Interactions during falls with environmental objects: evidence from real-life falls in long-term care captured on video.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05306-5
Nataliya Shishov, Vicki Komisar, Daniel S Marigold, Jean-Sébastien Blouin, Stephen N Robinovitch
{"title":"Interactions during falls with environmental objects: evidence from real-life falls in long-term care captured on video.","authors":"Nataliya Shishov, Vicki Komisar, Daniel S Marigold, Jean-Sébastien Blouin, Stephen N Robinovitch","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05306-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Falls are the leading cause of injuries in older adults. Environmental objects (such as furniture, walls, and handrails) may act as hazards or facilitators to balance maintenance and safe landing. There is lack of objective evidence on how older adults interact with objects during falls. We addressed this gap by characterizing body part contacts with objects other than the floor during real-life falls in long-term care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed videos of 1759 falls experienced by 584 residents to characterize the prevalence of contacts with objects before, during, and after fall initiation. Using generalized estimating equations, we compared the prevalence of falls with versus without contact to objects after fall initiation. Using linear mixed models, we tested for differences across body parts in the probability of contacting objects after fall initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In nearly one-third of falls, interactions with objects (e.g., trips over objects, loss of support with objects) or with other people (e.g., being pushed by another person) had a primary role in causing imbalance and initiating the fall. After fall initiation, participants contacted objects in 60% of falls, with intentional hand contacts to objects via reach-to-grasp or bracing being the most common type of interaction (Probability ± SE = 0.32 ± 0.01), followed by unintentional impacts to the torso (0.21 ± 0.01) and head (0.16 ± 0.01). Intentional hand contact to an object was more common during forward than backward falls (p < 0.001), while head and torso contacts to objects were more common during backward and sideways falls than forward falls (multiple p values ≤ 0.003). The hand most often contacted chairs, wheelchairs or couches, followed by tables or counters, walls, other people, walkers, and handrails. The head, torso, and shoulder most often contacted a wall.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most falls in long-term care involved contacts with objects other than the ground, indicating that complex environments often accompany falls in long-term care. Higher probabilities of intentional hand contacts in forward falls, versus unintentional head and torso impacts in backward and sideways falls may reflect the influence of being able to visualize and adjust one's falling patterns to nearby objects.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368007/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05306-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Falls are the leading cause of injuries in older adults. Environmental objects (such as furniture, walls, and handrails) may act as hazards or facilitators to balance maintenance and safe landing. There is lack of objective evidence on how older adults interact with objects during falls. We addressed this gap by characterizing body part contacts with objects other than the floor during real-life falls in long-term care.

Methods: We analyzed videos of 1759 falls experienced by 584 residents to characterize the prevalence of contacts with objects before, during, and after fall initiation. Using generalized estimating equations, we compared the prevalence of falls with versus without contact to objects after fall initiation. Using linear mixed models, we tested for differences across body parts in the probability of contacting objects after fall initiation.

Results: In nearly one-third of falls, interactions with objects (e.g., trips over objects, loss of support with objects) or with other people (e.g., being pushed by another person) had a primary role in causing imbalance and initiating the fall. After fall initiation, participants contacted objects in 60% of falls, with intentional hand contacts to objects via reach-to-grasp or bracing being the most common type of interaction (Probability ± SE = 0.32 ± 0.01), followed by unintentional impacts to the torso (0.21 ± 0.01) and head (0.16 ± 0.01). Intentional hand contact to an object was more common during forward than backward falls (p < 0.001), while head and torso contacts to objects were more common during backward and sideways falls than forward falls (multiple p values ≤ 0.003). The hand most often contacted chairs, wheelchairs or couches, followed by tables or counters, walls, other people, walkers, and handrails. The head, torso, and shoulder most often contacted a wall.

Conclusions: Most falls in long-term care involved contacts with objects other than the ground, indicating that complex environments often accompany falls in long-term care. Higher probabilities of intentional hand contacts in forward falls, versus unintentional head and torso impacts in backward and sideways falls may reflect the influence of being able to visualize and adjust one's falling patterns to nearby objects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跌倒时与环境物体的互动:长期护理中真实跌倒的视频证据。
背景:跌倒是老年人受伤的主要原因。环境中的物体(如家具、墙壁和扶手)可能对保持平衡和安全着陆造成危害,也可能起到促进作用。关于老年人在跌倒时如何与物体互动,目前还缺乏客观证据。为了填补这一空白,我们对长期护理机构中老年人在真实跌倒过程中身体部位与地面以外物体的接触情况进行了分析:方法: 我们分析了 584 名住院者经历的 1759 次跌倒的视频,以描述在跌倒开始之前、期间和之后与物体接触的普遍程度。利用广义估计方程,我们比较了跌倒发生后与物体接触和未接触物体的跌倒发生率。利用线性混合模型,我们检验了不同身体部位在跌倒发生后接触物体概率的差异:在近三分之一的跌倒中,与物体的相互作用(如被物体绊倒、失去物体的支撑)或与他人的相互作用(如被他人推倒)是导致失衡和引发跌倒的主要原因。摔倒开始后,60%的摔倒参与者会接触到物体,其中通过伸手抓握或支撑而有意用手接触物体是最常见的互动类型(概率 ± SE = 0.32 ± 0.01),其次是无意撞击躯干(0.21 ± 0.01)和头部(0.16 ± 0.01)。与向后跌倒相比,向前跌倒时有意用手接触物体的情况更为常见(P 结论:与向后跌倒相比,向前跌倒时有意用手接触物体的情况更为常见:长期护理中的大多数跌倒都与地面以外的物体发生接触,这表明长期护理中的跌倒往往伴随着复杂的环境。向前跌倒时有意用手接触物体的概率高于向后跌倒和侧向跌倒时无意撞击头部和躯干的概率,这可能反映了能够根据附近物体的情况观察和调整跌倒模式的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Association between healthy lifestyle and frailty in adults and mediating role of weight-adjusted waist index: results from NHANES Determinants of received care time among Finnish home care clients and assisted living facility residents: a time-motion study Effects of graphene far-infrared and social network interventions on depression, anxiety and dementia in older adults Cross-sectional association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults: the SONIC study Creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio and frailty in older adults: a longitudinal cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1