Clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in renal transplant recipients.

IF 3.1 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s12928-024-01042-0
Viroj Muangsillapasart, Yuta Morioka, Masashi Nakao, Hiroyuki Arashi, Junichi Yamaguchi
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in renal transplant recipients.","authors":"Viroj Muangsillapasart, Yuta Morioka, Masashi Nakao, Hiroyuki Arashi, Junichi Yamaguchi","doi":"10.1007/s12928-024-01042-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endovascular treatment (EVT) for peripheral artery disease in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a common practice in contemporary medicine and its effectiveness is widely acknowledged. However, refractory ulcers can occasionally be encountered, particularly in patients who underwent renal transplantation (RT), even after successful EVT. To date, there have been no data on prognosis reported following EVT for CLTI in RT recipients. We included all RT recipients who underwent EVT in our hospital between 2010 and 2022. We analyzed data from 43 limbs with ischemic ulcerations classified as Rutherford class 5 or 6, which were managed solely with EVT (i.e., no bypass surgery was performed). The primary and secondary outcomes of our study were the incidence of complete wound healing and major adverse limb events (MALE), including clinically driven target vessel revascularization, major amputation, and all-cause death. The median follow-up was 31 months. The mean age of the study population was 64.7 ± 8.7 years, with predominantly male participants (79.1%). The overall wound healing rate was 34.9%. Kaplan-Meier curve revealed that wound healing rates at 1 and 3 years were 33.6% and 40.9%, respectively. The wound healing rates of RT recipients who underwent EVT for CLTI were found to be less than satisfactory.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-024-01042-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endovascular treatment (EVT) for peripheral artery disease in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a common practice in contemporary medicine and its effectiveness is widely acknowledged. However, refractory ulcers can occasionally be encountered, particularly in patients who underwent renal transplantation (RT), even after successful EVT. To date, there have been no data on prognosis reported following EVT for CLTI in RT recipients. We included all RT recipients who underwent EVT in our hospital between 2010 and 2022. We analyzed data from 43 limbs with ischemic ulcerations classified as Rutherford class 5 or 6, which were managed solely with EVT (i.e., no bypass surgery was performed). The primary and secondary outcomes of our study were the incidence of complete wound healing and major adverse limb events (MALE), including clinically driven target vessel revascularization, major amputation, and all-cause death. The median follow-up was 31 months. The mean age of the study population was 64.7 ± 8.7 years, with predominantly male participants (79.1%). The overall wound healing rate was 34.9%. Kaplan-Meier curve revealed that wound healing rates at 1 and 3 years were 33.6% and 40.9%, respectively. The wound healing rates of RT recipients who underwent EVT for CLTI were found to be less than satisfactory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾移植受者慢性肢体缺血血管内治疗的临床效果。
对慢性肢体缺血(CLTI)患者的外周动脉疾病进行血管内治疗(EVT)是当代医学的常见做法,其有效性已得到广泛认可。然而,即使 EVT 取得成功,偶尔也会出现难治性溃疡,特别是在接受肾移植(RT)的患者中。迄今为止,还没有关于RT受者接受EVT治疗后CLTI预后的数据报告。我们纳入了 2010 年至 2022 年期间在我院接受 EVT 的所有 RT 受者。我们分析了 43 条肢体的数据,这些肢体的缺血性溃疡被归类为卢瑟福 5 级或 6 级,仅接受了 EVT 治疗(即未实施搭桥手术)。我们研究的主要和次要结果是伤口完全愈合和肢体主要不良事件(MALE)的发生率,包括临床驱动的靶血管血运重建、主要截肢和全因死亡。中位随访时间为 31 个月。研究对象的平均年龄为(64.7 ± 8.7)岁,主要为男性(79.1%)。总体伤口愈合率为 34.9%。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示,1 年和 3 年的伤口愈合率分别为 33.6% 和 40.9%。研究发现,因 CLTI 而接受 EVT 治疗的 RT 受者的伤口愈合率并不令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
期刊最新文献
3D printing-enhanced transcatheter closure of residual shunts post-ventricular septal perforation: multimodal imaging's crucial role. Physician attending cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for early aortic structural valve deterioration: non-invasive method to identify the regurgitate location. Efficacy of R-N cusp-overlap view as a complementary approach for optimal neocommissural alignment with Navitor valve. Assessment of fractal ratio of vessel diameters in coronary bifurcation lesions by angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Uncrossable aortic stenosis during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: application of balloon-assisted tracking technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1