The effects of proton pump inhibitors during pregnancy on treatment of preeclampsia, and related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101478
Kate Mills, Annie R A McDOUGALL, Annie Tan, Maureen Makama, Phi-Yen Nguyen, Elizabeth Armari, Zoe Bradfield, Roxanne Hastie, A Metin Gulmezoglu, Anne Ammerdorffer, Joshua P Vogel
{"title":"The effects of proton pump inhibitors during pregnancy on treatment of preeclampsia, and related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kate Mills, Annie R A McDOUGALL, Annie Tan, Maureen Makama, Phi-Yen Nguyen, Elizabeth Armari, Zoe Bradfield, Roxanne Hastie, A Metin Gulmezoglu, Anne Ammerdorffer, Joshua P Vogel","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review evaluated the available evidence of the effects of PPIs during pregnancy on preeclampsia and related maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Global Medicus Index) were searched on 17 November 2023.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Randomized controlled trials involving pregnant women, using any class or dose of PPIs, were eligible.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal and synthesis methods: </strong>Meta-analysis was conducted for all outcomes of interest, with random-effects models. Results were presented as risk ratios or mean difference. Quality assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) assessment was completed to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023423673).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search identified 3,879 records, which were screened by two authors independently. Nine reports (describing eight trials) met our eligibility criteria, however six trials were ultimately excluded from our analysis as women were only given PPIs immediately prior to Cesarean section for acid aspiration prevention. The two trials included in the meta-analysis evaluated the treatment of 177 women with diagnosed preeclampsia. For the primary outcomes, moderate-certainty evidence showed there is likely no effect of the use of PPIs on risk of HELLP syndrome (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.37 - 3.99, I² = 0%) or perinatal mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.36 - 1.79, I² = 0%), while there were insufficient data to meta-analyse all other primary outcomes, including eclampsia and neonatal mortality. No trials investigated PPIs for preventing preeclampsia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the limited outcome data we are uncertain of the effect of PPIs in women with preeclampsia. Further trials are required to determine what (if any) effects PPIs might have for preeclampsia prevention or treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101478","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review evaluated the available evidence of the effects of PPIs during pregnancy on preeclampsia and related maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes.

Data sources: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Global Medicus Index) were searched on 17 November 2023.

Study eligibility criteria: Randomized controlled trials involving pregnant women, using any class or dose of PPIs, were eligible.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Meta-analysis was conducted for all outcomes of interest, with random-effects models. Results were presented as risk ratios or mean difference. Quality assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) assessment was completed to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023423673).

Results: Our search identified 3,879 records, which were screened by two authors independently. Nine reports (describing eight trials) met our eligibility criteria, however six trials were ultimately excluded from our analysis as women were only given PPIs immediately prior to Cesarean section for acid aspiration prevention. The two trials included in the meta-analysis evaluated the treatment of 177 women with diagnosed preeclampsia. For the primary outcomes, moderate-certainty evidence showed there is likely no effect of the use of PPIs on risk of HELLP syndrome (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.37 - 3.99, I² = 0%) or perinatal mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.36 - 1.79, I² = 0%), while there were insufficient data to meta-analyse all other primary outcomes, including eclampsia and neonatal mortality. No trials investigated PPIs for preventing preeclampsia.

Conclusions: Given the limited outcome data we are uncertain of the effect of PPIs in women with preeclampsia. Further trials are required to determine what (if any) effects PPIs might have for preeclampsia prevention or treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孕期质子泵抑制剂对治疗子痫前期的影响及相关结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:这是一篇系统性综述:本系统综述评估了孕期服用 PPIs 对子痫前期及相关孕产妇、胎儿和新生儿结局影响的现有证据:数据来源:2023 年 11 月 17 日检索了五个电子数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane CENTRAL 和 Global Medicus Index):研究评估和综合方法:采用随机效应模型对所有相关结果进行 Meta 分析。结果以风险比或平均差表示。使用 "偏倚风险2 "工具进行了质量评估,并完成了 "建议、评估、发展和评价分级"(GRADE)评估,以评价证据的确定性。该研究已在 PROSPERO(CRD42023423673)上注册:结果:我们的检索发现了 3,879 条记录,这些记录由两位作者独立筛选。有九份报告(描述了八项试验)符合我们的资格标准,但最终有六项试验被排除在我们的分析之外,因为妇女仅在剖腹产前立即服用 PPIs 以预防酸吸入。纳入荟萃分析的两项试验评估了 177 名确诊子痫前期妇女的治疗情况。在主要结果方面,中度确定性证据显示,使用 PPIs 对 HELLP 综合征(RR 1.21,95% CI 0.37 - 3.99,I² = 0%)或围产期死亡率(RR 0.81,95% CI 0.36 - 1.79,I² = 0%)的风险可能没有影响,而对所有其他主要结果(包括子痫和新生儿死亡率)进行荟萃分析的数据不足。没有试验研究了预防子痫前期的PPIs:鉴于结果数据有限,我们无法确定PPIs对子痫前期妇女的影响。需要进行更多试验,以确定 PPIs 对子痫前期的预防或治疗有哪些影响(如果有的话)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
期刊最新文献
Activity restriction and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes Oxytocin regimen used for induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes. Results of the RE-DINO multicenter randomized trial on the repeated use of vaginal dinoprostone (Propess®) for labor induction in patients at term. Corrigendum to ‘Prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies’ American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM/ Volume 4 (2022) 100551 Validation of the PROMIS© Medication Adherence Scale for Pregnant Patients Taking Aspirin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1