Utilization of maternal health care services among pastoralist communities in Marsabit County, Kenya: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1186/s12978-024-01865-3
Dahabo Adi Galgalo, Peter Mokaya, Shalini Chauhan, Evans Kasmai Kiptulon, Girma Alemu Wami, Ákos Várnagy, Viktória Prémusz
{"title":"Utilization of maternal health care services among pastoralist communities in Marsabit County, Kenya: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Dahabo Adi Galgalo, Peter Mokaya, Shalini Chauhan, Evans Kasmai Kiptulon, Girma Alemu Wami, Ákos Várnagy, Viktória Prémusz","doi":"10.1186/s12978-024-01865-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improving maternal healthcare services is crucial to achieving the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG-3), which aims to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity. There is a consensus among different researchers that proper utilization of maternal healthcare services can improve the reproductive health of women, and this can be achieved by providing Antenatal Care (ANC) during pregnancy, Health Facility Delivery (HFD), and Postnatal Care (PNC) to all pregnant women. The main aim of this study was to investigate the utilization and factors associated with maternal and child healthcare services among women of reproductive age in the pastoralist communities in Kenya.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 180 pastoralist women who gave birth in the past two years across ten mobile villages in Marsabit County between 2nd January and 29th February 2019. Three key outcomes were analyzed, whether they attended ANC 4+ visits, delivered at HF, and received PNC. Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted by IBM SPSS27.0 following Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 180 eligible pastoralist women (mean age 27.44 ± 5.13 years), 92.2% were illiterate, 93.9% were married, 33.3% were in polygamy, and 14.4% had mobile phones. The median commuting distance was 15.00 (10-74) km, 41.7% attended ANC 4+, 33.3% HFD, and 42.8% PNC. Those women residing close (≤ 15 km) to a health facility had a threefold higher ANC 4+ (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.47-6.53), 2.8-fold higher HFD (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.34-5.84), and 2.5-fold higher PNC (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.19-5.22) probability. The likelihood was 30-fold higher for ANC 4+ (OR 29.88, 95% CI 6.68-133.62), 2.5-fold higher for HFD (OR 2.56, 95% CI 0.99-6.63), and 60-fold higher for PNC (OR 60.46, 95% CI 10.43-350.55) in women with mobile phones. A monogamous marriage meant a fivefold higher ANC 4+ (OR 5.17, 95% CI 1.88-14.23), 1.6-fold higher HFD (OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.77-3.62), and a sevenfold higher PNC (OR 7.05, 95% CI 2.35-21.19) likelihood. Hosmer Lemeshow test indicated a good-fitting model for ANC 4+, HFD, and PNC (p = 0.790, p = 0.441, p = 0.937, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, the utilization of three essential maternal health services is low. Geographic proximity, monogamous marriage, and possession of mobile phones were significant predictors. Therefore, it is recommended that stakeholders take the initiative to bring this service closer to the pastoralist community by providing mobile health outreach and health education.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01865-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Improving maternal healthcare services is crucial to achieving the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG-3), which aims to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity. There is a consensus among different researchers that proper utilization of maternal healthcare services can improve the reproductive health of women, and this can be achieved by providing Antenatal Care (ANC) during pregnancy, Health Facility Delivery (HFD), and Postnatal Care (PNC) to all pregnant women. The main aim of this study was to investigate the utilization and factors associated with maternal and child healthcare services among women of reproductive age in the pastoralist communities in Kenya.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 180 pastoralist women who gave birth in the past two years across ten mobile villages in Marsabit County between 2nd January and 29th February 2019. Three key outcomes were analyzed, whether they attended ANC 4+ visits, delivered at HF, and received PNC. Pearson χ2 test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted by IBM SPSS27.0 following Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results: Of the 180 eligible pastoralist women (mean age 27.44 ± 5.13 years), 92.2% were illiterate, 93.9% were married, 33.3% were in polygamy, and 14.4% had mobile phones. The median commuting distance was 15.00 (10-74) km, 41.7% attended ANC 4+, 33.3% HFD, and 42.8% PNC. Those women residing close (≤ 15 km) to a health facility had a threefold higher ANC 4+ (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.47-6.53), 2.8-fold higher HFD (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.34-5.84), and 2.5-fold higher PNC (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.19-5.22) probability. The likelihood was 30-fold higher for ANC 4+ (OR 29.88, 95% CI 6.68-133.62), 2.5-fold higher for HFD (OR 2.56, 95% CI 0.99-6.63), and 60-fold higher for PNC (OR 60.46, 95% CI 10.43-350.55) in women with mobile phones. A monogamous marriage meant a fivefold higher ANC 4+ (OR 5.17, 95% CI 1.88-14.23), 1.6-fold higher HFD (OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.77-3.62), and a sevenfold higher PNC (OR 7.05, 95% CI 2.35-21.19) likelihood. Hosmer Lemeshow test indicated a good-fitting model for ANC 4+, HFD, and PNC (p = 0.790, p = 0.441, p = 0.937, respectively).

