Dale B Read, Tess R Flood, Amy E Harwood, Thomas Dos'Santos, Jonathon J S Weakley, Gethin H Evans
{"title":"Physiological and perceptual responses of wearing a dryrobe for rewarming after passive cold-water immersion in men.","authors":"Dale B Read, Tess R Flood, Amy E Harwood, Thomas Dos'Santos, Jonathon J S Weakley, Gethin H Evans","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the physiological and perceptual responses to wearing a dryrobe for rewarming after passive cold-water immersion (CWI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>15 unhabituated healthy Caucasian men (age: 28.9 (5.4) years) attended the laboratory on three occasions and performed passive CWI (14°C) for 30 min followed by 15 min of rewarming wearing either a dryrobe, towel or foil blanket while positioned in front of fans replicating a 10 mph wind. Physiological (deep body temperature, skin temperature and heart rate) and perceptual (thermal sensation and thermal comfort) variables were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 15 min post-immersion, deep body temperature was higher in the dryrobe condition (mean: 37.09 (SD: 0.49)°C) compared with the foil blanket (36.98 (0.64)°C) and towel (36.99 (0.49)°C) (p<0.001). On average across the 15 min post-immersion period, the dryrobe increased skin temperature to the greatest degree (18.9 (1.0)°C, +2.4°C), compared with the foil blanket (18.1 (1.2)°C, +1.8°C, p=0.034) and the towel (16.6 (1.2)°C, +1.3°C, p<0.001). Average heart rate across the 15 min post-immersion period was lower when wearing the dryrobe (dryrobe: 74 (10) b.min<sup>-1</sup>, foil blanket: 78 (6) b.min<sup>-1</sup> and towel: 82 (14) b.min<sup>-1</sup> (p=0.015). Thermal sensation and thermal comfort were higher at all post-immersion time points in the dryrobe compared with the foil blanket and towel.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the rewarming period following CWI, physiological and perceptual responses are improved when wearing clothing that combines an insulative layer with a vapour barrier, such as the dryrobe compared with a towel or foil blanket. This might have future implications for safety recommendations during rewarming.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"10 3","pages":"e001934"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the physiological and perceptual responses to wearing a dryrobe for rewarming after passive cold-water immersion (CWI).
Methods: 15 unhabituated healthy Caucasian men (age: 28.9 (5.4) years) attended the laboratory on three occasions and performed passive CWI (14°C) for 30 min followed by 15 min of rewarming wearing either a dryrobe, towel or foil blanket while positioned in front of fans replicating a 10 mph wind. Physiological (deep body temperature, skin temperature and heart rate) and perceptual (thermal sensation and thermal comfort) variables were measured.
Results: At 15 min post-immersion, deep body temperature was higher in the dryrobe condition (mean: 37.09 (SD: 0.49)°C) compared with the foil blanket (36.98 (0.64)°C) and towel (36.99 (0.49)°C) (p<0.001). On average across the 15 min post-immersion period, the dryrobe increased skin temperature to the greatest degree (18.9 (1.0)°C, +2.4°C), compared with the foil blanket (18.1 (1.2)°C, +1.8°C, p=0.034) and the towel (16.6 (1.2)°C, +1.3°C, p<0.001). Average heart rate across the 15 min post-immersion period was lower when wearing the dryrobe (dryrobe: 74 (10) b.min-1, foil blanket: 78 (6) b.min-1 and towel: 82 (14) b.min-1 (p=0.015). Thermal sensation and thermal comfort were higher at all post-immersion time points in the dryrobe compared with the foil blanket and towel.
Conclusions: During the rewarming period following CWI, physiological and perceptual responses are improved when wearing clothing that combines an insulative layer with a vapour barrier, such as the dryrobe compared with a towel or foil blanket. This might have future implications for safety recommendations during rewarming.