How to detect fake online physician reviews: A deep learning approach.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241277171
Yuehua Zhao, Tianyi Li, Qinjian Yuan, Sanhong Deng
{"title":"How to detect fake online physician reviews: A deep learning approach.","authors":"Yuehua Zhao, Tianyi Li, Qinjian Yuan, Sanhong Deng","doi":"10.1177/20552076241277171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has spurred an increased interest in online healthcare and a surge in usage of online healthcare platforms, leading to a proliferation of user-generated online physician reviews. Yet, distinguishing between genuine and fake reviews poses a significant challenge. This study aims to address the challenges delineated above by developing a reliable and effective fake review detection model leveraging deep learning approaches based on a fake review dataset tailored to the context of Chinese online medical platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Inspired by prior research, this paper adopts a crowdsourcing approach to assemble the fake review dataset for Chinese online medical platforms. To develop the fake review detection models, classical machine learning models, along with deep learning models such as Convolutional Neural Network and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our experimental deep learning model exhibited superior performance in identifying fake reviews on online medical platforms, achieving a precision of 98.36% and an F2-Score of 97.97%. Compared to the traditional machine learning models (i.e., logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, ridge regression), this represents an 8.16% enhancement in precision and a 7.7% increase in F2-Score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, this study provides a valuable contribution toward the development of an effective fake physician review detection model for online medical platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241277171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has spurred an increased interest in online healthcare and a surge in usage of online healthcare platforms, leading to a proliferation of user-generated online physician reviews. Yet, distinguishing between genuine and fake reviews poses a significant challenge. This study aims to address the challenges delineated above by developing a reliable and effective fake review detection model leveraging deep learning approaches based on a fake review dataset tailored to the context of Chinese online medical platforms.

Methods: Inspired by prior research, this paper adopts a crowdsourcing approach to assemble the fake review dataset for Chinese online medical platforms. To develop the fake review detection models, classical machine learning models, along with deep learning models such as Convolutional Neural Network and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, were applied.

Results: Our experimental deep learning model exhibited superior performance in identifying fake reviews on online medical platforms, achieving a precision of 98.36% and an F2-Score of 97.97%. Compared to the traditional machine learning models (i.e., logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, ridge regression), this represents an 8.16% enhancement in precision and a 7.7% increase in F2-Score.

Conclusion: Overall, this study provides a valuable contribution toward the development of an effective fake physician review detection model for online medical platforms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何检测虚假在线医生评论?深度学习方法。
目的:COVID-19 大流行激发了人们对在线医疗保健的兴趣,在线医疗保健平台的使用率激增,导致用户生成的在线医生评论激增。然而,如何区分真假评论是一项重大挑战。本研究旨在利用深度学习方法,基于为中国在线医疗平台量身定制的虚假评论数据集,开发可靠有效的虚假评论检测模型,从而应对上述挑战:受先前研究的启发,本文采用众包方法为中国在线医疗平台收集虚假评论数据集。为了开发虚假评论检测模型,我们应用了经典机器学习模型以及深度学习模型,如卷积神经网络和来自变形器的双向编码器表示:我们的实验性深度学习模型在识别在线医疗平台上的虚假评论方面表现出色,精确度达到 98.36%,F2 分数达到 97.97%。与传统的机器学习模型(即逻辑回归、支持向量机、随机森林、脊回归)相比,精确度提高了 8.16%,F2-分数提高了 7.7%:总之,本研究为在线医疗平台开发有效的虚假医生评论检测模型做出了宝贵贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
期刊最新文献
A feasibility study on utilizing machine learning technology to reduce the costs of gastric cancer screening in Taizhou, China. Ageing well with tech: Exploring the determinants of e-healthcare services adoption in an emerging economy. Chinese colposcopists' attitudes toward the colposcopic artificial intelligence auxiliary diagnostic system (CAIADS): A nation-wide, multi-center survey. Digital leadership: Norwegian healthcare managers' attitudes towards using digital tools. Disease characteristics influence the privacy calculus to adopt electronic health records: A survey study in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1