC)总结被推荐为一种重要的荟萃分析总结,用于在存在不同截断值的情况下表示诊断测试的准确性。然而,选择性发表用于荟萃分析的诊断研究可能会导致 SROC 曲线的估计值出现发表偏倚(PB)。目前已开发出几种敏感性分析方法来量化 SROC 曲线上的发表偏倚,所有这些方法都利用参数选择函数来模拟选择性发表机制。本文的主要贡献在于提出了一种新的敏感性分析方法,通过在最小假设条件下采用非参数选择函数,推导出 SROC 曲线的最坏情况界限。最坏情况界限的估算程序使用蒙特卡罗方法来近似 SROC 曲线上的偏差以及相应的曲线下面积,然后通过非线性编程优化一系列边际选择概率下 PB 的最大值和最小值。我们将所提出的方法应用于现实世界的荟萃分析,结果表明 SROC 曲线的最坏情况界限可以为讨论诊断检测准确性荟萃分析结果的稳健性提供有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrics
Biometrics 生物-生物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
178
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Biometric Society is an international society promoting the development and application of statistical and mathematical theory and methods in the biosciences, including agriculture, biomedical science and public health, ecology, environmental sciences, forestry, and allied disciplines. The Society welcomes as members statisticians, mathematicians, biological scientists, and others devoted to interdisciplinary efforts in advancing the collection and interpretation of information in the biosciences. The Society sponsors the biennial International Biometric Conference, held in sites throughout the world; through its National Groups and Regions, it also Society sponsors regional and local meetings.
期刊最新文献
Bayesian inference for multivariate probit model with latent envelope. Absolute risk from double nested case-control designs: cause-specific proportional hazards models with and without augmented estimating equations. Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with an imperfect gold standard. Optimal refinement of strata to balance covariates. PathGPS: discover shared genetic architecture using GWAS summary data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1