Role of medical regulators in physician wellness: leading or lagging? A brief report on physician wellness practices.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Leader Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1136/leader-2023-000828
Iris Reijmerink, Maarten J van der Laan, Dave Dongelmans, Fokie Cnossen, Ian Leistikow
{"title":"Role of medical regulators in physician wellness: leading or lagging? A brief report on physician wellness practices.","authors":"Iris Reijmerink, Maarten J van der Laan, Dave Dongelmans, Fokie Cnossen, Ian Leistikow","doi":"10.1136/leader-2023-000828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician wellness remains a growing concern, not only affecting the physicians' quality of life but also the quality of care delivered. One of the core tasks of medical regulatory authorities (MRAs) is to supervise the quality and safety of care. This brief report aimed to evaluate the practices of MRAs regarding physician wellness and their views on residents as a high-risk group for decreased physician wellness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was sent to MRAs worldwide, related to four topics: the identification of physician wellness as a risk factor for quality of care, data collection, interventions and the identification of residents as high risk for poor physician wellness. 26 responses were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>23 MRAs consider poor physician wellness a risk factor for quality of care, 10 collect data and 13 have instruments to improve physician wellness. Nine MRAs identify residents as a high-risk group for poor physician wellness. Seven MRAs feel no responsibility for physician wellness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although almost all MRAs see poor physician wellness as a risk factor, actively countering this risk does not yet appear to be common practice. Given their unique position within the healthcare regulatory framework, MRAs could help improve physician wellness.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2023-000828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physician wellness remains a growing concern, not only affecting the physicians' quality of life but also the quality of care delivered. One of the core tasks of medical regulatory authorities (MRAs) is to supervise the quality and safety of care. This brief report aimed to evaluate the practices of MRAs regarding physician wellness and their views on residents as a high-risk group for decreased physician wellness.

Methods: A questionnaire was sent to MRAs worldwide, related to four topics: the identification of physician wellness as a risk factor for quality of care, data collection, interventions and the identification of residents as high risk for poor physician wellness. 26 responses were included.

Results: 23 MRAs consider poor physician wellness a risk factor for quality of care, 10 collect data and 13 have instruments to improve physician wellness. Nine MRAs identify residents as a high-risk group for poor physician wellness. Seven MRAs feel no responsibility for physician wellness.

Conclusion: Although almost all MRAs see poor physician wellness as a risk factor, actively countering this risk does not yet appear to be common practice. Given their unique position within the healthcare regulatory framework, MRAs could help improve physician wellness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗监管机构在医生健康方面的作用:领先还是滞后?关于医生健康实践的简要报告。
背景:医生的健康问题日益受到关注,这不仅影响到医生的生活质量,也影响到医疗服务的质量。医疗监管机构(MRA)的核心任务之一就是监督医疗质量和安全。本简要报告旨在评估医疗监管机构在医生健康方面的做法,以及他们对住院医生作为医生健康下降的高危人群的看法:方法:向世界各地的医疗监管机构发送了一份调查问卷,内容涉及四个方面:将医生健康视为医疗质量的风险因素、数据收集、干预措施以及将住院医师确定为医生健康状况不佳的高风险人群。结果显示:23 个 MRA 认为医生健康状况不佳是影响医疗质量的一个风险因素,10 个 MRA 收集了数据,13 个 MRA 有改善医生健康状况的工具。有 9 家 MRA 认为居民是医生健康状况不佳的高风险群体。7名MRA认为自己对医生健康没有责任:尽管几乎所有的 MRA 都将医生健康状况不佳视为一个风险因素,但积极应对这一风险似乎尚未成为普遍做法。鉴于其在医疗监管框架中的独特地位,MRA 可以帮助改善医生的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
'What Matters to Staff Programme': eight steps to improve staff well-being at work. Winding up to wind down: designing the end of one's medical career with intentionality. Impact of microgeography on communication dynamics in a healthcare environment. Roadmap for the transition to robotic radial cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer in a tertiary urology unit: planning for change. Dyad leadership blueprint: nine strategies for effective collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1