Navigating the landscape of fear: Fruit flies exhibit distinct antipredator and antiparasite defensive behaviors

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecology Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1002/ecy.4397
Colin D. MacLeod, Lien T. Luong
{"title":"Navigating the landscape of fear: Fruit flies exhibit distinct antipredator and antiparasite defensive behaviors","authors":"Colin D. MacLeod,&nbsp;Lien T. Luong","doi":"10.1002/ecy.4397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most organisms are at risk of being consumed by a predator or getting infected by a parasite at some point in their life. Theoretical constructs such as the landscape of fear (perception of risk) and nonconsumptive effects (NCEs, costly responses <i>sans</i> predation or infection) have been proposed to describe and quantify antipredator and antiparasite responses. How prey/host species identify and respond to these risks determines their survival, reproductive success and, ultimately, fitness. Most studies to date have focused on either predator–prey or parasite–host interactions, yet habitats and ecosystems contain both parasitic and/or predatory species that represent a complex and heterogenous mosaic of risk factors. Here, we experimentally investigated the behavioral responses of a cactophilic fruit fly, <i>Drosophila nigrospiracula</i>, exposed to a range of species that include parasites (ectoparasitic mite), predators (jumping spiders), as well as harmless heterospecifics (nonparasitic mites, ants, and weevils). We demonstrate that <i>D. nigrospiracula</i> can differentiate between threat and non-threat species, increase erratic movements and decrease velocity in the presence of parasites, but decrease erratic movements and time spent grooming in the presence of predators. Of particular importance, flies could distinguish between parasitic female mites and nonparasitic male mites of the same species, and respond accordingly. We also show that the direction of these NCEs differs when exposed to parasitic mites (i.e., risk of infection) versus spiders (i.e., risk of predation). Given the opposing effects of predation versus infection risk on fly behavior, we discuss potential trade-offs between parasite and predator avoidance behaviors. Our findings illustrate the complexity of risk assessment in a landscape of fear and the fine-tuned NCEs that arise in response. Moreover, this study is the first to examine these behavioral NCEs in a terrestrial system.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"105 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.4397","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most organisms are at risk of being consumed by a predator or getting infected by a parasite at some point in their life. Theoretical constructs such as the landscape of fear (perception of risk) and nonconsumptive effects (NCEs, costly responses sans predation or infection) have been proposed to describe and quantify antipredator and antiparasite responses. How prey/host species identify and respond to these risks determines their survival, reproductive success and, ultimately, fitness. Most studies to date have focused on either predator–prey or parasite–host interactions, yet habitats and ecosystems contain both parasitic and/or predatory species that represent a complex and heterogenous mosaic of risk factors. Here, we experimentally investigated the behavioral responses of a cactophilic fruit fly, Drosophila nigrospiracula, exposed to a range of species that include parasites (ectoparasitic mite), predators (jumping spiders), as well as harmless heterospecifics (nonparasitic mites, ants, and weevils). We demonstrate that D. nigrospiracula can differentiate between threat and non-threat species, increase erratic movements and decrease velocity in the presence of parasites, but decrease erratic movements and time spent grooming in the presence of predators. Of particular importance, flies could distinguish between parasitic female mites and nonparasitic male mites of the same species, and respond accordingly. We also show that the direction of these NCEs differs when exposed to parasitic mites (i.e., risk of infection) versus spiders (i.e., risk of predation). Given the opposing effects of predation versus infection risk on fly behavior, we discuss potential trade-offs between parasite and predator avoidance behaviors. Our findings illustrate the complexity of risk assessment in a landscape of fear and the fine-tuned NCEs that arise in response. Moreover, this study is the first to examine these behavioral NCEs in a terrestrial system.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在恐惧的环境中航行:果蝇表现出不同的反捕食者和反寄生虫防御行为。
大多数生物在其生命的某个阶段都面临着被捕食者吞食或被寄生虫感染的风险。人们提出了恐惧景观(风险感知)和非消费性效应(NCEs,非捕食或感染的代价高昂的反应)等理论概念来描述和量化反捕食者和反寄生虫反应。猎物/宿主物种如何识别和应对这些风险决定了它们的生存、繁殖成功率以及最终的适应能力。迄今为止,大多数研究都集中在捕食者-猎物或寄生虫-宿主的相互作用上,然而栖息地和生态系统中同时存在寄生虫和/或捕食性物种,它们代表了复杂而异质的风险因素。在这里,我们通过实验研究了嗜仙人掌果蝇(Drosophila nigrospiracula)暴露于一系列物种的行为反应,这些物种包括寄生虫(外寄生螨)、捕食者(跳跃蜘蛛)以及无害的异种(非寄生螨、蚂蚁和象鼻虫)。我们的研究表明,D. nigrospiracula能区分威胁和非威胁物种,在有寄生虫的情况下会增加不规则运动并降低速度,但在有捕食者的情况下会减少不规则运动和梳理时间。尤其重要的是,苍蝇可以区分寄生的雌螨和同种非寄生的雄螨,并做出相应的反应。我们还发现,当暴露于寄生螨(即感染风险)和蜘蛛(即捕食风险)时,这些 NCEs 的方向是不同的。鉴于捕食和感染风险对苍蝇行为的影响截然相反,我们讨论了寄生虫和捕食者回避行为之间的潜在权衡。我们的研究结果说明了恐惧景观中风险评估的复杂性,以及由此产生的微调 NCE。此外,这项研究还是首次在陆生系统中研究这些行为NCEs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
期刊最新文献
Eco‐phenotypic feedback loops differ in multistressor environments Mistletoes on lianas: Seed dispersal highways or drought safe havens? Evidence from South American temperate rainforests Publication‐driven consistency in food web structures: Implications for comparative ecology Condo or cuisine? The function of fine woody debris in driving decomposition, detritivores, and their predators Functional R code is rare in species distribution and abundance papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1