Formal and informal human milk donation in New Zealand: a mixed-method national survey.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Breastfeeding Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1186/s13006-024-00667-4
Shalee Harris, Frank H Bloomfield, Mariana Muelbert
{"title":"Formal and informal human milk donation in New Zealand: a mixed-method national survey.","authors":"Shalee Harris, Frank H Bloomfield, Mariana Muelbert","doi":"10.1186/s13006-024-00667-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mother's milk provides optimal nutrition for infants. Donor human milk (DHM) is recommended for low birthweight infants when mother's milk is unavailable. Little is known about human milk (HM) donation practices in New Zealand (NZ), where few HM banks are available. This study aimed to investigate parents' and health professionals' (HP) experiences with formal and informal HM donation in NZ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two electronic surveys were disseminated in 2022 to parents and HPs involved with HM donation in NZ. The surveys covered respondents' views and experiences with HM donation. HPs were also asked about HM donation practices in their workplace. Chi-squared and Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact tests were used for quantitative analysis and qualitative data were thematically analysed using inductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 232 HP and 496 parents completed the surveys. Most parents either donated (52%) or sought DHM (26%) for their infant and most donations were informal, arranged between individuals (52%) or through hospital staff (22%). HP reported DHM was used in 86% of facilities, with only 20% of donations facilitated by HM banks. Almost half (48%) of HP stated they would like to use DHM in their workplace but access was limited. The most common screening processes undertaken by parents and HP before informal HM donation were lifestyle including smoking status, medication, drug and alcohol intake (44% and 36%, respectively) and serological screening such as CMV, HIV, Hepatitis C or B (30% and 39%, respectively). Pasteurisation of DHM obtained informally was not common. Most donors were satisfied with their HM donation experiences (informal and/or formal, 91%) and most respondents supported use of DHM in hospitals and community. Participants reported HM donation could be improved (e.g., better access) and identified potential benefits (e.g., species-specific nutrition) and risks (e.g., pathogens) for the infant. Potential benefits for the donor were also identified (e.g., altruism), but respondents acknowledged potential negative impacts (e.g., cost).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Informal HM donation in NZ is common. Most parents and HP support the use of DHM; however, improvements to current practices are needed to ensure safer and more equitable access to DHM.</p>","PeriodicalId":54266,"journal":{"name":"International Breastfeeding Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Breastfeeding Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-024-00667-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mother's milk provides optimal nutrition for infants. Donor human milk (DHM) is recommended for low birthweight infants when mother's milk is unavailable. Little is known about human milk (HM) donation practices in New Zealand (NZ), where few HM banks are available. This study aimed to investigate parents' and health professionals' (HP) experiences with formal and informal HM donation in NZ.

Methods: Two electronic surveys were disseminated in 2022 to parents and HPs involved with HM donation in NZ. The surveys covered respondents' views and experiences with HM donation. HPs were also asked about HM donation practices in their workplace. Chi-squared and Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact tests were used for quantitative analysis and qualitative data were thematically analysed using inductive approach.

Results: A total of 232 HP and 496 parents completed the surveys. Most parents either donated (52%) or sought DHM (26%) for their infant and most donations were informal, arranged between individuals (52%) or through hospital staff (22%). HP reported DHM was used in 86% of facilities, with only 20% of donations facilitated by HM banks. Almost half (48%) of HP stated they would like to use DHM in their workplace but access was limited. The most common screening processes undertaken by parents and HP before informal HM donation were lifestyle including smoking status, medication, drug and alcohol intake (44% and 36%, respectively) and serological screening such as CMV, HIV, Hepatitis C or B (30% and 39%, respectively). Pasteurisation of DHM obtained informally was not common. Most donors were satisfied with their HM donation experiences (informal and/or formal, 91%) and most respondents supported use of DHM in hospitals and community. Participants reported HM donation could be improved (e.g., better access) and identified potential benefits (e.g., species-specific nutrition) and risks (e.g., pathogens) for the infant. Potential benefits for the donor were also identified (e.g., altruism), but respondents acknowledged potential negative impacts (e.g., cost).

Conclusion: Informal HM donation in NZ is common. Most parents and HP support the use of DHM; however, improvements to current practices are needed to ensure safer and more equitable access to DHM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰的正式和非正式母乳捐赠:一项混合方法全国调查。
背景介绍母乳为婴儿提供最佳营养。在没有母乳的情况下,建议为低出生体重婴儿提供捐赠人奶(DHM)。由于新西兰几乎没有母乳库,因此人们对新西兰的母乳捐赠实践知之甚少。本研究旨在调查新西兰父母和卫生专业人员(HP)在正式和非正式母乳捐赠方面的经验:2022 年,向新西兰参与 HM 捐赠的父母和医疗保健人员发放了两份电子调查问卷。调查内容包括受访者对乳腺捐献的看法和经验。此外,还询问了HP在其工作场所的HM捐献做法。定量分析采用卡方检验(Chi-squared)和费雪-弗里曼-霍尔顿精确检验(Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact tests),定性分析采用归纳法:总共有 232 名医务人员和 496 名家长完成了调查。大多数家长或为婴儿捐赠(52%)或寻求 DHM(26%),大多数捐赠是非正式的,由个人之间安排(52%)或通过医院工作人员安排(22%)。据 HP 报告,86% 的医疗机构使用了 DHM,只有 20% 的捐赠是由 HM 银行促成的。近一半(48%)的 HP 表示,他们希望在工作场所使用 DHM,但使用机会有限。父母和 HP 在进行非正式 HHM 捐赠前最常见的筛查程序是生活方式,包括吸烟状况、药物、毒品和酒精摄入量(分别为 44% 和 36%)以及血清学筛查,如 CMV、HIV、丙型肝炎或乙型肝炎(分别为 30% 和 39%)。对非正规获取的 DHM 进行巴氏消毒的情况并不常见。大多数捐献者对其 HM 捐献经历表示满意(非正式和/或正式,91%),大多数受访者支持在医院和社区使用 DHM。参与者报告称,HM 捐赠可以改进(如更好地获取),并指出了对婴儿的潜在益处(如物种特异性营养)和风险(如病原体)。受访者还指出了捐赠者的潜在益处(如利他主义),但也承认了潜在的负面影响(如成本):结论:在新西兰,产妇非正式捐献很普遍。大多数父母和 HP 都支持使用 DHM;但是,需要改进当前的做法,以确保更安全、更公平地获得 DHM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Breastfeeding Journal
International Breastfeeding Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding is recognized as an important public health issue with enormous social and economic implications. Infants who do not receive breast milk are likely to experience poorer health outcomes than breastfed infants; mothers who do not breastfeed increase their own health risks. Publications on the topic of breastfeeding are wide ranging. Articles about breastfeeding are currently published journals focused on nursing, midwifery, paediatric, obstetric, family medicine, public health, immunology, physiology, sociology and many other topics. In addition, electronic publishing allows fast publication time for authors and Open Access ensures the journal is easily accessible to readers.
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting infant feeding choices with a focus on barriers to exclusive breastfeeding in Western Jamaica: a qualitative study Infant formula donations and code violations during earthquake relief efforts in Türkiye in 2023: an observational study. Formal and informal human milk donation in New Zealand: a mixed-method national survey. Experiences of breast milk donors in Sweden: balancing the motivation to do something good with overcoming the challenges it entails. Incidence and factors influencing delayed onset of lactation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1