{"title":"Utilizing risk factors to guide treatment decisions in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.","authors":"Paolo Lopedote, Adam S Kittai, Alexey Danilov","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2024.2398483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the era of chemo-immunotherapy, high-risk factors unequivocally predicted inferior outcomes for patients with CLL. The widespread adoption of BTK inhibitors has challenged the practical implications of such testing, as many patients have improved outcomes despite the presence of high-risk features. The impact of adverse prognostic factors, such as unmutated <i>IGHV</i>, on survival has been ameliorated by continuous treatment with BTK inhibitors, but not by finite-duration therapy with venetoclax-based combinations. Furthermore, <i>TP53</i> abnormalities continue to be associated with worse outcomes in the era of novel agents. New treatment modalities, such as pirtobrutinib, lisocabtagene maraleucel, and ongoing studies combining BTK inhibitors with venetoclax, raise new questions on the significance of prognostic factors of survival for patients with CLL.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Herein, we summarized the available literature on patients with CLL harboring high-risk biomarkers, with a focus on data from key clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Testing for prognostic biomarkers will remain relevant to identify patients who may have increased benefit from novel therapeutic strategies, such as combination therapies and novel agents. Patients with high-risk disease should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2398483","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In the era of chemo-immunotherapy, high-risk factors unequivocally predicted inferior outcomes for patients with CLL. The widespread adoption of BTK inhibitors has challenged the practical implications of such testing, as many patients have improved outcomes despite the presence of high-risk features. The impact of adverse prognostic factors, such as unmutated IGHV, on survival has been ameliorated by continuous treatment with BTK inhibitors, but not by finite-duration therapy with venetoclax-based combinations. Furthermore, TP53 abnormalities continue to be associated with worse outcomes in the era of novel agents. New treatment modalities, such as pirtobrutinib, lisocabtagene maraleucel, and ongoing studies combining BTK inhibitors with venetoclax, raise new questions on the significance of prognostic factors of survival for patients with CLL.
Areas covered: Herein, we summarized the available literature on patients with CLL harboring high-risk biomarkers, with a focus on data from key clinical trials.
Expert opinion: Testing for prognostic biomarkers will remain relevant to identify patients who may have increased benefit from novel therapeutic strategies, such as combination therapies and novel agents. Patients with high-risk disease should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.