Conclusion: In conclusion, the utilization of three essential maternal health services is low. Geographic proximity, monogamous marriage, and possession of mobile phones were significant predictors. Therefore, it is recommended that stakeholders take the initiative to bring this service closer to the pastoralist community by providing mobile health outreach and health education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚马萨比特县牧民社区孕产妇保健服务利用情况:横断面调查。
背景:改善孕产妇保健服务对于实现旨在降低孕产妇死亡率和发病率的可持续发展目标(SDG-3)至关重要。不同研究人员已达成共识,即适当利用孕产妇保健服务可改善妇女的生殖健康,而这可通过向所有孕妇提供孕期产前护理(ANC)、医疗机构接生(HFD)和产后护理(PNC)来实现。本研究的主要目的是调查肯尼亚牧区育龄妇女对母婴保健服务的利用情况及其相关因素:方法:2019 年 1 月 2 日至 2 月 29 日,在马萨比特县的 10 个流动村庄对过去两年分娩的 180 名牧民妇女进行了横断面调查。调查分析了三项主要结果,即她们是否参加了 ANC 4+ 次访视、是否在 HF 分娩以及是否接受了 PNC。根据加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)指南,采用 IBM SPSS27.0 进行了皮尔逊χ2 检验和多元逻辑回归分析。显著性水平设定为 p 结果:在 180 名符合条件的牧民妇女(平均年龄为 27.44 ± 5.13 岁)中,92.2% 为文盲,93.9% 已婚,33.3% 为一夫多妻制,14.4% 有手机。通勤距离的中位数为 15.00(10-74)千米,41.7% 的人参加过 4 次以上的产前保健,33.3% 的人参加过高频产前保健,42.8% 的人参加过孕前保健。那些居住在医疗机构附近(≤ 15 公里)的妇女,其产前检查 4+ 的概率高出三倍(OR 3.10,95% CI 1.47-6.53),高频产前检查的概率高出 2.8 倍(OR 2.80,95% CI 1.34-5.84),产前护理的概率高出 2.5 倍(OR 2.49,95% CI 1.19-5.22)。使用手机的女性获得 ANC 4+ 的概率高出 30 倍(OR 29.88,95% CI 6.68-133.62),获得 HFD 的概率高出 2.5 倍(OR 2.56,95% CI 0.99-6.63),获得 PNC 的概率高出 60 倍(OR 60.46,95% CI 10.43-350.55)。一夫一妻制婚姻意味着 ANC 4+ 的可能性高出 5 倍(OR 5.17,95% CI 1.88-14.23),HFD 高出 1.6 倍(OR 1.67,95% CI 0.77-3.62),PNC 高出 7 倍(OR 7.05,95% CI 2.35-21.19)。Hosmer Lemeshow 检验表明,ANC 4+、HFD 和 PNC 的拟合模型良好(分别为 p = 0.790、p = 0.441、p = 0.937):总之,三种基本孕产妇保健服务的利用率较低。地理位置远近、一夫一妻制婚姻和拥有手机是重要的预测因素。因此,建议利益相关者采取主动行动,通过提供流动医疗外展和健康教育,使这项服务更贴近牧民社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Burden of uterine cancer in China from 1990 to 2021 and 15-year projection: a systematic analysis and comparison with global levels. "I managed to stand on my own. I saved my baby's life.": qualitative analysis of birth experiences from women living with HIV in Cape Town, South Africa. Assessment of the impact an educational intervention on post-traumatic stress disorder and social cognitive theory constructs in women with sexual assault experience: a study protocol for a clinical trial. The reasons for and influences of unintended teenage pregnancy in Kericho county, Kenya: a qualitative study. Men's involvement in family planning programs: an exploratory study from Karachi, Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1