The Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Learning in Prosthodontic Education: A Systematic Review

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Dental Education Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1111/eje.13035
Sarah Abu Arqub, Nada Ahmed Al-Shehri, Sarah Meyer, Sohrab Asefi, Dalya Al-Moghrabi
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Technology-Enhanced Learning in Prosthodontic Education: A Systematic Review","authors":"Sarah Abu Arqub,&nbsp;Nada Ahmed Al-Shehri,&nbsp;Sarah Meyer,&nbsp;Sohrab Asefi,&nbsp;Dalya Al-Moghrabi","doi":"10.1111/eje.13035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the effectiveness of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) with traditional learning in prosthodontic education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The protocol was registered before commencement [CRD42023390277]. The search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on comparative assessment of TEL and traditional learning in prosthodontic education up to 6 June 2024. A comprehensive search strategy was formulated, encompassing multiple electronic databases. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane tool (RoB 2) were performed. Educational outcomes were evaluated by Kirkpatrick's four-level evaluation model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 2830 records identified, 14 RCTs were included. All the trials were judged at high risk of bias or had some concerns. The included studies assessed the short-term benefits of various TEL approaches, including e-learning, blended learning, video demonstration specialized self-evaluation software and virtual reality simulation in prosthodontic education for undergraduates. Promising results were found in individual studies, particularly in terms of perceived learning conditions with problem-based learning (PBL) and self-reported understanding and confidence when using video demonstrations. Most studies reported comparable outcomes to traditional learning in practical skills assessments, while the results regarding the acquisition of theoretical knowledge through the incorporation of TEL approaches were contradictory. One study reported promising results in perceived learning conditions with the PBL approach, as well as improved self-reported understanding and confidence with the use of video demonstrations. Furthermore, there was a limited number of studies assessing the effect of TEL approaches on students' behaviour.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the adoption of TEL approaches in prosthodontics. However, the incorporation of virtual reality simulation has demonstrated promising results, particularly in improving practical clinical skills.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":"28 4","pages":"995-1015"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eje.13035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) with traditional learning in prosthodontic education.

Methods

The protocol was registered before commencement [CRD42023390277]. The search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on comparative assessment of TEL and traditional learning in prosthodontic education up to 6 June 2024. A comprehensive search strategy was formulated, encompassing multiple electronic databases. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane tool (RoB 2) were performed. Educational outcomes were evaluated by Kirkpatrick's four-level evaluation model.

Results

Of 2830 records identified, 14 RCTs were included. All the trials were judged at high risk of bias or had some concerns. The included studies assessed the short-term benefits of various TEL approaches, including e-learning, blended learning, video demonstration specialized self-evaluation software and virtual reality simulation in prosthodontic education for undergraduates. Promising results were found in individual studies, particularly in terms of perceived learning conditions with problem-based learning (PBL) and self-reported understanding and confidence when using video demonstrations. Most studies reported comparable outcomes to traditional learning in practical skills assessments, while the results regarding the acquisition of theoretical knowledge through the incorporation of TEL approaches were contradictory. One study reported promising results in perceived learning conditions with the PBL approach, as well as improved self-reported understanding and confidence with the use of video demonstrations. Furthermore, there was a limited number of studies assessing the effect of TEL approaches on students' behaviour.

Conclusion

There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the adoption of TEL approaches in prosthodontics. However, the incorporation of virtual reality simulation has demonstrated promising results, particularly in improving practical clinical skills.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术强化学习在口腔修复教育中的效果:系统性综述。
目的比较技术强化学习(TEL)与传统学习在口腔修复教育中的效果:研究方案在开始前已注册[CRD42023390277]。该检索旨在确定截至 2024 年 6 月 6 日的随机对照试验 (RCT),其重点是对口腔修复教育中的技术强化学习和传统学习进行比较评估。该研究制定了一个涵盖多个电子数据库的综合检索策略。使用科克伦工具(RoB 2)进行了筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。教育成果采用柯克帕特里克的四级评估模型进行评估:在确定的 2830 条记录中,共纳入了 14 项 RCT。所有试验均被判定为偏倚风险较高或存在一些问题。所纳入的研究评估了各种电信技术方法的短期效益,包括电子学习、混合学习、视频演示专业自我评估软件和虚拟现实模拟在本科生口腔修复教育中的应用。个别研究发现了令人鼓舞的结果,特别是在基于问题的学习(PBL)的感知学习条件方面,以及在使用视频演示时自我报告的理解和信心方面。大多数研究报告称,在实践技能评估方面,结果与传统学习方法相当,而在通过结合信 息和通信技术方法获取理论知识方面,结果则相互矛盾。有一项研究报告称,PBL 方法在感知学习条件方面取得了可喜的成果,而使用视频演示则提高了自我报告的理解能力和自信心。此外,评估电子学习方法对学生行为影响的研究数量有限:缺乏高质量的证据支持在口腔修复学中采用影音教学法。然而,虚拟现实模拟的应用已经取得了可喜的成果,尤其是在提高临床实践技能方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The Graduating European Dentist Curriculum Framework: A 7-Year Review. Beyond the Drill: Understanding Empathy Among Undergraduate Dental Students. Future-Proofing Dentistry: A Qualitative Exploration of COVID-19 Responses in UK Dental Schools. Mapping the Landscape of Generative Language Models in Dental Education: A Comparison Between ChatGPT and Google Bard. Performance of a Generative Pre-Trained Transformer in Generating Scientific Abstracts in Dentistry: A Comparative Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1