A Retrospective Cohort Analysis Comparing the Costs of Ankle Fracture Fixation in Orthopaedics and Podiatry in a U.S. Medicare Limited Data Set.

Foot & ankle international Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1177/10711007241268225
James Meyers, Peter Campbell, Alexander Lieber, Joshua Luginbuhl, Nicole Zubizarreta, Eric Gokcen, Jashvant Poeran, Meghan Kelly
{"title":"A Retrospective Cohort Analysis Comparing the Costs of Ankle Fracture Fixation in Orthopaedics and Podiatry in a U.S. Medicare Limited Data Set.","authors":"James Meyers, Peter Campbell, Alexander Lieber, Joshua Luginbuhl, Nicole Zubizarreta, Eric Gokcen, Jashvant Poeran, Meghan Kelly","doi":"10.1177/10711007241268225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing overlap exists between surgeries performed by podiatrists and orthopaedic surgeons. Large-scale cost comparisons between the two are lacking despite the current climate of cost containment in health care. Using national Medicare data, we aimed to compare per-case Medicare payments between podiatrists and orthopaedic surgeons for ankle fracture fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients in an outpatient setting undergoing either unimalleolar, bimalleolar, or trimalleolar ankle fracture repair from the national Medicare Limited Data Set (2013-2019). Type of surgeon (podiatrist or orthopaedic surgeon) was determined using publicly available information. The primary outcome was total Medicare payments specific to the procedure, as a surrogate for cost. A subset analysis was also done to directly compare costs of orthopaedic surgeons to podiatric surgeons while excluding other fees (eg, hospital facility fees and surgery-related imaging payments). Additionally, patient demographics and hospital characteristics were compared to determine if any factors associated with costs may influence group differences. Univariable tests assessed significance of group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 16 927 unimalleolar, 17 244 bimalleolar, and 11 717 trimalleolar fracture repairs were included; 86.7% and 13.3%, 92.4% and 7.6%, and 92.2% and 7.8% were performed by an orthopaedic surgeon or podiatrist, respectively. Median age (70-71 years) and median Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (0) did not significantly differ between patients treated by either surgeon type. Median procedure-specific Medicare payments for all 3 categories of ankle fracture repairs (uni-, bi-, trimalleolar) were significantly lower for orthopaedic surgeons compared to podiatrists: $4156 vs $4300, $4205 vs $4379, and $4396 vs $4525, respectively (all <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our investigation using a national Medicare data set (2013-2019) found that the 3 types of ankle fractures (unimalleolar, bimalleolar, and trimalleolar) performed by orthopaedic surgeons in an outpatient setting were less expensive and that cost differences do not appear to be driven by patient characteristics. These results and further research into the causes of the cost differences may help improve the cost-effectiveness of ankle fracture surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"1279-1291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007241268225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing overlap exists between surgeries performed by podiatrists and orthopaedic surgeons. Large-scale cost comparisons between the two are lacking despite the current climate of cost containment in health care. Using national Medicare data, we aimed to compare per-case Medicare payments between podiatrists and orthopaedic surgeons for ankle fracture fixation.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients in an outpatient setting undergoing either unimalleolar, bimalleolar, or trimalleolar ankle fracture repair from the national Medicare Limited Data Set (2013-2019). Type of surgeon (podiatrist or orthopaedic surgeon) was determined using publicly available information. The primary outcome was total Medicare payments specific to the procedure, as a surrogate for cost. A subset analysis was also done to directly compare costs of orthopaedic surgeons to podiatric surgeons while excluding other fees (eg, hospital facility fees and surgery-related imaging payments). Additionally, patient demographics and hospital characteristics were compared to determine if any factors associated with costs may influence group differences. Univariable tests assessed significance of group differences.

Results: Overall, 16 927 unimalleolar, 17 244 bimalleolar, and 11 717 trimalleolar fracture repairs were included; 86.7% and 13.3%, 92.4% and 7.6%, and 92.2% and 7.8% were performed by an orthopaedic surgeon or podiatrist, respectively. Median age (70-71 years) and median Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (0) did not significantly differ between patients treated by either surgeon type. Median procedure-specific Medicare payments for all 3 categories of ankle fracture repairs (uni-, bi-, trimalleolar) were significantly lower for orthopaedic surgeons compared to podiatrists: $4156 vs $4300, $4205 vs $4379, and $4396 vs $4525, respectively (all P < .001).

Conclusion: Our investigation using a national Medicare data set (2013-2019) found that the 3 types of ankle fractures (unimalleolar, bimalleolar, and trimalleolar) performed by orthopaedic surgeons in an outpatient setting were less expensive and that cost differences do not appear to be driven by patient characteristics. These results and further research into the causes of the cost differences may help improve the cost-effectiveness of ankle fracture surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项回顾性队列分析,比较美国医疗保险有限数据集中骨科和足病科踝关节骨折固定的成本。
背景:足科医生和矫形外科医生所做手术之间的重叠越来越多。尽管目前医疗保健领域正处于控制成本的大环境下,但两者之间缺乏大规模的成本比较。我们利用全国医疗保险数据,旨在比较足科医生和矫形外科医生在踝关节骨折固定方面的每例医疗保险支付情况:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了全国医疗保险有限数据集(2013-2019 年)中接受单极、双极或三极踝关节骨折修复的门诊患者。外科医生类型(足病医生或骨科医生)通过公开信息确定。主要结果是针对手术的医疗保险支付总额,作为成本的替代指标。还进行了子集分析,以直接比较骨科医生和足病外科医生的成本,同时排除其他费用(如医院设施费和手术相关的成像费用)。此外,还对患者人口统计学特征和医院特征进行了比较,以确定与成本相关的因素是否会影响组间差异。单变量检验评估了组间差异的显著性:共纳入 16 927 例单极骨折修复、17 244 例双极骨折修复和 11 717 例三极骨折修复;分别有 86.7% 和 13.3%、92.4% 和 7.6% 以及 92.2% 和 7.8% 由骨科医生或足病医生实施。接受两种外科医生治疗的患者的中位年龄(70-71 岁)和中位 Charlson-Deyo 综合征指数(0)没有显著差异。与足科医生相比,矫形外科医生在所有三类踝关节骨折修复(单踝、双踝、三踝)手术中的具体医疗保险支付中位数明显较低:分别为 4156 美元对 4300 美元、4205 美元对 4379 美元、4396 美元对 4525 美元(均为 P 结论:我们使用全国性医疗保险数据进行的调查显示,矫形外科医生在所有三类踝关节骨折修复手术中的具体医疗保险支付中位数明显较低:我们使用全国医疗保险数据集(2013-2019 年)进行的调查发现,由骨科医生在门诊环境中实施的 3 种类型的踝关节骨折(单极、双极和三极)的费用较低,而且费用差异似乎并非由患者特征造成。这些结果以及对成本差异原因的进一步研究可能有助于提高踝关节骨折手术的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Factors Related to the Size and Hepple Classification of Medial Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus. Utility of 3D Wound Assessment in Monitoring Granulation Tissue Velocity Following Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcers. The Shape of Things to Come. Talar Morphology of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients With Cavovarus Feet. In Vivo Kinematics of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis With Different Loading Weights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1